Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Sensitivity and specificity of pupillary light reflex measures for ASD using monocular pupillometry

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neurological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Automated hand-held pupillometry demonstrates precision accuracy, offering promise for augmenting ASD screening.

Methods

Monocular pupillometry was examined in children and adolescents (36 ASD; 24 TD). Multiple logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic analysis assessed PLR metrics and diagnostic status.

Results

Constriction time (Ct1) (ASD: M = 0.69, SD = 0.21; TD: M = 0.82, SD = 0.18; t(58 = 2.37; p = 0.02) and return to baseline (RTB T75) (ASD: M = 2.93, SD = 1.21; TD: M = 2.32, SD = 1.08; t(58) =  − 2.03; p = 0.04) predicted ASD (β =  − 1.31, OR = 0.27; RTB T75, β = 0.156, OR = 1.162). Sensitivity = 74.8%, when RTB ≥ 1.83 s and 69.4% when Ct1 = 0.785 s.

Conclusion

Findings suggest monocular pupillometry captures differences detecting ASD.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and material

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Code availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. American Psychiatric Association (2013) Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-5). American Psychiatric Association. Author

  2. Shattuck PT, Durkin M, Maenner M, Newschaffer C, Mandell DS, Wiggins L, ... Cuniff C (2009) Timing of identification among children with an autism spectrum disorder: findings from a population-based surveillance study. J Amer Academy Child & Adolesc Psychiatry 48(5):474-483

  3. Johnson CP, Myers SM (2007) Identification and evaluation of children with autism spectrum disorders. Pediatrics 120(5):1183–1215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. American Academy of Pediatrics (2010) Clinical report: identification and evaluation of children with autism spectrum disorders. Pediatrics 120(5):1183–1215. Reaffirmed September 2010. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2010-2549

  5. Guthrie W, Wallis K, Bennett A, Brooks E, Dudley J, Gerdes M, Pandey J, Levy S, Schultz R, Miller JS (2019) Accuracy of autism screening in a large pediatric network. Pediatrics, 144(4). https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2018-3963

  6. Centers for Disease Control (2019) Screening and diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder.: https://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/autism/screening.html

  7. Morris R, Greenblatt A, Saini M (2019) Healthcare providers’ experiences with autism: a scoping review. J Autism Dev Disorders 49(6):2374–2388. https://doi.org/10.1007/10803-019-03912-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Daluwatte, Chathuri, Miles, J.H., Christ, S.E., Beversdorf, D.Q., Takahashi, N., & Yao, G. (2013) Atypical pupillary light reflex and heart rate variability in children with autism spectrum disorder. J Autism Dev Disorders 43(8):1910–1925. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10803-012-1741-3

  9. Fan, X., Miles, J. H., Takahashi, N., & Yao, G. (2009). Abnormal transient pupillary light reflex in individuals with autism spectrum disorders. J Autism Dev Disorders 39(11):1499–1508. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%252Fs10803-009-0767-7

  10. Lynch GT, James SM, VanDam M (2018) Pupillary response and phenotype in ASD: Latency to constriction discriminates ASD from typically developing adolescents. Autism Res 11(2):364–375. https://doi.org/10.1002/aur.1888

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Nyström P, Gliga T, Jobs EN, Gredebäck G, Charman T, Johnson MH, Bölte S, Falck-Ytter T (2018) Enhanced pupillary light reflex in infancy is associated with autism diagnosis in toddlerhood. Nature Comm 9(1):1–5. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-03985-4

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Bremner F (2009) Pupil evaluation as a test for autonomic disorders. Clinical Autonomic Res 19(2):88–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Larsen RS, Waters J (2018) Neuromodulatory correlates of pupil dilation. Frontiers in Neural Circuits 12, 21. https://doi.org/10.3389/fncir.2018.00021/full

  14. Lowenstein O, Loewenfeld IE (1950) Role of sympathetic and parasympathetic systems in reflex dilation of the pupil. Arch Neurol Psychiatry 64:314–340. https://doi.org/10.1001/archneurpsyc.1950.02310270002001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Steinhauer SR, Siegle GJ, Condray R, Pless M (2004) Sympathetic and parasympathetic innervation of pupillary dilation during sustained processing. Int J Psychophysiol 52(1):77–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2003.12.005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Jones W, Klin A (2013) Attention to eyes is present but in decline in 2–6-month-old infants later diagnosed with autism. Nature 504(7480):427. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12715

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Dinalankara, D. M., Miles, J. H., Nicole Takahashi, T., & Yao, G. (2017). Atypical pupillary light reflex in 2–6‐year‐old children with autism spectrum disorders. Autism Research, 10(5):829–838. https://doi.org/10.1002/aur.1745

  18. McNett M, Moran C, Janki C, Gianakis A (2017) Correlations between hourly pupillometer readings and intracranial pressure values. J Neurosci Nursing 49(4):229–234. https://doi.org/10.1097/JNN.0000000000000290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Bradley JC, Bentley KC, Mughal AI, Bodhireddy H, Brown SM (2011) Dark-adapted pupil diameter as a function of age measured with the NeurOptics pupillometer. J Refractive Surgery 27(3):202–207. https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20100511-01

