Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Interference of antibiotic therapy on blood cultures time-to-positivity: analysis of a 5-year experience in an oncological hospital

  • Concise Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study performed a retrospective analysis on the relationship between blood culture time-to-positivity (TP) and type of isolated microorganism, antibiotic administration, and immunological status of the patients. We analyzed the data related to 1,218 positive blood cultures. When compared to Gram positive bacteraemia, the percentage of Gram negative growth was higher and the mean TP significantly shorter (p < 0.0001). In patients receiving antibiotics, median and mean TPs of blood culture were different for Gram positive bacteraemia (log-rank p = 0.0022, Wilcoxon p < 0.0001) but not for Gram negative (log-rank p = 0.4011, Wilcoxon p = 0.1585). No statistically significant effect on TP was found for sampling site, interaction between sampling site and antibiotic administration, and immunological status of the patient. In conclusion, TP is independent of antibiotic therapy in cases of Gram negative bacteraemia, while for Gram positive bacteraemia a prolongation of TP occurs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Raad I, Hanna HA, Maki DG (2007) Intravascular catheter-related infections: advances in diagnosis, prevention, and management. Lancet Infect Dis 7:645–657. doi:10.1016/S1473–3099(07)70235–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Maki DG, Weise CE, Sarafin HW (1997) A semiquantitative culture method for identifying intravenous-catheter-related infection. N Engl J Med 296:1305–1309

    Google Scholar 

  3. Mermel LA, Farr BM, Sherertz RJ, Raad I, O’Grady N, Harris JS et al (2001) Guidelines for the management of intravascular catheter-related infections. Clin Infect Dis 32:1249–1272. doi:10.1086/320001

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Pearson ML (1996) Guideline for prevention of intravascular device-related infections. Hospital infection control practices advisory committee. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 17:438–473

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Padberg FT Jr, Ruggiero J, Blackburn GL, Bistrian BR (1981) Central venous catheterization for parenteral nutrition. Ann Surg 193:264–270

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ryan JA, Abel RM, Abbott WM, Hopkins CC, Chesney TM, Colley R et al (1974) Catheter complications in total parenteral nutrition. A prospective study of 200 consecutive patients. N Engl J Med 290:757–761

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Blot F, Schmidt E, Nitenberg G, Tancrede C, Leclercq B, Laplanche A et al (1998) Earlier positivity of central-venous- versus peripheral-blood cultures is highly predictive of catheter-related sepsis. J Clin Microbiol 36(1):105–109

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Blot F, Nitenberg G, Chachatty E, Raynard B, Germann N, Antoun S et al (1999) Diagnosis of catheter-related bacteraemia: a prospective comparison of the time to positivity of hub-blood versus peripheral-blood cultures. Lancet 354(9184):1071–1077. doi:10.1016/S0140–6736(98)11134–0

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Raad I, Hanna HA, Alakech B, Chatzinikolaou I, Johnson MM (2004) Differential time to positivity: a useful method for diagnosing catheter-related bloodstream infections. Ann Intern Med 140:18–25

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Cockerill FR, Wilson JW, Vetter EA, Goodman KM, Torgerson CA, Harmsen WS et al (2004) Optimal testing parameters for blood cultures. Clin Infect Dis 38:1724–1730. doi:10.1086/421087

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lee A, Mirrett S, Reller LB, Weinstein MP (2007) Detection of bloodstream infections in adults: how many blood cultures are needed? J Clin Microbiol 45(11):3546–3548. doi:10.1128/JCM.01555–07

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Newcombe RG (1998) Interval estimation for the difference between independent proportions: comparison of eleven methods. Stat Med 17:873–890

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Rao CR (1971) Estimation of variance and covariance components: MINQUE theory. J Multivariate Anal 1:257–275. doi:10.1016/0047–259X(71)90001–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Martinez JA, Pozo L, Almela M, Marco F, Soriano A, Lopez F et al (2007) Microbial and clinical determinants of time-to-positivity in patients with bacteraemia. Clin Microbiol Infect 13(7):709–716. doi:10.1111/j.1469–0691.2007.01736.x

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ruimy R, Armand-Lefevre L, Andremont A (2005) Short time to positivity in blood culture with clustered gram-positive cocci on direct smear examination is highly predictive of Staphylococcus aureus. Am J Infect Control 33:304–306. doi:10.1016/j.ajic.2005.03.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to the technicians Lorena Moretti and Valentina Urso for their valuable collaboration, and to Mara Jo Miller for her kind review of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Passerini.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Passerini, R., Riggio, D., Radice, D. et al. Interference of antibiotic therapy on blood cultures time-to-positivity: analysis of a 5-year experience in an oncological hospital. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 28, 95–98 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-008-0594-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-008-0594-3

Keywords

Navigation