Skip to main content
Log in

Informing MS patients on treatment options: a consensus on the process of consent taking

  • Brief Communication
  • Published:
Neurological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the last years, change in multiple sclerosis (MS) therapeutic scenario has highlighted the need for an improved doctor-patient communication in advance of treatment initiation in order to allow patient’s empowerment in the decision-making process.

Aims

The aims of our project were to review the strategies used by Italian MS specialists to inform patients about treatment options and to design a multicentre shared document that homogenizes the information about disease-modifying treatment (DMTs) and the procedure of taking informed consent in clinical practice.

Results

The new resource, obtained by consensus among 31 neurologists from 27 MS Centres in Italy with the supervision of a medico-legal advisor, received the aegis of Italian Neurological Society (SIN) and constitutes a step toward a standardized decision process around DMTs in MS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Lorefice L, Mura G, Coni G et al (2013) What do multiple sclerosis patients and their caregivers perceive as unmet needs? BMC Neurol 13:177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Heesen C, Kasper J, Köpke S, Richter T, Segal J, Muhlhauser I (2007) Informed shared decision making in multiple sclerosis—inevitable or impossible? J Neurol Sci 259(1–2):109–117

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Forbes A, While A, Taylor M (2007) What people with multiple sclerosis perceive to be important to meeting their needs. J Adv Nurs 58(1):11–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Colligan E, Metzler A, Tiryaki E (2017) Shared decision-making in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 23(2):185–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Köpke S, Solari A, Rhan A, Khan F, Heensen C, Giordano A (2014) Information provision for people with multiple sclerosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4:CD008757

    Google Scholar 

  6. Heesen C, Solari A, Giordano A, et al. Decisions on multiple sclerosis immunotherapy: new treatment complexities urge patient engagement. J Neurol Sci 2011; 306(1–2): 192–197

  7. Hall DE, Prochavaza AV, Fink AS. Informed consent for clinical treatment. CMAJ 2012; 20;184(5):533–40

  8. Spatz E, Krumholz HM, Moulton BW. The new era of informed consent getting to a reasonable-patient standard through shared decision making. JAMA 2016; 17;315(19):2063–4

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. Tortorella.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interests

CT has received honoraria for advisory board and speaking honoraria from Biogen, Merck, Teva, Serono, Roche, Novaritis and Sanofi-Genzyme. CS received advisory board membership of the following companies: Biogen and Merck Serono; speaking honoraria from Bayer Schering, Biogen, Merck Serono, Almirall, Teva, Genzyme; research grants and support from the Italian MS Society Research Foundation (Fondazione Italiana Sclerosi Multipla). PA honoraria for lecturing and participation in advisory boards and travel expenses for attending congresses and meetings from Merck Serono, Biogen, Teva, Sanofi-Aventis, Almirall, Roche and Novartis. LB has nothing to disclose. MCB received speaking honoraria and/or consultant fees from Biogen, Merck Serono, Sanofi-Genzyme, Teva, Novartis and Roche. FB has served on advisory boards for Teva and Roche and has received travel grants and/or speaker honoraria from Merck Serono, Teva, Biogen, Sanofi-Genzyme and Novartis. MC participated on advisory boards for and received speaker or writing honoraria and funding for travelling from Bayer, Biogen Idec, Genzyme, Merck, Novartis, Roche and Teva. PC has served on scientific advisory boards for Merck Serono, Sanofi-Genzyme and Roche; has received speaker honoraria from Genzyme, Teva, Biogen, Novartis and Merck Serono; has received travel funding from Almirall, Biogen, Sanofi-Genzyme, Novartis, Merck Serono and Teva; and has been a consultant for Teva, Sanofi-Genzyme and Merck Serono. EC served on scientific advisory boards and received honoraria for speaking from Almirall, Bayer, Biogen, Merck Serono, Novartis, Sanofi-Genzyme and Teva. CC has nothing to disclose. MDF participated on advisory boards for and received speaker or writing honoraria and funding for travelling from Bayer, Biogen Idec, Genzyme, Merck, Novartis, Roche and Teva. RF has served on advisory boards for Roche, Biogen, Novartis, Merck Serono and has received travel grants and/or speaker honoraria from Teva and Sanofi-Genzyme. DF has served on scientific advisory boards for Biogen, Roche and Merck Serono and has received travel grants and/or speaking honoraria from TEVA, Merck, Biogen, Novartis and Sanofi-Genzyme. AG received research funding and advisory board compensation from Merck Serono. AG has nothing to disclose. RL received personal fees and financial support from Almirall, Novartis, Merck Serono, Biogen, Teva and Genzyme. LP received consulting fees from Biogen, Novartis and Roche; speaker honoraria from Biogen, Genzyme, Merck Serono, Novartis and Teva; travel grants from Biogen, Genzyme, Novartis and Teva; and research grants from the Italian MS Society (Associazione Italiana Sclerosi Multipla) and Genzyme. AL received lecturing honoraria from Biogen and Teva; consulting fees from Sanofi-Genzyme, Biogen, Merck and Roche; and funding for travel from Sanofi-Genzyme, Biogen, Merck and Teva. SLF received funding for travel and for advisory board from Genzyme, Biogen Idec, Teva, Merck and Serono. SM has nothing to disclose. GTM received personal compensation from Serono, Biogen and TEVA for public speaking and advisory boards. MM has received research grants from ECTRIMS-MAGNIMS and Merck and honoraria from Biogen, Merck and Sanofi-Genzyme. VN has served on scientific advisory boards for Novartis, Teva, Biogen Idec, Sanofi, Genzyme and Bayer Schering and has received funding for travel and speaker honoraria from Teva, Biogen Idec, Bayer Schering, Merck Serono, Almirall, Genzyme and Novartis. DP received honoraria for consultancy and/or speaking from Biogen Idec, Merck Serono, Bayer Schering, Sanofi-Aventis, Teva, Novartis and Genzyme. IP has nothing to disclose. LP received consulting fees from Biogen, Novartis and Roche; speaker honoraria from Biogen, Genzyme, Merck Serono, Novartis and Teva; travel grants from Biogen, Genzyme, Novartis and Teva; research grants from the Italian MS Society (Associazione Italiana Sclerosi Multipla) and Genzyme. PR received travel expenses or honoraria for consultancy from Merck Serono, Biogen Idec, Novartis, Sanofi-Genzyme and Teva. VT has received research support and honoraria from Biogen Idec and honoraria and travel grants from Biogen Idec and Novartis. VTC received personal compensation from Novartis, Almirall, Genzyme and Teva for public speaking, editorial work and advisory boards. MR has nothing to disclose. MG has nothing to disclose. CG has received compensation for consulting from Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals and Biogen Idec and as a speaker for lectures from Biogen Idec, Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Genzyme, Merck Serono, Novartis and Teva Pharmaceutical Industries. RIREMS meetings during the planning and the conduction of the project were supported by an unrestricted contribution by Merck Serono. The sponsor only contributed to the logistics of the meetings but had no role in the planning, the study design or the conduction of the project.

Ethical approval

None

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tortorella, C., Solaro, C., Annovazzi, P. et al. Informing MS patients on treatment options: a consensus on the process of consent taking. Neurol Sci 41, 2249–2253 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-020-04339-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-020-04339-z

Keywords

Navigation