Journal of Wood Science

, Volume 59, Issue 6, pp 460–468 | Cite as

Radial variation of wood cell features under different stocking densities management of two new clones of rubberwood (Hevea brasiliensis)

  • Hamid Reza Naji
  • Mohd. Hamami Sahri
  • Tadashi Nobuchi
  • Edi Suhaimi Bakar
Original article


Wood characteristics vary from pith to bark and this can influence the final use. These variations can be related to the effects of plantation management. The radial variation in fiber cells, vessel elements, and ray cells was investigated for a commercial and fast-grown species, the rubberwood (Hevea brasiliensis), at varying stocking densities. Nine-year-old trees of two new clones (RRIM 2020 and RRIM 2025) were categorized into four stocking densities of 500, 1000, 1500, and 2000 trees ha−1. The sample blocks were anatomically analyzed to determine the changes in wood cells from pith to bark. The results generally showed a centrifugal increase in fiber features, vessel diameter, ray height, and ray area. Vessel density and ray density showed a decreasing trend. Vessel areas revealed a radial irregular variation. The ray area showed a striking relationship with ray density and ray height. Ray cell pattern indicated enough variation for visual approval to ensure within and between stocking density changes. Most radial variation was explained by the effect of cambial age. Owing to different stem width and growth rates, the mean cell features were not at the same radial distances from the pith.


