Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Evaluation of clinical findings and neurofibromatosis type 1 bright objects on brain magnetic resonance images of 60 Turkish patients with NF1 gene variants

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neurological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is caused by mutations in the NF1 gene. This retrospective study aims to evaluate the clinical manifestations and brain magnetic resonance images (MRI) analysis in 60 genetically confirmed NF1 patients. The results of next-generation sequencing (NGS), Sanger sequencing, and MLPA of NF1 gene were evaluated. A total of 54 different variants were identified. Fourteen out of them were novel variants (25.9%). Patients who complied with NIH criteria had most frequently frameshift variants (11/32 patients), and those with only CALMs had missense variants (9/28 patients). Neurofibromatosis type 1 bright objects (NBOs) on T2-weighted MRI were detected in 42 patients (42/56; 75%). These brain lesions were detected mostly in basal ganglia and in cerebellar vermis. NBOs were detected more in the patients who complied with NIH criteria (80.6%) compared to those who were only CALMs (68%). While frameshift variants (33.3%) were the most common type variants in the patients who had NBOs, the most common variants were splicing (35.7%) and missense (35.7%) variants in the patients whose MRIs were normal. Frameshift variants (11/28 patients; 39.3%) were the most common in the patients with more than one brain locus involvement. Therefore, we consider that frameshift variants may be associated with increased incidence of NBOs and involvement of more than one brain locus. In addition, NBOs may occur less frequently in the patients with splicing variants. To our knowledge, this is the first study evaluated the relationship between NF1 gene variants and NBOs. Future studies may help us understand the etiology of NBOs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hirbe AC, Gutmann DH (2014) Neurofibromatosis type 1: a multidisciplinary approach to care. Lancet Neurol 13:834–843

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference Statement on Acoustic Neuroma (1991) The consensus development panel (1994). Arch Neurol 51:201–207

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ferrari F, Masurel A, Olivier-Faivre L, Vabres P (2014) Juvenile xanthogranuloma and nevus anemicus in the diagnosis of neurofibromatosis type 1. JAMA Dermatol 150:42–46

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Tekin M, Bodurtha JN, Riccardi VM (2001) Cafe au lait spots: the pediatrician’s perspective. Pediatr Rev 22:82–90

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Nunley KS, Gao F, Albers AC et al (2009) Predictive value of café au lait macules at initial consultation in the diagnosis of neurofibromatosis type 1. Arch Dermatol 145:883–887

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bayat M, Bayat A (2020) Neurological manifestations of neurofibromatosis: a review. Neurol Sci 41:2685–2690

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Baudou E, Nemmi F, Biotteau M, Maziero S, Peran P, Chaix Y (2020) Can the cognitive phenotype in neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) be explained by neuroimaging? A review. Front Neurol 10:1373

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Lopes Ferraz Filho JR, Munis MP, Soares Souza A et al (2008) Unidentified bright objects on brain MRI in children as a diagnostic criterion for neurofibromatosis type 1. Pediatr Radiol 38:305–310

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Wallace MR, Marchuk DA, Andersen LB et al (1990) Type 1 neurofibromatosis gene: identification of a large transcript disrupted in three NF1 patients. Science 249:181–186

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Cawthon RM, Weiss R, Xu GF et al (1990) A majör segment of the neurofibromatosis type 1 gene: cDNA sequence, genomic structure, and point mutations. Cell 62:193–201

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Martin GA, Viskochil D, Bollag G et al (1990) The GAP-related domain of the neurofibromatosis type 1 gene product interacts with ras p21. Cell 63:843–849

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Xu GF, O'Connell P, Viskochil D et al (1990) The neurofibromatosis type 1 gene encodes a protein related to GAP. Cell 62:599–608

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bollag G, McCormick F (1991) Differential regulation of ras GAP and neurofibromatosis gene product activities. Nature 351:576–579

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Marchuk DA, Saulino AM, Tavakkol R et al (1991) cDNA cloning of the type 1 neurofibromatosis gene: complete sequence of the NF1 gene product. Genomics 11:931–940

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Yu H, Zhao X, Su B, Li D, Xu Y, Luo S, Xiao C, Wang W (2005) Expression of NF1 pseudogenes. Hum Mutat 26:487–488

