Skip to main content

Sensitivity of urinary antigen test in relation to clinical severity in a large outbreak of Legionella pneumonia in Spain

Abstract

Presented here are the results of Legionella urinary antigen testing correlated with patient characteristics and severity of pneumonia (Fine score) in 295 patients diagnosed with Legionella pneumonia in connection with a large outbreak in Murcia, Spain. Overall, the sensitivity of the urinary antigen test was 47.7% (141/295). A statistically significant association was found between the clinical severity of pneumonia and test sensitivity; 85.7% for patients with severe pneumonia versus 37.9% for patients with mild pneumonia (risk ratio, 2.3). Variables significantly associated with test positivity in multivariate analysis were as follows: pre-existing pulmonary disease, body temperature >40°C, leukocytosis and multilobar infiltrates. Patients with mild pneumonia may go undiagnosed if the urinary antigen test is used alone.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Berdal BP, Farshy CE, Feeley JC (1979) Detection of Legionella pneumophila antigen in urine by enzyme-linked immunospecific assay. J Clin Microbiol 9:575–578

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Edelstein PH (1987) Laboratory diagnosis of infections caused by legionellae. Eur J Clin Microbiol 6:4–10

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Winn WC Jr (1995) Legionella. In: Murray PR, Baron EJ, Pfaller MA, Tenover FC, Yolken RH (eds) Manual of clinical microbiology, 6th edn. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, DC, pp 533–544

    Google Scholar 

  4. García-Fulgueiras A, Navarro C, Fenoll D, Garcia J, Gonzalez-Diego P, Jimenez-Bunuelas T, Rodriguez M, Lopez R, Pacheco F, Ruiz J, Segovia M, Balandron B, Pelaz C (2003) Legionnaires’ disease outbreak in Murcia, Spain. Emerg Infect Dis 9:915–921

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Fine MJ, Auble TE, Yealy DM, Hanusa BH, Weissfeld LA, Singer DE, Coley CM, Marrie TJ, Kapoor WN (1997) A prediction rule to identify low-risk patients with community-acquired pneumonia. N Engl J Med 336:243–250

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Marks JS, Tsai TF, Martone WJ, et al (1979) Nosocomial Legionnaies’ disease in Columbus, Ohio. Ann Intern Med 90:565–569

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. World Health Organization (1990) Epidemiology, prevention and control of legionellosis: memorandum from a WHO meeting. WHO Bulletin OMS 68:155–164

    Google Scholar 

  8. Guerrero C, Toldos CM, Yague G, Ramirez C, Rodriguez T, Segovia M (2004) Comparison of diagnostic sensitivities of three assays (Bartels Enzyme Immunoassay [EIA], Biotest EIA, and Binax NOW Immunochromatographic Test) for detection of Legionella pneumophila serogroup 1 antigen in urine. J Clin Microbiol 42:467–468

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lopez P, Chinchilla A, Andreu M, Pelaz C, Sastre J (2001) El laboratorio de Microbiología Clínica en el brote de Legionella spp. en la comarca de Alcoy: Rentabilidad de las Diferentes Técnicas Diagnósticas. Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin 19:435–438

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Formica N, Yates M, Brees M, Carnie J, Hogg G, Ryan N, Tallis G (2001) The impact of diagnosis by Legionella urinary antigen test on the epidemiology and outcomes of Legionnaires’ disease. Epidemiol Infect 127:275–280

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hackman BA, Plouffe JF, Benson RF, Fields BS, Breiman RF (1996) Comparison of Binax Legionella urinary antigen EIA kit with Binax RIA urinary antigen kit for detection of Legionella pneumophila serogroup 1 antigen. J Clin Microbiol 34:1579–1580

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Helbig JH, Uldum SA, Luck PC, Harrison TG (2001) Detection of Legionella pneumophila antigen in urine samples by the BinaxNOW immunochromatographic assay and comparison with both Binax Legionella urinary enzyme immunoassay (EIA) and Biotest Legionella urinary antigen EIA. J Med Microbiol 50:509–516

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Domínguez JA, Gali N, Pedroso P, Fargas A, Padilla E, Manterola JM, Matas L (1998) Comparison of the Binax Legionella urinary antigen enzyme immunoassay (EIA) with the Biotest Legionella urinary antigen EIA for detection of Legionella antigen in both concentrated and nonconcentrated urine samples. J Clin Microbiol 36:2718–2722

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Wever PC, Yzerman EPF, Kuijper EJ, Speelman P, Dankert J (2000) Rapid diagnosis of Legionnaires’ disease using an immunochromatographic assay for Legionella pneumophila serogroup 1 antigen in urine during an outbreak in The Netherlands. J Clin Microbiol 38:2738–2739

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Yzerman PF, den Boer JW, Lettinga KD, Schellekens J, Dankert J, Peeters M (2002) Sensitivity of three urinary antigen tests associated with clinical severity in a large outbreak of Legionnaires’ disease in The Netherlands. J Clin Microbiol 40:3232–3236

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank the treating physicians and microbiologists for their collaboration and Dr. T. Fernández for advice on the statistical analyses

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. M. Blázquez.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Blázquez, R.M., Espinosa, F.J., Martínez-Toldos, C.M. et al. Sensitivity of urinary antigen test in relation to clinical severity in a large outbreak of Legionella pneumonia in Spain. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 24, 488–491 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-005-1361-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-005-1361-3

Keywords

  • Urinary Antigen
  • Legionellosis
  • Urinary Antigen Test
  • Paired Seron
  • Urinary Antigen Detection