Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Serum vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) levels in ischemic stroke patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of case–control studies

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neurological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Serum VEGF level is regarded to be a biomarker for the diagnosis of stroke. Even though there have been published plethora of original articles describing higher blood VEGF concentrations since the 1970s, however, there is no any meta-analysis report for serum VEGF levels in the field of evidence-based medicine yet. A systematic review was performed by searching the online biomedical databases including retrieving 14 case–control studies including within-article subgroups after fulfilling the inclusion and exclusion criteria without the beginning date restriction, until 2020 for ischemic stroke patients. The Q quantity and I2% statistic index showed a high heterogeneity (84.895 and 84.687, respectively) and the random-effects model of meta-analysis was applied for further analyses. The meta-analysis on a total number of 769 stroke subjects and 621 controls found that the weighted pooled SMD for overall serum VEGF levels on different days of testing was 1.92 (95% CI, − 4.059–0.219, p value = 0.079) and the pooled SMD for overall serum VEGF levels on day 1 of testing was − 1.083 (95% CI, − 4.229–2.063, p value = 0.500). The meta-regression results demonstrated that different days of testing do not significantly affect serum VEGF concentrations in ischemic patients and actually their serum levels are time-independent. Based on the recently published studies, this meta-analysis showed that serum VEGF levels were not significantly associated with an ischemic stroke diagnosis. Thus, researchers may concern another ideal serum or cerebrospinal fluid-derived biomarker for stroke diagnosis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. González RG, Hirsch JA, Koroshetz W, Lev MH, Schaefer PW (2011) Acute ischemic stroke. Springer

  2. Mendelow A D, Lo E H, Sacco R L, Faan MMF, Wong LK (2015) Stroke: pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management, Elsevier Inc

  3. Kini S, Memon F, Asgaonkar D (2019) Outcome in survivors of middle cerebral artery territory ischemic stroke: can it be predicted? J Assoc Phys India 6746

  4. Hadi A, Bendriss L, Khatouri A (2018) The contribution of systematic implementation of cardiovascular explorations for the detection of cardiac sources of embolism in patients with stroke: about 230 patients. Ann Cardiol Angeiol 67(4):256–259

  5. Farooqui AA (2013) Beneficial effects of propolis on neurological disorders. Springer, pp. 301-322

  6. Aho K, Harmsen P, Hatano S, Marquardsen J, Smirnov VE, Strasser T (1980) Cerebrovascular disease in the community: results of a WHO collaborative study. Bull World Health Organ 58(1):113

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Torres-Aleman I (2000) Serum growth factors and neuroprotective surveillance: focus on IGF-1. Mol Neurobiol 21(3):153–160

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Jin KL, Mao XO, Greenberg DA (2000) Vascular endothelial growth factor: direct neuroprotective effect in in vitro ischemia. Proc Natl Acad Sci 97(18):10242–10247

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Greenberg DA, Jin K (2013) Vascular endothelial growth factors (VEGFs) and stroke. Cell Mol Life Sci 70(10):1753–1761

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, The P G (2009) Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 6(7):e1000097

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Higgins JPT, Thompson SG (2002) Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med 21(11):1539–1558

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Faraone SV (2008) Interpreting estimates of treatment effects: implications for managed care. P T 33(12):700–711

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Matsuo R, Ago T, Kamouchi M, Kuroda J, Kuwashiro T, Hata J, Sugimori H, Fukuda K, Gotoh S, Makihara N (2013) Clinical significance of plasma VEGF value in ischemic stroke-research for biomarkers in ischemic stroke (REBIOS) study. BMC Neurol 13(1):32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Giordano M, Ciarambino T, D’Amico M, Trotta MC, Sette D, Marinella A, Marfella R, Malatino L, Paolisso G, Adinolfi LE (2019) Circulating MiRNA-195-5p and-451a in transient and acute ischemic stroke patients in an emergency department. J Clin Med 8(2):130

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Setyopranoto I, Sadewa AH, Wibowo S, Widyadharma IPE (2019) Comparison of mean VEGF-A expression between acute ischemic stroke patients and non-ischemic stroke subjects. Open Access Maced J Med Sci 7(5):747

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Xue L, Chen H, Zhang T, Chen J, Geng Z, Zhao Y (2017) Changes in serum vascular endothelial growth factor and endostatin concentrations associated with circulating endothelial progenitor cells after acute ischemic stroke. Metab Brain Dis 32(2):641–648

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Slevin M, Krupinski J, Slowik A, Kumar P, Szczudlik A, Gaffney J (2000) Serial measurement of vascular endothelial growth factor and transforming growth factor-β1 in serum of patients with acute ischemic stroke. Stroke 31(8):1863–1870

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Mykhalojko O, Mykhalojko I (2017) Some biochemical changes in patients with acute ischemic stroke. Ukr Biochem J 89(3):31–35

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Gavaghan DJ, Moore RA, McQuay HJ (2000) An evaluation of homogeneity tests in meta-analyses in pain using simulations of individual patient data. Pain 85(3):415–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Higgins JPT, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG (2003) Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 327(7414):557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Geiseler SJ, Morland C (2018) The janus face of VEGF in stroke. Int J Mol Sci 19(5):1362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kaya D, Gürsoy-Özdemir Y, Yemisci M, Tuncer N, Aktan S, Dalkara T (2005) VEGF protects brain against focal ischemia without increasing blood–brain permeability when administered intracerebroventricularly. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 25(9):1111–1118

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We appreciate Ilam University of Medical Sciences.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ali Noori-Zadeh.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

The present study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Ilam University of Medical Sciences (IR.MEDILAM.REC.1398.187).

Additional information

Article highlights

• The association between serum VEGF concentrations and ischemic stroke detection was investigated using meta-analysis.

• The included studies (systematic review) were heterogeneous and the random-effects model was applied.

• The pooled SMD for overall serum VEGF levels on different days of testing was 1.92 (95% CI, − 4.059–0.219, p value = 0.079).

• The pooled SMD for overall serum VEGF levels on day 1 of testing was − 1.083 (95% CI, − 4.229–2.063, p value = 0.500).

• Based on the included studies, serum VEGF levels were not significantly associated with an ischemic stroke diagnosis.

• Researchers may concern another ideal serum or cerebrospinal fluid-derived biomarker for the near future.

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Seidkhani-Nahal, A., Khosravi, A., Mirzaei, A. et al. Serum vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) levels in ischemic stroke patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of case–control studies. Neurol Sci 42, 1811–1820 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-020-04698-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-020-04698-7

Keywords

Navigation