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Castle B, Baser ME, Huson SM, Cooper DN, Upadhyaya M (2003) Evaluation of genotype-phenotype correlations in neurofibromatosis type 1. J Med Genet 40:e109

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Ulusal SD, Gürkan H, Atlı E et al (2017) Genetic analyses of the NF1 gene in Turkish neurofibromatosis type I patients and definition of three novel variants. Balkan J Med Genet 20:13–20

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Pasmant E, de Saint-Trivier A, Laurendeau I, Dieux-Coeslier A, Parfait B, Vidaud M, Vidaud D, Bièche I (2008) Characterization of a 7.6-Mb germline deletion encompassing the NF1 locus and about a hundred genes in an NF1 contiguous gene syndrome patient. Eur J Hum Genet 16:1459–1466

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Zhu L, Zhang Y, Tong H, Shao M, Gu Y, du X, Wang P, Shi L, Zhang L, Bi M, Wang X, Zhang G (2016) Clinical and molecular characterization of NF1 patients: single-center experience of 32 patients from China. Medicine (Baltimore) 95:e3043

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Richards S, Aziz N, Bale S, ACMG Laboratory Quality Assurance Committee et al (2015) ACMG laboratory quality assurance committee. Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Genet Med 17:405–424

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Adzhubei I, Jordan DM, Sunyaev SR (2013) Predicting functional effect of human missense mutations using PolyPhen-2. Curr Protoc Hum Genet 76(Chapter 7):Unit7.20

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kumar P, Henikoff S, Ng PC (2009) Predicting the effects of coding non-synonymous variants on protein function using the SIFT algorithm. Nat Protoc 4:1073–1081

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Schwarz JM, Cooper DN, Schuelke M et al (2014) MutationTaster2: mutation prediction for the deep-sequencing age. Nat Methods 11:361–362

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Upadhyaya M (2010) Neurofibromatosis type 1: diagnosis and recent advances. Expert Opin Med Diagn 4:307–322

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Jett K, Friedman JM (2010) Clinical and genetic aspects of neurofibromatosis 1. Genet Med 12:1–11

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Bianchessi D, Morosini S, Saletti V, Ibba MC, Natacci F, Esposito S, Cesaretti C, Riva D, Finocchiaro G, Eoli M (2015) 126 novel mutations in Italian patients with neurofibromatosis type 1. Mol Genet Genomic Med 3:513–525

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Palma Milla C, Lezana Rosales JM, López Montiel J et al (2018) Neurofibromatosis type I: mutation spectrum of NF1 in spanish patients. Ann Hum Genet 82:425–436

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Barrea C, Vaessen S, Bulk S et al (2018) Phenotype-genotype correlation in children with neurofibromatosis type 1. Neuropediatrics 49:180–184

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Alwan S, Tredwell SJ, Friedman JM (2005) Is osseous dysplasia a primary feature of neurofibromatosis 1 (NF1)? Clin Genet 67:378–390

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Van Minkelen R, van Bever Y, Kromosoeto JN et al (2014) A clinical and genetic overview of 18 years neurofibromatosis type 1 molecular diagnostics in the Netherlands. Clin Genet 85:318–327

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Tsipi M, Poulou M, Fylaktou I, Kosma K, Tsoutsou E, Pons MR, Kokkinou E, Kitsiou-Tzeli S, Fryssira H, Tzetis M (2018) Phenotypic expression of a spectrum of neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) mutations identified through NGS and MLPA. J Neurol Sci 395:95–105

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Giugliano T, Santoro C, Torella A et al (2019) Clinical and genetic findings in children with neurofibromatosis type 1, Legius syndrome, and other related neurocutaneous disorders. Genes (Basel) 10:580

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Messiaen LM, Callens T, Mortier G et al (2000) Exhaustive mutation analysis of the NF1 gene allows identification of 95% of mutations and reveals a high frequency of unusual splicing defects. Hum Mutat 15:541–555

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Zatkova A, Messiaen L, Vandenbroucke I, Wieser R, Fonatsch C, Krainer AR, Wimmer K (2004) Disruption of exonic splicing enhancer elements is the principal cause of exon skipping associated with seven nonsense or missense alleles of NF1. Hum.Mutat 24:491–501

