Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Dealing with initial inconclusive serological results for chronic Chagas disease in clinical practice

  • Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Most guidelines for Chagas disease recommend the performance of two serological tests in order to detect it. However, inconclusive results may arise from this strategy. The aim was to describe whether serological follow-up together with the patient’s clinical characteristics could clarify the outcome of patients with initial inconclusive test results. In this retrospective case series, all results of Chagas disease serological tests and outpatient visits recorded from 2004 to 2008 were screened for inclusion. The inclusion criterion was clinical suspicion of chronic Chagas disease and the exclusion criteria were previous diagnosis of Chagas disease, suspicion of acute Chagas disease, and serological tests with no corresponding medical evaluation. A total of 1,732 patients were analyzed. Chronic Chagas disease prevalence was 21.1%. After the initial set of serological tests, 2.9% of patients had inconclusive test results. Most of these patients had definite diagnosis after clinical follow-up and the repetition of serological tests in a new blood sample. Loss to follow-up while partaking in the diagnostic investigation reached 17.7%. The prevalence of initial inconclusive serological tests for chronic Chagas disease is low. Clinical evaluations and follow-up clarify the definite diagnosis. Noncompliance to follow-up is a frequent problem. Strategies to reduce inconclusive results and noncompliance are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. El Salvador. Ministerio de la Salud Publica y Asistencia Social. Norma tecnica de prevencion y control de la enfermedad de Chagas. 2007. Available online at: http://www.paho.org/spanish/ad/dpc/cd/dch-els-normas.pdf

  2. (2008) Guías clínicas de la enfermedad de Chagas 2006: Parte V. Diagnóstico de laboratorio. Rev Chil Infect 25(5):379–383

  3. Bern C, Montgomery SP, Herwaldt BL, Rassi A Jr, Marin-Neto JA, Dantas RO et al (2007) Evaluation and treatment of Chagas disease in the United States: a systematic review. JAMA 298(18):2171–2181

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. World Health Organization (WHO) (2002) Control of Chagas disease: second report of the WHO Expert Committee. Available online at: http://whqlibdoc.who.int/trs/WHO_TRS_905.pdf

  5. Ministério da Saúde. Secretaria de Vigilância em Saúde (2005) Brazilian Consensus on Chagas disease. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop 38(Suppl 3):7–29

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gascón J; Grupo de Trabajo del Taller Enfermedad de Chagas Importada: Un Nuevo Reto de Salud Pública? (2005) Diagnosis and treatment of imported Chagas disease. Med Clin (Barc) 125(6):230–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. R Development Core Team (2010) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria. Home page at: http://www.R-project.org

  8. Appleman MD, Shulman IA, Saxena S, Kirchhoff LV (1993) Use of a questionnaire to identify potential blood donors at risk for infection with Trypanosoma cruzi. Transfusion 33(1):61–64

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hamerschlak N, Pasternak J, Amato Neto V, de Carvalho MB, Guerra CS, Coscina AL et al (1997) Chagas’ disease: an algorithm for donor screening and positive donor counseling. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop 30(3):205–209

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Sobreira AC, Gomes FV, Silva MA, Oliveira MF (2001) Chagasic infection prevalence in blood donors at the Regional Blood Donation Center of Iguatu. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop 34(2):193–196

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Araújo AB, Vianna EES, Berne MEA (2008) Anti-Trypanosoma cruzi antibody detection in blood donors in the Southern Brazil. Braz J Infect Dis 12(6):480–482

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Furuchó CR, Umezawa ES, Almeida I, Freitas VL, Bezerra R, Nunes EV et al (2008) Inconclusive results in conventional serological screening for Chagas’ disease in blood banks: evaluation of cellular and humoral response. Trop Med Int Health 13(12):1527–1533

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Batista AM, Aguiar C, Almeida EA, Guariento ME, Wanderley JS, Costa SCB (2010) Evidence of Chagas disease in seronegative Brazilian patients with megaesophagus. Int J Infect Dis 14(11):e974–e977

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Picka MCM, Meira DA, de Carvalho TB, Peresi E, Marcondes-Machado J (2007) Definition of a diagnostic routine in individuals with inconclusive serology for Chagas disease. Braz J Infect Dis 11(2):226–233

