Advertisement

Clinical evaluation of the Copan ESwab for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus detection and culture of wounds

  • V. Saegeman
  • J. Flamaing
  • J. Muller
  • W. E. Peetermans
  • J. Stuyck
  • J. Verhaegen
Article

Abstract

The screening for and diagnosis of bacteriological infections often involves the collection and transportation of swab samples. The Copan ESwab was compared with the dry cotton Copan swab for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) screening (n = 200 paired samples) and with the Amies agar gel swab (Copan) for the sampling of burn and orthopaedic wounds (n = 203 paired samples) in terms of Gram staining and bacterial recovery. Gram stains performed with ESwab liquid showed significantly more Gram-negative rods, streptococci, Gram-positive cocci, Gram-positive rods, polymorphonuclear cells, lymphocytes and red blood cells than Gram stains from dry swabs. Bacterial recovery was significantly higher with ESwab (p < 0.01, for both MRSA screening and wounds, quantitative/semi-quantitative method). This lead to a slightly higher detection rate of MRSA (128 vs. 124 MRSA-positive ESwabs and dry swabs, respectively, p = 0.50) and a higher detection rate of coagulase-negative Staphylococcus spp. (44 isolates with ESwab vs. 29 with Amies gel swab, p = 0.001) and Enterococcus spp. (15 isolates with ESwab vs. 7 isolates with Amies gel swab, p = 0.005) with ESwab (quantitative method). We confirmed that ESwab has a high performance for Gram stains and a higher bacterial recovery than dry and Amies gel swabs when using clinical samples for MRSA screening and wound sampling.

Keywords

Mannitol Salt Agar Bacterial Recovery Bacterial Morphotypes Maldi BioTyper Rayon Swab 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgements

We sincerely thank Rudi Deleus (Intensive Care Unit Burn Wounds), Godelieve Nicaise, Raf Beneens and Bart Vander Elst (Geriatric Medicine), Marleen Van Eygen (General Internal Medicine) and Jan Bosque (Septic Orthopaedics) for their readiness to procure all of the clinical samples, and Jos Vandeven (Laboratory Medicine) for the help in the identification of the micro-organisms.

Both the ESwab MRSA Collection Kits and the conventional ESwabs were kindly provided by Copan.

Supplementary material

10096_2011_1178_MOESM1_ESM.doc (54 kb)
Fig. 3 (DOC 54 kb)
10096_2011_1178_MOESM2_ESM.doc (55 kb)
Fig. 4 (DOC 55 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Van Horn KG, Audette CD, Sebeck D, Tucker KA (2008) Comparison of the Copan ESwab system with two Amies agar swab transport systems for maintenance of microorganism viability. J Clin Microbiol 46(5):1655–1658PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Osterblad M, Järvinen H, Lönnqvist K, Huikko S, Laippala P, Viljanto J, Arvilommi H, Huovinen P (2003) Evaluation of a new cellulose sponge-tipped swab for microbiological sampling: a laboratory and clinical investigation. J Clin Microbiol 41:1894–1900PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Copan Innovation (2008) ESwab collection and transport system. Product insert and how to use guide. Copan Innovation, Brescia, ItalyGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Nys S, Vijgen S, Magerman K, Cartuyvels R (2010) Comparison of Copan eSwab with the Copan Venturi Transystem for the quantitative survival of Escherichia coli, Streptococcus agalactiae and Candida albicans. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 29:453–456PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Van Horn KG, Audette CD, Tucker KA, Sebeck D (2008) Comparison of 3 swab transport systems for direct release and recovery of aerobic and anaerobic bacteria. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 62:471–473PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Body B, Arbique J, Bourbeau P et al (2003) Quality Control of Microbiological Transport Systems; Clinical Laboratory and Standards Institute (CLSI) Approved Standard M40-A. Pennsylvania, PA, USA. Dec. report no.: M40-A, volume 23, number 34Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fontana C, Favaro M, Limongi D, Pivonkova J, Favalli C (2009) Comparison of the eSwab collection and transportation system to an amies gel transystem for Gram stain of clinical specimens. BMC Res Notes 2:244PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Daley P, Castriciano S, Chernesky M, Smieja M (2006) Comparison of flocked and rayon swabs for collection of respiratory epithelial cells from uninfected volunteers and symptomatic patients. J Clin Microbiol 44:2265–2267PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Loens K, Van Heirstraeten L, Malhotra-Kumar S, Goossens H, Ieven M (2009) Optimal sampling sites and methods for detection of pathogens possibly causing community-acquired lower respiratory tract infections. J Clin Microbiol 47(1):21–31PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Smismans A, Verhaegen J, Schuermans A, Frans J (2009) Evaluation of the Copan ESwab transport system for the detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: a laboratory and clinical study. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 65(2):108–111PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Human RP, Jones GA (2004) Evaluation of swab transport systems against a published standard. J Clin Pathol 57:762–763PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Human RP, Jones GA (2006) A new concept for transporting clinical material on flocked swabs in liquid Amies medium. In: Proceedings of the 106th General Meeting of the American Society for Microbiology (ASM), Orlando, FL, USA, 21–25 May 2006Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bourbeau PP, Swartz BL (2009) First evaluation of the WASP, a new automated microbiology plating instrument. J Clin Microbiol 47(4):1101–1106PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • V. Saegeman
    • 1
  • J. Flamaing
    • 2
  • J. Muller
    • 3
  • W. E. Peetermans
    • 4
  • J. Stuyck
    • 5
  • J. Verhaegen
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Medical Diagnostic SciencesUniversity Hospitals LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
  2. 2.Department of Geriatric MedicineUniversity Hospitals LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
  3. 3.Department of Intensive Care MedicineUniversity Hospitals LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
  4. 4.Department of Internal MedicineUniversity Hospitals LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
  5. 5.Department of Septic OrthopaedicsUniversity Hospitals LeuvenLeuvenBelgium

Personalised recommendations