Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Validation of the MicroScan-96 for the species identification and methicillin susceptibility testing of clinical significant coagulase-negative staphylococci

  • Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An automated system, MicroScan WalkAway-96, in conjugation with Combo Pos® 28 panels, was validated for the identification and methicillin susceptibility of coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS). The performance of this system was evaluated on 428 CNS. Identification results were compared using a validated in-house method. Methicillin susceptibility was compared with oxacillin MIC testing and the presence of the mecA gene by PCR (in-house real-time method). The MicroScan system correctly identified 94.6% of the staphylococci (405 out of 428). 3.5% of the strains (15 out of 428) were not correctly identified. 1.9% of the isolates (8 out of 428) were correctly identified with a low probability. Identification of Staphylococcus warneri and Staphylococcus lugdunensis was determined with the least accuracy. Microscan combines both oxacillin and cefoxitin for determination of the methicillin susceptibility result. Correlation between this result and the mecA method was 97.6%. Correlation with the oxacillin MIC method was also 97.6%. Fourteen isolates showed a discrepant result, 8 were reported to be resistant in mecA-negative strains, 2 were reported false-susceptible in mecA positive strains and 4 strains showed a discrepant result with oxacillin MIC, but not with mecA determination. The automated system can be considered a simple and reliable method for identification and methicillin susceptibility of CNS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chambers H (1997) Methicillin resistance in staphylococci: molecular and biochemical basis and implications. Clin Microbiol Rev 10:781–791

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Diekema DJ, Pfaller MA, Schmitz FJ, Smayevsky J, Bell J, Jones RN, Beach M, The Sentry Participants Group (2001) Survey of infections due to Staphylococcus species: frequency of occurrence and antimicrobial susceptibility of isolates collected in the United States, Canada, Latin America, Europe, and the Western Pacific region for the SENTRY antimicrobial surveillance program. Clin Infect Dis 32:S114–S132

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ferreira R, Iorio N, Malvar K, Nunes A, Fonseca L, Bastos C, Santos K (2003) Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci: comparison of phenotypic and genotypic oxacillin susceptibility tests and evaluation of the agar screening test by using different concentrations of oxacillin. J Clin Microbiol 41:3609–3614

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Gradelski E, Valera L, Aleksunes L, Bonner D, Fung-tomc T (2001) Correlation between genotype and phenotypic categorization of staphylococci based on methicillin susceptibility and resistance. J Clin Microbiol 39:2961–2963

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. John JF, Harvin AM (2007) History and evolution of antibiotic resistance in CNS: susceptibility profiles of new anti-staphylococcal agents. Ther Clin Risk Manag 3:1143–1152

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Ieven M, Verhoeven J, Pattyn SR, Goossens H (1995) Rapid and economical method for species identification of clinically significant coagulase-negative staphylococci. J Clin Microbiol 33:1060–1063

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Caierão J, Musskopf M, Superti S, Roesch E, Dias CG, d’Azevedo PA (2004) Evaluation of phenotypic methods for methicillin resistance characterization in CNS. J Med Microbiol 53:1195–1199

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Caiero J, Superti S, Dias C, d’Azevedo PA (2006) Automated systems in the identification and determination of methicillin resistance among CNS. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 101:277–279

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hussain Z, Stoakes L, Stevens DL, Schieven BC, Lannigan R, Jones C (1986) Comparison of the MicroScan system with the API Staphy-Ident system for species identification of CNS. J Clin Microbiol 23:126–128

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Miyoung K, Ran HS, Soon CH, Hyelin K, Jeong SP, Moon-Woo S, Do-Hoon L, Kyoung PU, Junghan S, Eui-Chong K (2008) Comparison of the MicroScan Vitek 2 and Crystal GP with 16S rRNA sequencing and MicroSeq 500 v2.0 analysis for CNS. BMC Microbiol 8:233–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Sáa AI, Vivas J, Tinajas A, Barbeyto L, Rodriguez LA (1999) Evaluation of the MicroScan system for identification of Staphylococci. J Basic Microbiol 39:373–376

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Stoakes L, Schieven BC, Ofori E, Ewan P, Lannigan R, Hussain Z (1992) Evaluation of MicroScan Pos Combo panels for identification of staphylococci. J Clin Microbiol 30:93–95

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Bannerman TL (2007) Staphylococcus, Micrococcus, and other catalase-positive cocci that grow aerobically. In: Murray PR (ed) Manual of clinical microbiology, 9th edn. ASM Press, Washington, DC, pp 384–397

    Google Scholar 

  14. Weinstein MP, Mirrett S, Van Pelt L, McKinnon M, Zimmer BL, Kloos W, Reller LB (1998) Clinical importance of identifying CNS isolated from blood cultures: evaluation of MicroScan Rapid and Dried Overnight Gram-Positive Panels versus a conventional reference method. J Clin Microbiol 36:2089–2092

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Grant CE, Sewell DL, Pfaller M, Bumgardner RV, Williams JA (1994) Evaluation of two commercial systems for identification of CNS to species level. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 18:1–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Hussain Z, Stoakes L, Massey V, Diagre D, Fitzgerald V, El Sayed S, Lannigan R (2000) Correlation of Oxacillin MIC with mecA gene carriage in CNS. J Clin Microbiol 38:752–754

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics NV, Anderlecht, Belgium for providing instrumentation, reagents, and panels during the study period, Lindsey Peeters and Carlo Emeleer for their practical input, and finally Inge Neels and Olivier Bossu for their technical support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L. Patteet.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Patteet, L., Goossens, H. & Ieven, M. Validation of the MicroScan-96 for the species identification and methicillin susceptibility testing of clinical significant coagulase-negative staphylococci. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 31, 747–751 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-011-1368-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-011-1368-x

Keywords

Navigation