Journal of Wood Science

, Volume 64, Issue 3, pp 246–255 | Cite as

The effects of chemical components and particle size on the mechanical properties of binderless boards made from oak (Quercus spp.) logs degraded by shiitake fungi (Lentinula edodes)

  • Florence Hiu Yan Lui
  • Yoko Kurokochi
  • Hiroe Narita
  • Yukie Saito
  • Masatoshi Sato
Original Article


Binderless boards are composite boards that rely on self-bonding mechanisms for inter-fibre bonding. Quercus acutissima and Quercus serrata logs degraded by Lentinula edodes (shiitake fungi) were used in this study to investigate whether physical and chemical changes induced by shiitake fungi can enhance board mechanical properties. Binderless boards were manufactured with 0.8 g/cm3 target density, 220 °C pressing temperature, 5 MPa pressure, and pressing duration of 10 min. Boards made from logs degraded for ≥ 26 months were stronger than control boards and met modulus of rupture (MOR) and internal bonding (IB) requirements for fibreboards. Chemical composition and particle size distribution of the wood powder used to make the boards were determined to elucidate the drivers of board mechanical properties. The proportion of small particles (< 150 µm) showed a strong positive correlation with MOR for both species and hot water extractives showed a strong positive correlation with IB for Q. acutissima boards. Introduction of shiitake fungi pre-treatment to the production process may enhance the mechanical strength of binderless boards.


Binderless board Internal bonding Shiitake Degradation 



The authors express their deepest gratitude to Ms. Rie Yamashita (Industrial Research Institute of Shizuoka Prefecture) and Mr. Kiyoshi Shimura (MUSH-Shimura Farm) for their assistance in sourcing and collecting the raw materials. The authors also thank Dr. Kenji Aoki, Dr. Kei Maeda, and Mr. Akihiko Miyake for providing assistance with the mechanical tests.


  1. 1.
    Berglund L, Rowell RM (2005) Wood composites. In: Rowell RM (ed) Handbook of wood chemistry and wood composites. CRC Press LLC, Florida, pp 279–301Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kelly TJ, Smith DL, Satola J (1999) Emission rates of formaldehyde from materials and consumer products found in California homes. Environ Sci Technol 33:81–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Okuda N, Sato M (2004) Manufacture and mechanical properties of binderless boards from kenaf core. J Wood Sci 50(1):53–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hashim R, Nadhari WNAW., Sulaiman O, Kawamura F, Hiziroglu S, Sato M, Sugimoto T, Seng TG, Tanaka R (2011) Characterization of raw materials and manufactured binderless particleboard from oil palm biomass. Mater Des 32(1):246–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Saito Y, Ishii M, Sato M (2013) The suitable harvesting season and the part of moso bamboo (Phyllostachys pubescens) for producing binderless boards. Wood Sci Technol 47(5):1071–1081CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kurokochi Y, Sato M (2015) Properties of binderless board made from rice straw: the morphological effect of particles. Ind Crops Prod 69:55–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Van Dam JE, Van den Oever MJ, Teunissen W, Keijsers ER, Peralta AG (2004) Process for production of high density/high performance binderless boards from whole coconut husk: Part 1: lignin as intrinsic thermosetting binder resin. Ind Crops Prod 19(3):207–216Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lamaming J, Sulaiman O, Sugimoto T, Hashim R, Said N, Sato M (2013) Influence of chemical components of oil palm on properties of binderless particleboard. BioResources 8(3):3358–3371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Marashdeh MW, Hashim R, Tajuddin AA, Bauk S, Sulaiman O (2011) Effect of particle size on the characterization of binderless particleboard made from Rhizophora spp. mangrove wood for use as phantom material. BioResources 6(4):4028–4044Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Suzuki S, Shintani H, Park SY, Saito K, Laemsak N, Okuma M, Iiyama K (1998) Preparation of binderless boards from steam exploded pulps of oil palm (Elaeis guneensis) fronds and structural characteristics of lignin and wall polysaccharides in steam exploded pulps to be discussed for self-bindings. Holzforschung 52(4):417–426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Alvarez C, Rojano B, Almaza O, Rojas OJ, Gañán P (2011) Self-bonding boards from plantain fiber bundles after enzymatic treatment: adhesion improvement of lignocellulosic products by enzymatic pre-treatment. J Polym Environ 19(1):182–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Leatham GF (1985) Extracellular enzymes produced by the cultivated mushroom Lentinus edodes during degradation of a lignocellulosic medium. Appl Environ Microbiol 50(4):859–867PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chiang TC, Hamdan S, Osman MSB (2015) The effect of weight fraction and size on the properties of sago particles urea formaldehyde particleboard. J Teknol 73(1):61–67Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    MAFF (2010–2015) Forestry products statistics. The statistical yearbook of the ministry of agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries Japan. Accessed 27 Sept 2017; Accessed 27 Sept 2017
  15. 15.
    Kuroda K (2000) Kagaku (in Japanese). In: Japan Wood Society (ed) Mokushitsu Kagaku Jikken manual. Bunneido Shuppan, Tokyo, pp 92–97Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Yoshihara K, Kobayashi T, Fujii T, Akamatsu I (1984) A novel modification of klason lignin quantitaitve method. TAPPI J 38(4):466–447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    JIS A 5905 (2014) JIS standard specification for fiberboards. Japanese Standard Association, TokyoGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rikuta N, Yonezawa Y, Tamio K (1968) Mokuzaikagaku volume I (in Japanese). Kyoritsu Shuppan, Tokyo, p 72Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lee JW, Koo BW, Choi JW, Choi DH, Choi IG (2008) Evaluation of waste mushroom logs as a potential biomass resource for the production of bioethanol. Bioresour Technol 99(8):2736–2741CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Vane CH, Drage TC, Snape CE (2003) Biodegradation of oak (Quercus alba) wood during growth of the shiitake mushroom (Lentinula edodes): a molecular approach. J Agric Food Chem 51(4):947–956CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kishimoto J, Furukawa I, Sakuno T (1985) Comparison of konara (Quercus serrata) and kunugi (Quercus acutissima) bedlogs on the fruiting of shiitake mushroom (Lentinus edodes) (in Japanese). Koyoju Kenkyu 3:121–131Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Fahmy TY, Mobarak F (2013) Advanced binderless board-like green nanocomposites from undebarked cotton stalks and mechanism of self-bonding. Cellulose 20(3):1453–1457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ohira I (1992) Mode of wood decomposition and fruiting body development of Lentinus edodes on Quercus serrata (in Japanese). Doctoral thesis, Tottori University, JapanGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Fujiwara S, Sameshima K, Kuroda K, Takamura N (1991) Anatomy and properties of Japanese hardwoods volume I: variation of fiber dimensions and tissue proportions and their relation to basic density. IAWA J 12(4):419–424CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Japan Wood Research Society 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Florence Hiu Yan Lui
    • 1
  • Yoko Kurokochi
    • 1
  • Hiroe Narita
    • 1
  • Yukie Saito
    • 1
  • Masatoshi Sato
    • 1
  1. 1.Graduate School of Agricultural and Life SciencesThe University of TokyoTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations