Skip to main content
Log in

Catheter-related bacteremia from femoral and central internal jugular venous access

  • Concise Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The objective of this prospective observational study was to determine the influence of femoral and central internal jugular venous catheters on the incidence of catheter-related bacteremia (CRB). We included patients admitted to a 12-bed polyvalent medico-surgical intensive care unit over 4 years who received one or more femoral or central internal jugular venous catheters. We diagnosed 16 cases of CRB in 208 femoral catheters and 22 in 515 central internal jugular venous catheters. We found a higher incidence of CRB with femoral (9.52 per 1,000 catheter days) than with central internal jugular venous access (4.83 per 1,000 catheter days; risk ratio = 1.93; 95% confidence interval: 1.03–3.73; P = 0.04). Central internal jugular venous access could be considered a safer route of venous access than femoral access in minimizing the risk of central venous catheter-related bacteremia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Spengler RF, Greenough WB (1978) Hospital costs and mortality attributed to nosocomial bacteremias. JAMA 240:2455–2458

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Pittet D, Tarara D, Wenzel R (1994) Nosocomial bloodstream infection in critically ill patients. Excess length of stay, extra costs and attributable mortality. JAMA 271:1598–1601

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Smith RL, Meixler SM, Simberkoff MS (1991) Excess mortality in critically ill patients with nosocomial bloodstream infections. Chest 100:164–167

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Collignon PJ (1994) Intravascular catheter associated sepsis: a common problem. The Australian Study on Intravascular Catheter Associated Sepsis. Med J Aust 161:374–378

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Collignon P, Soni N, Pearson I, Sorrell T, Woods P (1988) Sepsis associated with central vein catheters in critically ill patients. Intensive Care Med 14:227–231

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Goetz AM, Wagener MM, Miller JM, Muder RR (1998) Risk of infection due to central venous catheters: effect of site of placement and catheter type. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 19:842–845

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Deshpande KS, Hatem C, Ulrich HL et al (2005) The incidence of infectious complications of central venous catheters at the subclavian, internal jugular, and femoral sites in an intensive care unit population. Crit Care Med 33:13–20

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kemp L, Burge J, Choban P, Harden J, Mirtallo J, Flancbaum L (1994) The effect of catheter type and site on infection rates in total parenteral nutrition patients. J Parenter Enteral Nutr 18:71–74

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Lorente L, Villegas J, Martin MM, Jimenez A, Mora ML (2004) Catheter-related infection in critically ill patients. Intensive Care Med 30:1681–1684

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lorente L, Henry C, Martin MM, Jimenez A, Mora ML (2005) Central venous catheter-related infection in a prospective and observational study of 2595 catheters. Crit Care 9:R631–R635

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lorente L, Jiménez A, Castedo J et al (2007) Internal jugular venous catheter-related bacteremia according to central and posterior accesses. Intensive Care Med 33:1071–1075

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lorente L, Huidobro MS, Martin MM, Jimenez A, Mora ML (2004) Accidental catheter removal in critically ill patients: a prospective and observational study. Critical Care 8:R229–R233

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Maki DG, Weise CE, Sarafin HW (1977) A semiquantitative culture method for identifying intravenous catheter-related infection. N Engl J Med 296:1305–1309

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Mermel LA, McCormick RD, Springman SR, Maki DG (1991) The pathogenesis and epidemiology of catheter-related infection with pulmonary artery Swan-Ganz catheters: a prospective study utilizing molecular subtyping. Am J Med 91:197–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Heard SO, Wagle M, Vijayakumar E et al (1998) Influence of triple-lumen central venous catheters coated with chlorhexidine and silver sulfadiazine on the incidence of catheter-related bacteremia. Arch Intern Med 158:81–87

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Moro ML, Vigano EF, Cozzi A (1994) Risk factors for central venous catheter-related infections in surgical and intensive care units. The Central Venous Catheter Related Infections Study Group. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 15:253–264

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (1997) Guidelines for prevention of nosocomial pneumonia. MMWR Recomm Rep 46:1–79

    Google Scholar 

  18. Bozzetti F, Terno G, Camerini E, Baticci F, Scarpa D, Pupa A (1982) Pathogenesis and predictability of central venous catheter sepsis. Surgery 91:383–389

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Pearson ML (1996) Guideline for prevention of intravascular device-related infections. The Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Am J Infect Control 24:262–293

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. O’Grady NP, Alexander M, Dellinger EP, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention et al (2002) Guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections. MMWR Recomm Rep 5:1–29

    Google Scholar 

  21. León M, García M, Herranz MA et al (1998) Diagnostic value of Gram staining of peri-catheter skin and the connection in the prediction of intravascular-catheter-related bacteremia. Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin 16(5):214–218

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Salzman MB, Isenberg HD, Shapiro JF, Lipsitz PJ, Rubin LG (1993) A prospective study of the catheter hub as the portal of entry for microorganisms causing catheter-related sepsis in neonates. J Infect Dis 167(2):487–490

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. León C, Alvarez-Lerma F, Ruiz-Santana S et al (2003) Antiseptic chamber-containing hub reduces central venous catheter-related infection: a prospective, randomized study. Crit Care Med 31(5):1318–1324

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Segura M, Alvarez-Lerma F, Tellado JM et al (1996) A clinical trial on the prevention of catheter-related sepsis using a new hub model. Ann Surg 223(4):363–369

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Halpin DP, O’Byrne P, McEntee G, Hennessy TP, Stephens RB (1991) Effect of a betadine connection shield on central venous catheter sepsis. Nutrition 7(1):33–34

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Niël-Weise BS, Daha TJ, van den Broek PJ (2006) Is there evidence for recommending needleless closed catheter access systems in guidelines? A systematic review of randomized controlled trials. J Hosp Infect 62(4):406–413

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Richet H, Hubert B, Nitemberg G et al (1990) Prospective multicenter study of vascular-catheter-related complications and risk factors for positive central-catheter culture in intensive care unit patients. J Clin Microbiol 28(11):2520–2525

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Gil RT, Kruse JA, Thill-Baharozian MC, Carlosn RW (1989) Triple- vs single-lumen central venous catheters. A prospective study in a critically ill population. Arch Intern Med 149(5):1139–1143

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Damen J, Verhoef J, Bolton DT et al (1985) Microbiologic risk of invasive hemodynamic monitoring in patients undergoing open-heart operation. Crit Care Med 13:548–555

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Brun-Buisson C, Abrouk F, Legrand P, Huet Y, Larabi S, Rapin M (1987) Diagnosis of central venous catheter-related sepsis. Critical level of quantitative tip cultures. Arch Intern Med 147(5):873–877

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Laura R, Degl’Innocenti M, Mocali M et al (2000) Comparison of two different time interval protocols for central venous catheter dressing in bone marrow transplant patients: results of a randomized, multicenter study. The Italian Nurse Bone Marrow Transplant Group (GITMO). Haematologica 85:275–279

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Engervall P, Ringertz S, Hagman E, Skogman K, Bjorkholm M (1995) Change of central venous catheter dressings twice a week is superior to once a week in patients with haematological malignancies. J Hosp Infect 29:275–286

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L. Lorente.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lorente, L., Jiménez, A., García, C. et al. Catheter-related bacteremia from femoral and central internal jugular venous access. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 27, 867–871 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-008-0507-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-008-0507-5

Keywords

Navigation