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kohnen T, Terzi E, Bühren J, Kohnen EM (2003) Comparison of a digital and a handheld infrared pupillometer for determining scotopic pupil diameter. J Cataract & Refractive Surgery 29(1):112–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Scheffel M, Kuehne C, Kohnen T (2010) Comparison of monocular and binocular infrared pupillometers under mesopic lighting conditions. J Cataract & Refractive Surgery 36(4):625–630

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kerr RG, Bacon AM, Baker LL, Gehrke JS, Hahn KD, Lillegraven CL, Hackett-Renner C, Spilman SK (2016) Underestimation of pupil size by critical care and neurosurgical nurses. Amer J Critical Care 25(3):213–219. https://doi.org/10.4037/ajcc2016554

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Marshall M, Deo R, Childs C, Ali A (2019) Feasibility and variability of automated pupillometry among stroke patients and healthy participants: potential implications for clinical practice. J Neurosci Nursing 51(2):84–88. https://doi.org/10.1097/JNN.0000000000000416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Winston M, Zhou A, Rand CM, Dunne EC, Warner JJ, Volpe LJ, Pigneri BA, Simon D, Bielawiec T, Gordon SC, Vitez SF, Charnay A, Joza S, Kelly K, Panicker C, Rizvydeen S, Niewijk G, Coleman C, Scher BJ, Reed, D.W.,…& (2019) Pupillometry measures of autonomic nervous system regulation with advancing age in a healthy pediatric cohort. Clinical Autonomic Res 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10286-019-00639-3

  25. de Vries L, Fouquaet I, Boets B, Naulaers G, Steyaert J (2020) Autism spectrum disorder and pupillometry: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.09.032

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kaufman AS, Kaufman NL (2004) Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test-Second Edition. Pearson Inc, Bloomington, MN

    Google Scholar 

  27. Le Couteur A, Lord C, Rutter M (2003) Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised. Manual. Western Psychological Services, Torrance, CA

    Google Scholar 

  28. Constantino, J. (2012). Social Responsiveness Scale, Second Edition Manual. Torrance, CA: Western Psychological Services.

  29. NeurOptics, Inc. PLR-3000 research device. Irvine, CA.

  30. MedCalc (2021) MedCalc Statistical Software, version 20.010; Ostend, Belgium: MedCalc Software.

  31. Mathworks, Inc (2019) MATLAB and statistics toolbox, version 9.6.01174912, release 2019a. Natick, MA: The Mathworks Inc.

  32. StataCorp (2019) Stata Statistical Software: Release 16. College Station, TX: StataCorp LLC

  33. DeLong, E. R., DeLong, D. M., & Clarke-Pearson, D. L. (1988). Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics, 837–845.

  34. Efron B (1987) Better bootstrap confidence intervals. J Am Stat Assoc 82(397):171–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Lasko TA, Bhagwat JG, Zou KH, Ohno-Machado L (2005) The use of receiver operating characteristic curves in biomedical informatics. J Biomed Inform 38(5):404–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Nyström P, Gredebäck G, Bölte S, Falck-Ytter T (2015) Hypersensitive pupillary light reflex in infants at risk for autism. Molecular Autism 6(1):10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Kercher C, Azinfar L, Dinalankara DM, Takahashi TN, Miles JH, Yao G (2020) A longitudinal study of pupillary light reflex in 6-to 24-month children. Sci Rep 10(1):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-58254-6

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Fish LA, Nyström P, Gliga T, Gui A, Begum Ali J, Mason L, ... BASIS/STAARS* team (2021) Development of the pupillary light reflex from 9 to 24 months: association with common autism spectrum disorder (ASD) genetic liability and 3‐year ASD diagnosis. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 62(11), 1308-1319

Download references

Acknowledgements

We wish to express our sincere gratitude to study participants and their families.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Speech and Hearing Sciences, Elson S. Floyd College of Medicine Washington State University, Spokane, WA, USA

    Georgina T. F. Lynch

  2. Sleep and Performance Research Center, College of Nursing, Washington State University, Spokane, WA, USA

    Stephen M. James

  3. Department of Speech Language Pathology, Dallas, TX, USA

    Teresa A. Cardon

  4. Department of Community and Behavioral Health, Elson S. Floyd College of Medicine Washington State University, Spokane, WA, USA

    Sterling M. McPherson

Authors
  1. Georgina T. F. Lynch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Stephen M. James
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Teresa A. Cardon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Sterling M. McPherson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation and data collection were performed by GL, TC, and SJ. Data analysis and manuscript preparation were done by GL and SM. The first draft of the manuscript was written by GL and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Georgina T. F. Lynch.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All procedures in this study involving human participants were in accordance with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Study procedures were reviewed and approved by the Washington State University Institutional Review Board, under IRB protocol #15613–002. Informed consent to participate in this study was obtained from all study participants and their legal guardians.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 24 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lynch, G.T.F., James, S.M., Cardon, T.A. et al. Sensitivity and specificity of pupillary light reflex measures for ASD using monocular pupillometry. Neurol Sci 43, 4537–4545 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-022-05976-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-022-05976-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation