Skip to main content
Log in

Isolation rates of Brucella melitensis in an endemic area and implications for laboratory safety

  • Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A retrospective study was conducted to assess the potential threat posed by processing blood cultures to clinical microbiology laboratory personnel working in an area endemic for Brucella melitensis in southern Israel. The computerized laboratory records for the 2002–2009 period were reviewed, and the proportion of aerobic vials from which Brucella organisms were isolated out of the total number of positive aerobic blood culture vials was determined. During the 8-year period, B. melitensis was isolated in 514 of 20,620 (2.5%) positive vials. Isolation rate increased at the end of the period reaching a peak of 5.3% in 2008. Between April 2008 and September 2009, the proportion of aerobic blood cultures from which B. melitensis was isolated was even higher than that positive for pneumococci (4.3% and 2.6%, respectively, P < 0.001). Although it has been recommended that processing of Brucella cultures should be confined to a Class II biologic safety cabinet, by the time the organism is identified, extensive manipulation of culture media has already been performed and inadvertent exposure of laboratory personnel may have already occurred. To reduce the risk of transmission, all positive blood culture vials in endemic areas should be processed in a safety cabinet.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Yagupsky P (1999) Detection of brucellae in blood cultures. J Clin Microbiol 37:3437–3442

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Ergonul O, Celikbas A, Tezeren D, Guvener E, Dokuzoguz B (2004) Analysis of risk factors for laboratory-acquired Brucella infections. J Hosp Infect 56:223–227

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Noviello S, Gallo R, Kelly M, Limberger RJ, DeAngelis K, Cain L, Wallace B, Dumas N (2004) Laboratory-acquired brucellosis. Emerg Infect Dis 10:1848–1850

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Pike RM (1978) Past and present hazards of working with infectious agents. Arch Pathol Lab Med 102:333–336

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Yagupsky P, Baron EJ (2005) Laboratory-exposures to brucellae and implications for bioterrorism. Emerg Infect Dis 11:1180–1185

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Young EJ (2005) Brucella species. In: Mandel GL, Bennett JE, Dolin R (eds) Mandell, Douglas and Bennett’s principles and practice of infectious diseases, 9th edn. Elsevier, Churchill, Livingstone, Philadelphia, pp 2669–2674

    Google Scholar 

  7. Banai MI, Mayer I, Cohen A (1990) Isolation, identification, and characterization in Israel of Brucella melitensis Biovar 1 atypical strains susceptible to dyes and penicillin, indicating the evolution of a new variant. J Clin Microbiol 28:1057–1059

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Wild CJ, Seeber GAF (1993) Comparing two proportions from the same survey. Am Stat 47:178–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Pappas G, Papadimitriou P, Akritidis N, Christou L, Tsianos EV (2006) The new global map of human brucellosis. Lancet Infect Dis 6:91–99

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Yagupsky P, Peled N, Press J, Abramson O, Abu-Rashid M (1997) Comparison of BACTEC 9240 Peds Plus medium and Isolator 1.5 Microbial Tube for detection of Brucella melitensis from blood cultures. J Clin Microbiol 35:1382–1384

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Centers for Disease Control and National Institutes of Health (1988) Biosafety in microbiological and biomedical laboratories, publication no. 17-40-508-3. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. Yagupsky.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shemesh, A.A., Yagupsky, P. Isolation rates of Brucella melitensis in an endemic area and implications for laboratory safety. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 31, 441–443 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-011-1325-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-011-1325-8

Keywords

Navigation