Skip to main content
Log in

Ultrasound reference values of C5, C6, and C7 brachial plexus roots at the interscalene groove

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neurological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

The objective of this study is to estimate the reference values of the brachial plexus roots at the interscalene groove. The physical and demographic characteristics of 59 healthy adult volunteers were studied. The CSA reference values and their correlations with weight, height, age, body mass index (BMI).

Methods

Fifty nine (27 males, 32 females) subjects were enrolled in the study. The mean cross sectional area of C5, C6 and C7 nerve roots were obtained.

Results

The mean CSA of the brachial plexus roots was as follows: C5 nerve root was 5.1 mm2 (range 1.7–11.1 ± 1.9 SD), C6 nerve root CSA 5.8 mm2 (range 1.7–12 ± 2.4 SD), and C7 nerve root 6.3 (range 1.6–19.6 ± 3.4 SD). There was a significant statistical difference between both sexes in our study. No statistical significant difference in tissue stiffness between dominant and nondominant hands. No statistical correlation was found between the CSA of the cervical nerve roots and different demographic factors. There was a positive statistical correlation between the CSA of C5 and both C6 and C7 nerve roots. Also positive significant statistical correlation was noted between the CSA of C6 and C7 nerve roots.

Conclusion

The CSA reference values of the C5-C7 nerve roots has been determined in asymptomatic individuals and can serve as a reference when studying pathological conditions of these structures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

CSA:

Cross-sectional area

BMI:

Body mass index

References

  1. Haun DW, Cho JC, Clark TB, Kettner NW (2009 Sep) Normative cross-sectional area of the brachial plexus and subclavian artery using ultrasonography. J Manip Physiol Ther 32(7):564–570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Haun DW, Cho JC, Kettner NW (2010) Normative cross-sectional area of the C5-C8 nerve roots using ultrasonography. Ultrasound Med Biol 36(9):1422–1430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Orebaugh SL, Williams BA (2009) Brachial plexus anatomy: normal and variant. ScientificWorldJournal. 9:300–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Johnson EO, Vekris M, Demesticha T, Soucacos PN (2010) Neuroanatomy of the brachial plexus: normal and variant anatomy of its formation. Surg Radiol Anat 32(3):291–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lapegue F, Faruch-Bilfeld M, Demondion X, Apredoaei C, Bayol MA, Artico H, Chiavassa-Gandois H, Railhac JJ, Sans N (2014) Ultrasonography of the brachial plexus, normal appearance and practical applications. Diagn Interv Imaging 95(3):259–275

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Mattox R, Battaglia PJ, Welk AB, Maeda Y, Haun DW, Kettner NW (2016) Reference values for the scalene interval width during varying degrees of glenohumeral abduction using ultrasonography. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 39(9):662–667

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bedewi MA, Nissman D, Aldossary NM, Maetani TH, El Sharkawy MS, Koura H (2018 Sep) Shear wave elastography of the brachial plexus roots at the interscalene groove. Neurol Res 40(9):805–810

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Griffith JF (2018) Ultrasound of the brachial plexus. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 22(3):323–333. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1645862Epub 2018 May 23. Review

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Griffith JF, Lalam RK (2019) Top-ten tips for imaging the brachial plexus with ultrasound and MRI. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 23(4):405–418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Won SJ, Kim BJ, Park KS, Kim SH, Yoon JS (2012 Nov) Measurement of cross-sectional area of cervical roots and brachial plexus trunks. Muscle Nerve 46(5):711–716

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Sugimoto T, Ochi K, Hosomi N, Mukai T, Ueno H, Takahashi T, Ohtsuki T, Kohriyama T, Matsumoto M (2013) Ultrasonographic reference sizes of the median and ulnar nerves and the cervical nerve roots in healthy Japanese adults. Ultrasound Med Biol 39(9):1560–1570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kerasnoudis A, Pitarokoili K, Behrendt V, Gold R, Yoon MS (2013) Cross sectional area reference values for sonography of peripheral nerves and brachial plexus. Clin Neurophysiol 124(9):1881

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Cartwright MS, Passmore LV, Yoon JS, Brown ME, Caress JB, Walker FO (2008) Cross-sectional area reference values for nerve ultrasonography. Muscle Nerve 37:566–571

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the Deanship of Scientific Research at Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohamed A. Bedewi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

Ethical approval was obtained by local ethics commettee.

Informed consent

Proper informed consent was obtained from each patient.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bedewi, M.A., Kotb, M.A. Ultrasound reference values of C5, C6, and C7 brachial plexus roots at the interscalene groove. Neurol Sci 42, 2425–2429 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-020-04836-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-020-04836-1

Keywords

Navigation