Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of different methods to detect oxacillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus and their clinical laboratory utility

  • Brief Report
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Chambers HF (1997) Methicillin resistance in staphylococci: molecular and biochemical basis and clinical implications. Clin Microbiol Rev 10:781–791

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. de Lancastre H, de Jonge BL, Mathews PR, Tomasz A (1994) Molecular aspects of methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. J Antimicrob Chemother 33:7–24

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. York MK, Gibbs L, Chehab F, Brooks GF (1996) Comparison of PCR detection of mecA with standard susceptibility testing methods to determine methicillin resistance in coagulase-negative staphylococci. J Clin Microbiol 34:249–253

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Berger-Bachi B (1995) Factors affecting methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. Int J Antimicrob Agents 6:13–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Velasco D, Tomas MM, Cartelle M et al (2005) Evaluation of different methods for detecting methicillin (oxacillin) resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. J Antimicrob Chemother 4:379–382

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Skov RL, Pallasen LV, Poulsen RL, Espersen F (1999) Evaluation of a 3-h hybridization method for detecting the mecA gene in Staphylococcus aureus and comparison with existing genotypic and phenotypic susceptibility testing methods. J Antimicrob Chemother 43:467–475

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (2004) Performance standards for antimicrobial disk susceptibility testing. Fourteenth informational supplement. M100-S14. NCCLS, Villanova, Pennsylvania

  8. Cauwelier B, Gordts B, Descheemaecker P, Van Landuyt H (2004) Evaluation of a disk diffusion method with cefoxitin (30 μg) for detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 23:389–392

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Felten A, Grandry B, Lagrange PH, Casin I (2002) Evaluation of three techniques for detection of low-level methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA): a disk diffusion method with cefoxitin and monolactam, the Vitek 2 system, and the MRSA-screen latex agglutination test. J Clin Microbiol 40:2766–2771

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Nicolas F, Bantar C, Canigia F, Rellosa S, Bianchini H, Smayevsky J (2000) Comparasion of several methods to determine methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 36:91–93

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by a grant from the Research Foundation of Suleyman Demirel University, Isparta, Turkey.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. Boşgelmez-Tınaz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Boşgelmez-Tınaz, G., Ulusoy, S., Arıdoğan, B. et al. Evaluation of different methods to detect oxacillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus and their clinical laboratory utility. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 25, 410–412 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-006-0153-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-006-0153-8

Keywords

Navigation