Radial variation Anatomical properties Stocking density Clonal effect Rubberwood 


  1. 1.
    Mohd Izham BY (2001) Quality assessment of two timbre latex clones of Rubberwood (Hevea brasiliensis). MSc Thesis, Universiti Putra MalaysiaGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ishiguri F, Wahyudi I, Takeuchi M, Takashima Y, Iizuka K, Yokota S, Yoshizawa N (2011) Wood properties of Pericopsis mooniana grown in a plantation in Indonesia. J Wood Sci 57:241–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Teoh YP, Don MM, Ujang S (2011) Assesment of properties, utilization, and preservation of rubberwood (H. brasiliensis) a case study in Malaysia. J Wood Sci 57(4):255–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Freitag J (2007) Establishing forest plantations. Accessed 28 Nov 2007
  5. 5.
    Chowdhury M, Ishiguri F, Iizuka K, Takashima Y, Matsumoto K, Hiraiwa T, Ishido M, Sanpe H, Yokota S, Yoshizawa N (2009) Radial variations of wood properties in Casuarina equisetifolia growing in Bangladesh. J Wood Sci 55:139–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Burley J, Palmer RR (1979) Pulp and wood densitometric properties of Pinus caribaea from Fiji. CFI occasional paper no. 66Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pande PK, Magan S (2005) Inter-clonal, intra-clonal, and single tree variations of wood anatomical properties and specific gravity of clonal ramets of Dalbergia sissoo Roxb. Wood Sci Technol 39:351–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dodd RS (1984) Radial and tangential diameter of wood cells within trees of Acer pseudoplatanus. IAWA Bull 5(3):253–257Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lim SC, Fujiwara T (1997) Wood density variation in two clones of rubber trees planted at three different spacings. J Trop For Prod 3(2):151–157Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Butterfield BG (2003) Wood anatomy in relation to wood quality. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, pp 30–49Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Suhaimi M, Sahri MH (2003) Variation in fiber properties of rubberwood from different clones and age groups. J Trop For Prod 9(1 & 2):162–165Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Norul Izani MA, Sahri MH (2008) Wood and cellular properties of four new Hevea species. FORTROP ΙΙ Kasetsart University, ThailandGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Weather station report (2010) Mini Station of Rubber Research institute of Malaysia. RRIMINIS, Tok dorGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nobuchi T, Ogata Y, Siripatanadilok S (1995) Seasonal characteristics of wood formation in Hopea odorata and Shorea henryana. IAWA J 16:361–369Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Honjo K, Furukawa I, Sahri MH (2005) Radial variation of fiber length increment in Acacia mangium. IAWA J 26(3):339–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Smook GA (1982) Handbook for pulp and paper technologist. Joint Executive Committees of Pulp and Paper Industry, MontrealGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Taylor F (1969) The effect of ray tissue on the specific gravity of wood. Wood Fiber Sci 1(2):142–145Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rahman MM, Fujiwara S, Kanagawa Y (2005) Variations in volume and dimensions of rays and their effect on wood properties of teak. Wood Fiber Sci 37(3):497–504Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Spurr SH, Hyvarinen MJ (1954) Wood fiber length as related to position in tree and growth. Bot Rev 20(9):561–575CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zobel BJ, Van Buijtenen JP (1989) Wood variation: its causes and control. Springer, Berlin, p 363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Fang SZ, Yang WZ (2003) Interclonal and within-tree variation in wood properties of poplar clones. J For Res 14(4):263–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    West PW (2006) Growing plantation forests. Springer, Berlin, p 304Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bowyer JL, Shmulsky R, Haygreen JG (2007) Forest products and wood science; an introduction, 5th edn. Blackwell, Iowa, p 558Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Parameswaran N, Liese W (1974) Variation of cell length in bark and wood of tropical trees. Wood Sci Technol 8:81–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Leal S, Pereira H, Grabner M, Wimmer R (2003) Clonal and site variation of vessels in 7-year-old Eucalyptus globulus. IAWA J 24(2):185–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Bao FC, Jiang ZH, Jiang XM, Lu XX, Luo XQ, Zhang SY (2001) Differences in wood properties between juvenile wood and mature wood in 10 species grown in China. Wood Sci Technol 35:363–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Aloni R (2007) Phytohormonal mechanisms that control wood quality formation in young and mature trees. In: The Compromised Wood Workshop. The Wood Technology Research Centre, Christchurch, University of Canterbury, New ZealandGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Dinwoodie JM (1981) Timber; its structure, properties and utilization. Timber press, Forest Grove, OregonGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Sekhar AC (1989) Rubberwood production and utilization. Rubber Research Institute of India, KottayamGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Syeed Saifulazry OA (2007) Evaluation of properties of 4 year-old rubberwood clones RRIM 2000 series for particle-board manufacture. MSc Thesis, Universiti Putra MalaysiaGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Aloni R, Zimmermann MH (1983) The control of vessel size and density along the plant axis. A new hypothesis. Differentiation 24:203–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Sass U, Eckstein D (1995) The variability of vessel size in beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) and its ecophysiological interpretation. Trees Struct Funct 9:247–252Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Lachenbruch B, Moore JR, Evans R (2011) Radial variation in wood structure and function in woody plants, and hypotheses for its occurrence, size- and age-related changes. In: Meinzer FC, Lachenbruch B and Dawson TE (eds) Tree structure and function. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 121–164Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Tsuchiya R, Furukawa I (2010) Relationship between the radial variation of ray characteristics and the stages of radial stem increment in Zelkova serrata. J Wood Sci 56:495–501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Lev-Yadun S, Aloni R (1995) Differentiation of the ray system in woody plants. Bot Rev 61(1):46–84Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Iqbal M, Ghousevat AKM (1987) Anatomy of the vascular cambium of Acacia nilotica (L.) Del. lelia Troup (Mimosaceae) in relation to age and season. Bot J Linn Soc 94:385–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Ohbayashi H, Shiokura T (1990) Wood anatomical characteristics and specific gravity of fast-growing tropical tree species in relation to growth rates. Mokuzai Gakkaishi 36(10):889–893Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Japan Wood Research Society 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hamid Reza Naji
    • 1
  • Mohd. Hamami Sahri
    • 1
  • Tadashi Nobuchi
    • 2
  • Edi Suhaimi Bakar
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Forest Production, Faculty of ForestryUniversiti Putra Malaysia, UPMSerdangMalaysia
  2. 2.Faculty of AgricultureKyoto UniversityKyotoJapan
  3. 3.Institute of Tropical Forestry and Forest Products (INTROP)Universiti Putra Malaysia, UPMSerdangMalaysia

Personalised recommendations