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Mattocks C, Baralle D, Tarpey P, ffrench-Constant C, Bobrow M, Whittaker J (2004) Automated comparative sequence analysis identifies mutations in 89% of NF1 patients and confirms a mutation cluster in exons 11–17 distinct from the GAP related domain. J Med Genet 41:e48

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Zhang J, Tong H, Fu X et al (2015) Molecular characterization of NF1 and neurofibromatosis type 1 genotype-phenotype correlations in a Chinese population. Sci Rep 5:11291

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Ars E, Kruyer H, Morell M, Pros E, Serra E, Ravella A, Estivill X, Lázaro C (2003) Recurrent mutations in the NF1 gene are common among neurofibromatosis type 1 patients. J Med Genet 40:e82

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Pasmant E, Vidaud M, Vidaud D, Wolkenstein P (2012) Neurofibromatosis type 1: from genotype to phenotype. J Med Genet 49:483–489

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. De Raedt T, Brems H, Wolkenstein P et al (2003) Elevated risk for MPNST in NF1 microdeletion patients. Am J Hum Genet 72:288–1292

    Google Scholar 

  40. Kluwe L, Siebert R, Gesk S, Friedrich RE, Tinschert S, Kehrer-Sawatzki H, Mautner VF (2004) Screening 500 unselected neurofibromatosis 1 patients for deletions of the NF1 gene. Hum Mutat 23:111–116

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Pasmant E, Sabbagh A, Spurlock G, Laurendeau I, Grillo E, Hamel MJ, Martin L, Barbarot S, Leheup B, Rodriguez D, Lacombe D, Dollfus H, Pasquier L, Isidor B, Ferkal S, Soulier J, Sanson M, Dieux-Coeslier A, Bièche I, Parfait B, Vidaud M, Wolkenstein P, Upadhyaya M, Vidaud D, members of the NF France Network (2010) NF1 microdeletions in neurofibromatosis type 1: from genotype to phenotype. Hum Mutat 31:E1506–E1518

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Ning X, Farschtschi S, Jones A, Kehrer-Sawatzki H, Mautner VF, Friedman JM (2016) Growth in neurofibromatosis 1 microdeletion patients. Clin Genet 89:351–354

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Kehrer-Sawatzki H, Mautner VF, Cooper DN (2017) Emerging genotype-phenotype relationships in patients with large NF1 deletions. Hum Genet 136:349–376

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Friedman JM. Neurofibromatosis 1. In: Adam MP, Ardinger HH, Pagon RA et al (eds) GeneReviews. University of Washington, pp 1993–2020

  45. Prada CE, Hufnagel RB, Hummel TR et al (2015) The use of magnetic resonance imaging screening for optic pathway gliomas in children with neurofibromatosis type 1. J Pediatr 167:851–856

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Sellmer L, Farschtschi S, Marangoni M, Heran MKS, Birch P, Wenzel R, Mautner VF, Friedman JM (2018) Serial MRIs provide novel insight into natural history of optic pathway gliomas in patients with neurofibromatosis 1. Orphanet J Rare Dis 13:62

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Blanchard G, Lafforgue MP, Lion-François L et al (2016) Systematic MRI in NF1 children under six years of age for the diagnosis of optic pathway gliomas. Study and outcome of a French cohort. Eur J Paediatr Neurol 20:275–281

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. DeBella K, Poskitt K, Szudek J, Friedman JM (2000) Use of “unidentified bright objects” on MRI for diagnosis of neurofibromatosis 1 in children. Neurology 54:1646–1650

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Mentzel HJ, Seidel J, Fitzek C et al (2005) Pediatric brain MRI in neurofibromatosis type I. Eur Radiol 15:814–822

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sultan Aydin Köker.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

None

Financial Disclosure

The authors have no financial relationships relevant to this article to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hazan, F., Gürsoy, S., Unalp, A. et al. Evaluation of clinical findings and neurofibromatosis type 1 bright objects on brain magnetic resonance images of 60 Turkish patients with NF1 gene variants. Neurol Sci 42, 2045–2057 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-020-04988-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-020-04988-0

Keywords

Navigation