Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Characterization of the best anatomical sites in screening for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus colonization

  • Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to identify differences in the sensitivity of anatomical sites sampling for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) colonization related to age, gender, clinical situation, and acquisition source as a base for screening protocols. We used a database that included all MRSA-positive cultures (Carmel Medical Center, 2003–2006) taken from nares, throat, perineum, and infection sites. The study population of 597 patients was divided into: “screening sample” (SS), which were cases of routine screening, and “clinical diagnostic sample” (CDS), which were patients with concurrent MRSA infection. MRSA acquisition sources were classified as internal medicine, surgical, referral patients, or intensive care unit (ICU). CDS patients were older than SS patients (median age 78 vs. 74 years, p = 0.0002), more commonly throat colonized (47.5% vs. 31.8%, p = 0.0001), and colonized in more multiple sites (65.7% vs. 43.3% were colonized in three sites in the CDS and SS groups, respectively, p < 0.001) than SS patients. In the SS, group throat colonization was higher in internal medicine wards than in the ICU (odds ratio [OR] = 3.98, p < 0.0001). In the CDS group, perineal colonization was more common in referral patients than in the ICU (OR = 4.52, p < 0.05). Patient age was the most influential factor on nares and multiple sites colonization in the SS and CDS groups, respectively. Our data support multiple sites sampling. Throat cultures are crucial in MRSA-infected patients and internal medicine ward patients. Multiple body sites colonization is more likely in older or MRSA-infected patients, affecting decisions regarding eradication using topical antibiotics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zhan C, Miller MR (2003) Excess length of stay, charges, and mortality attributable to medical injuries during hospitalization. JAMA 290:1868–1874

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Jevons MP (1961) Celbenin resistant staphylococci. Br Med J 1:124–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Biedenbach DJ, Moet GJ, Jones RN (2004) Occurrence and antimicrobial resistance pattern comparisons among bloodstream infection isolates from the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program (1997–2002). Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 50:59–69

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Rosenthal VD, Maki DG, Mehta A, Alvarez-Moreno C, Leblebicioglu H, Higuera F et al (2008) International Nosocomial Infection Control Consortium report, data summary for 2002–2007, issued January 2008. Am J Infect Control 36:627–637

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cosgrove SE, Sakoulas G, Perencevich EN, Schwaber MJ, Karchmer AW, Carmeli Y (2003) Comparison of mortality associated with methicillin-resistant and methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia: a meta-analysis. Clin Infect Dis 36:53–59

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Whitby M, McLaws ML, Berry G (2001) Risk of death from methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia: a meta-analysis. Med J Aust 175:264–267

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cosgrove SE, Qi Y, Kaye KS, Harbarth S, Karchmer AW, Carmeli Y (2005) The impact of methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia on patient outcomes: mortality, length of stay, and hospital charges. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 26:166–174

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Abramson MA, Sexton DJ (1999) Nosocomial methicillin-resistant and methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus primary bacteremia: at what costs? Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 20:408–411

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Davis KA, Stewart JJ, Crouch HK, Florez CE, Hospenthal DR (2004) Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) nares colonization at hospital admission and its effect on subsequent MRSA infection. Clin Infect Dis 39:776–782

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Mest DR, Wong DH, Shimoda KJ, Mulligan ME, Wilson SE (1994) Nasal colonization with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus on admission to the surgical intensive care unit increases the risk of infection. Anesth Analg 78:644–650

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Pujol M, Peña C, Pallares R, Ariza J, Ayats J, Dominguez MA et al (1996) Nosocomial Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia among nasal carriers of methicillin-resistant and methicillin-susceptible strains. Am J Med 100:509–516

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Morange-Saussier V, Giraudeau B, van der Mee N, Lermusiaux P, Quentin R (2006) Nasal carriage of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in vascular surgery. Ann Vasc Surg 20:767–772

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Girou E, Pujade G, Legrand P, Cizeau F, Brun-Buisson C (1998) Selective screening of carriers for control of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in high-risk hospital areas with a high level of endemic MRSA. Clin Infect Dis 27:543–550

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Chaix C, Durand-Zaleski I, Alberti C, Brun-Buisson C (1999) Control of endemic methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: a cost–benefit analysis in an intensive care unit. JAMA 282:1745–1751

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Barakate MS, Yang YX, Foo SH, Vickery AM, Sharp CA, Fowler LD et al (2000) An epidemiological survey of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a tertiary referral hospital. J Hosp Infect 44:19–26

