Skip to main content
Log in

Multiplex PCR-ELISA for direct detection of MRSA in nasal swabs advantageous for rapid identification of non-MRSA carriers

  • Concise Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the study presented here 251 nasal swabs obtained from medical staff were directly investigated for MRSA using a commercial multiplex PCR system in parallel with conventional culture methods to determine the usefulness of PCR for rapid screening. Both methods identified 3.2% (8/251) of specimens as MRSA-positive; one sample was culture-positive only, and three were PCR-positive only. PCR correctly identified 215 of 239 (90%) negative swab samples, but one sample with weak cultural growth was not detected and was therefore considered false negative. The comparative sensitivity of culture versus PCR was 75% (9/12) versus 91.6% (11/12). Although PCR had a low positive predictive value (31.4%) its negative predictive value was high (99.5%). The results of this study indicate the multiplex PCR is suitable for the rapid identification of MRSA-negative individuals directly from nasal swabs in populations with a low MRSA prevalence, but positive results need to be confirmed by culture.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Doebbeling BN (1995) The epidemiology of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection and colonization. J Chemother 7(Suppl 3):99–103

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lowy FD (1998) Staphylococcus aureus infections. N Engl J Med 339:520–532

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Lye WC, Leong SO, Lee EJ (1993) Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus nasal carriage and infections in CAPD. Kidney Int 43:1357–1362

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Papia G, Louie M, Tralla A, Johnson C, Collins V, Simor AE (1999) Screening high-risk patients for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus on admission to the hospital: is it cost-effective? Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 20:473–477

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bignardi GE, Woodford N, Chapman A, Johnson AP, Speller DC (1996) Detection of the mecA gene and phenotypic detection of resistance in Staphylococcus aureus isolates with borderline or low-level methicillin resistance. J Antimicrob Chemother 37:53–63

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Jonas D, Grundmann H, Hartung D, Daschner FD, Towner KJ (1999) Evaluation of the mecA femB Duplex Polymerase Chain Reaction for detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 18:643–647

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Teare EL, Barrett SP (1997) Is it time to stop searching for MRSA? Stop the ritual of tracing colonized people. Br Med J 314:665–666

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Schmitz FJ, MacKenzie CR, Hofmann B, Verhoef J, Finken-Eigen M, Heinz HP, Kohrer K (1997) Specific information concerning taxonomy, pathogenicity and methicillin-resistance of staphylococci obtained by a multiplex PCR. J Med Microbiol 46:773–778

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to O. Assadian.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Daeschlein, G., Assadian, O., Daxboeck, F. et al. Multiplex PCR-ELISA for direct detection of MRSA in nasal swabs advantageous for rapid identification of non-MRSA carriers. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 25, 328–330 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-006-0131-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-006-0131-1

Keywords

Navigation