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Reiche EM, Cavazzana M Jr, Okamura H, Tagata EC, Jankevicius SI, Jankevicius JV (1998) Evaluation of the western blot in the confirmatory serologic diagnosis of Chagas’ disease. Am J Trop Med Hyg 59(5):750–756

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Mendes RP, Hoshino-Shimizu S, Moura da Silva AM, Mota I, Heredia RA, Luquetti AO et al (1997) Serological diagnosis of Chagas’ disease: a potential confirmatory assay using preserved protein antigens of Trypanosoma cruzi. J Clin Microbiol 35(7):1829–1834

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Leiby DA, Read EJ, Lenes BA, Yund AJ, Stumpf RJ, Kirchhoff LV et al (1997) Seroepidemiology of Trypanosoma cruzi, etiologic agent of Chagas’ disease, in US blood donors. J Infect Dis 176(4):1047–1052

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Vinelli E, Aguilar M, Pavón L, Enamorado N (1995) El interrogatorio como instrumento para la exclusión de donantes de sangre con riesgo para la transmisión del Trypanosoma cruzi. Rev Méd Hondur 63(3):96–99

    Google Scholar 

  19. Martelli CMT, Andrade ALSS, Silva SA, Zicker F (1992) Risk factors for Trypanosoma cruzi infection among blood donors in central Brazil. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 87(3):339–343

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Pirard M, Iihoshi N, Boelaert M, Basanta P, López F, Van der Stuyft P (2005) The validity of serologic tests for Trypanosoma cruzi and the effectiveness of transfusional screening strategies in a hyperendemic region. Transfusion 45(4):554–561

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Salles NA, Sabino EC, Cliquet MG, Eluf-Neto J, Mayer A, Almeida-Neto C et al (1996) Risk of exposure to Chagas’ disease among seroreactive Brazilian blood donors. Transfusion 36(11–12):969–973

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Ferreira-Silva MM, Pereira GA, Lages-Silva E, Moraes-Souza H (2010) Socioepidemiological screening of serologically ineligible blood donors due to Chagas disease for the definition of inconclusive cases. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 105(6):800–805

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. De Andrade ALSS, Zicker F, Silva IG, Souza JMP, Martelli CMT (1995) Risk factors for Trypanosoma cruzi infection among children in central brazil: a case–control study in vector control settings. Am J Trop Med Hyg 52(2):183–187

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Black CL, Ocaña S, Riner D, Costales JA, Lascano MS, Davila S et al (2007) Household risk factors for Trypanosoma cruzi seropositivity in two geographic regions of Ecuador. J Parasitol 93(1):12–16

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Feliciangeli MD, Sánchez-Martín MJ, Suárez B, Marrero R, Torrellas A, Bravo A et al (2007) Risk factors for Trypanosoma cruzi human infection in Barinas State, Venezuela. Am J Trop Med Hyg 76(5):915–921

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Rizzo NR, Arana BA, Diaz A, Cordon-Rosales C, Klein RE, Powell MR (2003) Seroprevalence of Trypanosoma cruzi infection among school-age children in the endemic area of Guatemala. Am J Trop Med Hyg 68(6):678–682

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Tortora C, Bejarano I, Dipierri J, Alfaro E, García T (2000) Chagas diseases seroepidemiology in schoolchildren of Jujuy [Seroepidemiologia de la enfermedad de chagas en escolares de Jujuy]. Medicina (B Aires) 60(4):469–473

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Gürtler RE, Chuit R, Cécere MC, Castañera MB, Cohen JE, Segura EL (1998) Household prevalence of seropositivity for Trypanosoma cruzi in three rural villages in northwest Argentina: environmental, demographic, and entomologic associations. Am J Trop Med Hyg 59(5):741–749

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

J.S. Lapa was funded by Centro de Integração Empresa-Escola (CIEE).

Conflicts of interest

No conflicts of interest to declare.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. E. A. A. do Brasil.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lapa, J.S., Saraiva, R.M., Hasslocher-Moreno, A.M. et al. Dealing with initial inconclusive serological results for chronic Chagas disease in clinical practice. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 31, 965–974 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-011-1393-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-011-1393-9

Keywords

Navigation