Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of the current National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards guidelines for screening and confirming extended-spectrum beta-lactamase production in isolates of Escherichia coli and Klebsiella species from bacteremic patients

  • Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) recommendations for screening and confirming the production of extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBLs) were evaluated in 115 isolates of Escherichia coli and 157 isolates of Klebsiella spp. from Israeli patients with bacteremia. All isolates were screened using cefotaxime, ceftazidime, and cefpodoxime discs. Confirmatory tests using pairs of discs containing ceftazidime, cefotaxime, or cefpodoxime in which clavulanic acid was added to one of the discs in each pair [inhibitor-potentiated disc diffusion test (IPDDT)] and two double-sided E test strips containing ceftazidime or cefotaxime with and without clavulanic acid were performed on all isolates regardless of the results of screening tests. Isolates that tested positive by one or more confirmatory tests were considered ESBL producers. Overall, 69 (25.4%) strains were found to be ESBL producers. The sensitivity of the NCCLS screening criteria ranged between 98.6% for cefotaxime and 92.8% for ceftazidime, and the specificity ranged between 100% for cefotaxime and cefpodoxime and 99.0% for ceftazidime. The sensitivity of the confirmatory tests ranged between 97.1% for the cefotaxime E test and only 75.4% for the ceftazidime IPDDT discs. All 64 isolates that fell in the intermediate and resistant categories for cefotaxime, as well as all 41 in the same categories for ceftazidime and 68 of 69 in these categories for cefpodoxime, were confirmed as ESBL producers. The use of multiple antimicrobial discs for screening isolates and combinations of IPPDT discs is needed to improve the sensitivity of confirmatory testing. It is recommended that isolates falling in the intermediate and resistant categories in disc diffusion testing be reported as ESBL producers. The use of confirmatory tests should be limited to organisms with inhibition zone diameters ranging between the NCCLS recommendations for ESBL screening and the intermediate category breakpoints.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cormican MG, Marshall SA, Jones RN (1996) Detection of extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing strains by the E test ESBL screen. J Clin Microbiol 34:1880–1884

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Jacoby GA, Han P (1996) Detection of extended-spectrum β-lactamases in clinical isolates of Klebsiella pneumoniae and Escherichia coli. J Clin Microbiol 34:908–911

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Livermore DM, Brown DFJ (2001) Detection of β-lactamase-mediated resistance. J Antimicrob Chemother 48 (Suppl S1):59–64

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Vercautern E, Desheemaeker P, Ieven M, Sanders CC, Goossens H (1997) Comparison of screening methods for detection of extended-spectrum β-lactamases and their prevalence among blood isolates of Escherichia coli and Klebsiella spp. in a Belgian teaching hospital. J Clin Microbiol 35:2191–2197

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Essack SY (2000) Laboratory detection of extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs)—the need for a reliable, reproducible method. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 37:293–295

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Canton R, Coque TM, Baquero F (2003) Multi-resistant gram-negative bacilli: from epidemics to endemics. Curr Opin Infect Dis 16:315–325

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Paterson DL (2001) Extended-spectrum beta-lactamases: the European experience. Curr Opin Infect Dis 14:697–701

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Menashe G, Borer A, Yagupsky P, Peled N, Gilad J, Fraser D, Riesenberg K, Schlaeffer F (2001) Clinical significance and impact on mortality of extended-spectrum beta lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae isolates in nosocomial bacteremia. Scand J Infect Dis 33:188–193

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bell JA, Turnidge JD, Gales AC, Pfaller MA, Jones RN, SENTRY APAC Study Group (2002) Prevalence of extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing clinical isolates in the Asia–Pacific region and South Africa; regional results from SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program (1998–99). Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 42:193–198

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lautenbach E, Patel JB, Bilker WB, Edelstein PH, Fishman NO (2001) Extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae: risk factors and impact of resistance on outcomes. Clin Infect Dis 32:1162–1171

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Carter MW, Oakton KJ, Warner M, Livermore DM (2000) Detection of extended-spectrum β-lactamases in klebsiellae with the Oxoid combination disk method. J Clin Microbiol 38:4228–4232

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Emery CL, Weymouth L (1997) Detection and clinical significance of extended-spectrum β-lactamases in a tertiary-care medical center. J Clin Microbiol 35:2061–2067

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (2004) Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Informational supplement M100-S14. NCCLS, Wayne

    Google Scholar 

  14. Tenover FC, Mohammed J, Gorton TS, Dembek ZF (1999) Detection and reporting of organisms producing extended-spectrum β-lactamases: survey of laboratories in Connecticut. J Clin Microbiol 37:4065–4070

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (1997) Performance standards for antimicrobial disk susceptibility testing. Approved standard M2-A6. NCCLS, Wayne

    Google Scholar 

  16. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (1998) Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Informational supplement M100-S8. NCCLS, Wayne

    Google Scholar 

  17. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (1999) Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Informational supplement M100-S9. NCCLS, Wayne

    Google Scholar 

  18. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (2001) Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Informational supplement M100-S11. NCCLS, Wayne

    Google Scholar 

  19. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (2002) Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Informational supplement M100-S12. NCCLS, Wayne

    Google Scholar 

  20. Bush K (2001) New β-lactamases in gram-negative bacteria: diversity and impact on the selection of antimicrobial therapy. Clin Infect Dis 32:1085–1089

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Gniadkowski M (2001) Evolution and epidemiology of extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs) and ESBL-producing microorganisms. Clin Microbiol Infect 7:597–608

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. Yagupsky.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Katz, O.T., Peled, N. & Yagupsky, P. Evaluation of the current National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards guidelines for screening and confirming extended-spectrum beta-lactamase production in isolates of Escherichia coli and Klebsiella species from bacteremic patients. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 23, 813–817 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-004-1223-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-004-1223-4

Keywords

Navigation