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lucet JC, Chevret S, Durand-Zaleski I, Chastang C, Régnier B (2003) Prevalence and risk factors for carriage of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus at admission to the intensive care unit: results of a multicenter study. Arch Intern Med 163:181–188

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Jernigan JA, Clemence MA, Stott GA, Titus MG, Alexander CH, Palumbo CM et al (1995) Control of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus at a university hospital: one decade later. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 16:686–696

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Oztoprak N, Cevik MA, Akinci E, Korkmaz M, Erbay A, Eren SS et al (2006) Risk factors for ICU-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections. Am J Infect Control 34:1–5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Gorak EJ, Yamada SM, Brown JD (1999) Community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in hospitalized adults and children without known risk factors. Clin Infect Dis 29:797–800

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Bratu S, Landman D, Gupta J, Trehan M, Panwar M, Quale J (2006) A population-based study examining the emergence of community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus USA300 in New York City. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob 5:29

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kenner J, O’Connor T, Piantanida N, Fishbain J, Eberly B, Viscount H et al (2003) Rates of carriage of methicillin-resistant and methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus in an outpatient population. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 24:439–444

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Salgado CD, Farr BM, Calfee DP (2003) Community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: a meta-analysis of prevalence and risk factors. Clin Infect Dis 36:131–139

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Salgado CD, Farr BM (2006) What proportion of hospital patients colonized with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus are identified by clinical microbiological cultures? Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 27:116–121

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Shitrit P, Gottesman BS, Katzir M, Kilman A, Ben-Nissan Y, Chowers M (2006) Active surveillance for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) decreases the incidence of MRSA bacteremia. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 27:1004–1008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Rubinovitch B, Pittet D (2001) Screening for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in the endemic hospital: what have we learned? J Hosp Infect 47:9–18

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Huang SS, Yokoe DS, Hinrichsen VL, Spurchise LS, Datta R, Miroshnik I et al (2006) Impact of routine intensive care unit surveillance cultures and resultant barrier precautions on hospital-wide methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. Clin Infect Dis 43:971–978

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Papia G, Louie M, Tralla A, Johnson C, Collins V, Simor AE (1999) Screening high-risk patients for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus on admission to the hospital: is it cost effective? Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 20:473–477

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Nijssen S, Bonten MJ, Weinstein RA (2005) Are active microbiological surveillance and subsequent isolation needed to prevent the spread of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus? Clin Infect Dis 40:405–409

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Sanford MD, Widmer AF, Bale MJ, Jones RN, Wenzel RP (1994) Efficient detection and long-term persistence of the carriage of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Clin Infect Dis 19:1123–1128

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Coello R, Jiménez J, García M, Arroyo P, Minguez D, Fernández C et al (1994) Prospective study of infection, colonization and carriage of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in an outbreak affecting 990 patients. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 13:74–81

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Eveillard M, de Lassence A, Lancien E, Barnaud G, Ricard JD, Joly-Guillou ML (2006) Evaluation of a strategy of screening multiple anatomical sites for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus at admission to a teaching hospital. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 27:181–184

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Nilsson P, Ripa T (2006) Staphylococcus aureus throat colonization is more frequent than colonization in the anterior nares. J Clin Microbiol 44:3334–3339

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Ringberg H, Cathrine Petersson A, Walder M, Hugo Johansson PJ (2006) The throat: an important site for MRSA colonization. Scand J Infect Dis 38:888–893

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) (2005) Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing; 15th informational supplement M2-A8 and M7-A6. NCCLS, Wayne, PA

  35. Garner JS, Jarvis WR, Emori TG, Horan TC, Hughes JM (1988) CDC definitions for nosocomial infections, 1988. Am J Infect Control 16:128–140

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Rosner B (1990) Fundamentals of biostatistics, 3rd edn. PWS-Kent Publishing Company, Boston, MA

    Google Scholar 

  37. Thompson ML, Zucchini W (1989) On the statistical analysis of ROC curves. Stat Med 8:1277–1290

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Meurman O, Routamaa M, Peltonen R (2005) Screening for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: which anatomical sites to culture? J Hosp Infect 61:351–353

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. Weber.

Additional information

Financial support

No financial support is declared.

Conflicts of interest

None declared.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bitterman, Y., Laor, A., Itzhaki, S. et al. Characterization of the best anatomical sites in screening for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus colonization. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 29, 391–397 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-009-0869-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-009-0869-3

Keywords

Navigation