Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluating the resistance to posaconazole by E-test and CLSI broth microdilution methodologies of Candida spp. and pathogenic moulds

  • Brief Report
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

E-test methodology was compared with Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) broth microdilution, particularly concerning the detection of resistance to posaconazole among clinical fungal isolates. The susceptibility of a large set of fungal strains (n = 300) was evaluated following 24 and 48 h in two different culture media (RPMI 1640 and Sabouraud agar). Fungal strains were highly susceptible to posaconazole; however, few less susceptible strains were found, mostly regarding Candida albicans, Candida glabrata, Acremonium sp., Cladosporium sp. and Scedosporium apiospermum. Broth microdilution and E-test methods provided similar results for posaconazole-susceptible strains, while the less susceptible fungal strains (10.3% of the strains showed MIC ≥2 µg/mL) resulted in higher discrepancies between the two methodologies, particularly concerning Candida spp. E-test susceptibility values were critically affected by the pH of the culture media. Sabouraud medium provided similar susceptibility results for moulds to those for RPMI, soon after 24 h. Posaconazole resistance was rare in this study, but routine susceptibility methods, such as the E-test, should be able to detect fungal strains with reduced susceptibility. E-test methodology still needs improvements to recognise accurately strains less susceptible to posaconazole.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Diekema DJ, Messer SA, Hollis RJ et al (2007) Evaluation of Etest and disk diffusion methods compared with broth microdilution antifungal susceptibility testing of clinical isolates of Candida spp. against posaconazole. J Clin Microbiol 45:1974–1977. doi:10.1128/JCM.02087-06

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Barry AL, Pfaller MA, Brown SD et al (2000) Quality control limits for broth microdilution susceptibility tests of ten antifungal agents. J Clin Microbiol 38:3457–3459

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Chaturvedi V, Ramani R, Ghannoum MA et al (2008) Multilaboratory testing of antifungal combinations against a quality control isolate of Candida krusei. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 5:1500–1502. doi:10.1128/AAC.00574-07

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (2008) Reference method for broth dilution antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts: approved standard, 3rd edn. M27-A3. CLSI, Wayne, PA

    Google Scholar 

  5. Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (2008) Reference method for broth dilution antifungals susceptibility testing of conidium-forming filamentous fungi: approved standard, 2nd edn. M38-A2. CLSI, Wayne, PA

    Google Scholar 

  6. Guinea J, Peláez T, Alcalá L et al (2007) Correlation between the E-test and the CLSI —38 A microdilution method to determine the activity of amphotericin B, voriconazole, and itraconazole against clinical isolates of Aspergillus fumigatus. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 57:273–276. doi:10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2006.09.003

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Sims CR, Paetznick VL, Rodriguez JR et al (2006) Correlation between microdilution, E-test, and disk diffusion methods for antifungal susceptibility testing of posaconazole against Candida spp. J Clin Microbiol 44:2105–2108. doi:10.1128/JCM.02591-05

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Pfaller MA, Messer SA, Boyken L et al (2008) Selection of a surrogate agent (fluconazole or voriconazole) for initial susceptibility testing of posaconazole against Candida spp.: results from a global antifungal surveillance program. J Clin Microbiol 46:551–559. doi:10.1128/JCM.01952-07

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Espinel-Ingroff A, Arthington-Skaggs B, Iqbal N et al (2007) Multicenter evaluation of a new disk agar diffusion method for susceptibility testing of filamentous fungi with voriconazole, posaconazole, itraconazole, amphotericin B, and caspofungin. J Clin Microbiol 45:1811–1820. doi:10.1128/JCM.00134-07

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Messer SA, Diekema DJ, Hollis RJ et al (2007) Evaluation of disk diffusion and Etest compared to broth microdilution for antifungal susceptibility testing of posaconazole against clinical isolates of filamentous fungi. J Clin Microbiol 45:1322–1324. doi:10.1128/JCM.02450-06

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Espinel-Ingroff A (2006) Comparison of three commercial assays and a modified disk diffusion assay with two broth microdilution reference assays for testing zygomycetes, Aspergillus spp., Candida spp., and Cryptococcus neoformans with posaconazole and amphotericin B. J Clin Microbiol 43:3616–3622. doi:10.1128/JCM.01187-06

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Alexander BD, Byrne TC, Smith KL et al (2007) Comparative evaluation of Etest and sensititre yeastone panels against the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute M27–A2 reference broth microdilution method for testing Candida susceptibility to seven antifungal agents. J Clin Microbiol 45:698–706. doi:10.1128/JCM.01840-06

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Costa-de-Oliveira S, Pina-Vaz C, Mendonça D et al (2008) A first Portuguese epidemiological survey of fungaemia in a university hospital. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 27:365–374. doi:10.1007/s10096-007-0448-4

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Pfaller MA, Messer SA, Mills K et al (2001) Evaluation of Etest method for determining posaconazole MICs for 314 clinical isolates of Candida species. J Clin Microbiol 39:3952–3954. doi:10.1128/JCM.39.11.3952-3954.2001

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Meletiadis J, Meis JF, Mouton JW et al (2001) Analysis of growth characteristics of filamentous fungi in different nutrient media. J Clin Microbiol 39:478–484. doi:10.1128/JCM.39.2.478-484.2001

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Te Dorsthorst DT, Mouton JW, van den Beukel CJ et al (2004) Effect of pH on the in vitro activities of amphotericin B, itraconazole, and flucytosine against Aspergillus isolates. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 48:3147–3150. doi:10.1128/AAC.48.8.3147-3150.2004

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to Maria Luz Dias for the excellent technical assistance on susceptibility testing and to the two reviewers who made valuable suggestions that considerably improved the manuscript. RA, SCO and IC received grants from Fundação para Ciência e Tecnologia (FCT). IPATIMUP is partially supported by FCT, Programa Operacional Ciência e Inovação (POCI) and Programa Operacional do Potencial Humano (POPH – QREN).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Araujo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Araujo, R., Costa-de-Oliveira, S., Coutinho, I. et al. Evaluating the resistance to posaconazole by E-test and CLSI broth microdilution methodologies of Candida spp. and pathogenic moulds. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 28, 1137–1140 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-009-0736-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-009-0736-2

Keywords

Navigation