Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of a disk diffusion method with cefoxitin (30 μg) for detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

  • Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The emergence of heterogeneous populations of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) causes major problems in routine screening for MRSA. In heterogeneous MRSA populations, a proportion of bacterial cells show low-level resistance to oxacillin, with minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of oxacillin ranging between 1 and 100 mg/l, while in homogeneous MRSA populations, the MIC of oxacillin for all cells is >100 mg/l. Routine oxacillin disk diffusion tests often fail to detect heterogeneous MRSA populations. In the present study, a recently proposed disk diffusion method that employs a cephamycin antibiotic (cefoxitin 30 μg; BD Sensi-disc, Becton Dickinson, Germany) was evaluated using 155 clinical isolates of S. aureus (73 mecA positive and 82 mecA negative). The results were compared with those of other MRSA screening techniques: a disk diffusion test with oxacillin 1 μg and cefoxitin 30 μg (BD Sensi-disc; Becton Dickinson), an MRSA latex agglutination test (Denka Seiken, Japan), and an oxacillin screen agar test (6 μg/ml; Becton Dickinson). Detection of the mecA gene by polymerase chain reaction was considered the gold standard. The performances of the different methods were determined and compared. The results showed that the cefoxitin disk diffusion test is preferable to the oxacillin disk diffusion method for routine screening to detect MRSA.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (1999) Four pediatric deaths from community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Minnesota and North Dakota, 1997–1999. J Am Med Assoc 282:1123–1125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Gorak EJ, Yamada SM, Brouwn JD (1999) Community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in hospitalised adults and children without known risk factors. Clin Infect Dis 29:797–800

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Herold BC, Immergluck LC, Maranan MC, Lauderdale DS, Gaskin RE, Boyle-Vavra S, Leitch CD, Daum RS (1998) Community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in children with no identified predisposing risk. J Am Med Assoc 279:593–598

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Berger B, Rohrer S (2002) Factors influencing methicillin resistance in staphylococci. Arch Microbiol 178:165–171

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Felten A, Grandry B, Lagrange PH, Casin I (2002) Evaluation of three techniques for detection of low-level methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA): a disk diffusion method with cefoxitin and moxalactam, the Vitek 2 System, and the MRSA-Screen latex agglutination test. J Clin Microbiol 40:2766–2771

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bignardi GE, Woodford N, Chapman A, Johnson AP, Speller DCE (1996) Detection of the mecA gene and phenotypic detection of resistance in Staphylococcus aureus isolates with borderline or low-level methicillin resistance. J Antimicrob Chemother 37:53–63

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. National Committee for Laboratory Standards (2003) Performance standards for antimicrobial disk susceptibility tests. Approved standard M2-A8. NCCLS, Wayne

  8. Cavassini M, Wenger A, Jaton K, Blanc DS, Bille J (1999) Evaluation of MRSA-Screen, a simple anti-PBP2a slide latex agglutination kit, for rapid detection of methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. J Clin Microbiol 37:1591–1594

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Thornsberry C, Caruthers JQ, Baker CN (1973) Effect of temperature on the in vitro susceptibility of Staphylococcus aureus to penicillinase-resistant penicillins. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 4:263–269

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Marriott DJE, Karagiannis T, Harkness JH, Kearney P (1999) Further evaluation of the MRSA-Screen kit for rapid detection of methicillin resistance. J Clin Microbiol 38:2170–2173

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. Cauwelier.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cauwelier, B., Gordts, B., Descheemaecker, P. et al. Evaluation of a disk diffusion method with cefoxitin (30 μg) for detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus . Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 23, 389–392 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-004-1130-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-004-1130-8

Keywords

Navigation