Abstract
Background
Diclofenac potassium for oral solution (CAMBIA®) may be an alternative for patients who would otherwise need to be seen in a healthcare setting for parenteral ketorolac. CAMBIA® is FDA-approved for the abortive treatment of migraine and has demonstrated superiority over generic diclofenac tablets with rapid migraine reduction. This study assessed for efficacy of CAMBIA® as an alternative outpatient treatment for refractory migraine to parenteral ketorolac.
Methods
We performed an exploratory, single-center, double-blind, double-dummy randomized controlled trial comparing CAMBIA® with IM ketorolac. Participants were randomized to receive either ketorolac 60 mg IM with dummy oral solution or CAMBIA® 50 mg, together with IM injection of normal saline. The primary endpoint was headache severity, self-rated on a scale 0–3. Secondary endpoints included self-rated nausea, disability, and photo- or phonophobia, as well as presence of side effects and need for additional rescue therapy.
Results
A total of 23 patients were enrolled. Ten patients received the study drug and 13 patients received IM ketorolac as the control. There were no major differences observed with respect to the primary outcome of mean headache severity at successive time points over a 24-h follow-up period. No major differences were found with respect to average disability, nausea, and photo- or phonophobia ratings. No major adverse events were reported.
Conclusion
In treatment of refractory migraine headache, CAMBIA® may provide similar benefits as IM ketorolac without increasing the risk of treatment failure, major bleeding, or cardiovascular events. However, larger studies are needed to confirm this finding.
Trial registration
Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT # 02664116, Titled “IM Ketorolac vs Diclofenac Potassium Powder for Oral Solution (CAMBIA®) for the Acute Treatment of Severe Migraine”. Registered 26 January 2016, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02664116?term=02664116&rank=1
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
We confirm that the datasets during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Abbreviations
- ED:
-
emergency department
- IM:
-
intramuscular
- IV:
-
intravenous
- NSAID:
-
non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug
References
GBD 2015 (2016) Disease and Injury Incidence and Prevalence Collaborators. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 310 diseases and injuries, 1990–2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. Lancet 388:1545–1602
Burch RC, Loder S, Loder E, Smitherman TA (2015) The prevalence and burden of migraine and severe headache in the United States: updated statistics from government health surveillance studies. Headache. 55:21–34
Lipton RB, Bigal ME, Diamond M, Freitag F, Reed ML, Stewart WF (2007) Migraine prevalence, disease burden, and the need for preventive therapy. Neurology. 68:343–349
Buse DC, Rupnow MFT, Lipton RB (2009) Assessing and managing all aspects of migraine: migraine attacks, migraine-related functional impairment, common comorbidities, and quality of life. Mayo Clin Proc 84(5):422–435
GBD 2016 (2017) Disease and Injury Incidence and Prevalence Collaborators. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 328 diseases and injuries for 195 countries, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet 390(10100):1211–1259
Orr SL, Friedman BW, Christie S, Minen MT, Bamford C, Kelley NE, Tepper D (2016) Management of adults with acute migraine in the emergency department: the American Headache Society evidence assessment of parenteral pharmacotherapies. Headache. 56:911–940
Stokes M, Becker WJ, Lipton RB et al (2011) Cost of health care among patients with chronic and episodic migraine in Canada and the USA: results from the International Burden of Migraine Study (IBMS). Headache 51(7):1058–1077
Friedman BW, Garber L, Yoon A, Solorzano C et al (2014) Randomized trial of IV valproate vs metoclopramide vs ketorolac for acute migraine. Neurology 82(11):976–983
Taggart E, Doran S, Kokotillo A et al (2013) Ketorolac in the treatment of acute migraine: a systematic review. Headache 53(2):277–287
Duarte C, Dunaway F, Turner L, Aldag J, Frederick R (1992) Ketorolac versus meperidine and hydroxyzine in the treatment of acute migraine headache: a randomized, prospective, double-blind trial. Ann Emerg Med 21(9):1116–1121
Garnock-Jones KP (2014) Diclofenac potassium powder for oral solution: a review of its use in patients with acute migraine. CNS drugs 28(8):761–768
Diener H-C, Montagna P, Gács G, Lyczak P, Schumann G, Zöller B, Mulder LJ, Siegel J, Edson K (2006) Efficacy and tolerability of diclofenac potassium sachets in migraine: a randomized, double-blind, cross-over study in comparison with diclofenac potassium tablets and placebo. Cephalalgia. 26(5):537–547
Lipton RB, Grosberg B, Singer RP, Pearlman SH, Sorrentino JV, Quiring JN, Saper JR (2010) Efficacy and tolerability of a new powdered formulation of diclofenac potassium for oral solution for the acute treatment of migraine: results from the International Migraine Pain Assessment Clinical Trial (IMPACT). Cephalalgia 30(11):1336–1345
Chen C, Bujanover S, Kareht S, Rapoport AM (2015) Differential pharmacokinetics of diclofenac potassium for oral solution vs immediate-release tablets from a randomized trial: effect of fed and fasting conditions. Headache. 55(2):265–275
Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (IHS). The international classification of headache disorders, 3rd edition. Cephalalgia 2018;38(1):1–211
Insinga RP, Ng-Mak DS, Hanson ME (2011) Costs associated with outpatient, emergency room and inpatient care for migraine in the USA. Cephalalgia 31(15):1570–1575
Acknowledgments
We would like to acknowledge Crystal Serneo for her contribution as research coordinator.
Funding
Funding and supply of study drugs was provided by the sponsor, Depomed Inc.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
We confirm that the individual contributions of the authors are as follows. EE designed the study protocol, analyzed and interpreted the patient data regarding patient characteristics, migraine pain severity, secondary endpoints, and adverse events, and was a major contributor in writing the manuscript. JC provided edits and some post-enrollment analysis.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
We confirm that any aspect of the work covered in this manuscript that has involved either experimental animals or human patients has been conducted with the ethical approval of all relevant bodies and that such approvals are acknowledged within the manuscript.
Consent for publication
We confirm that the manuscript has been read and approved by all named authors and that there are no other persons who satisfied the criteria for authorship but are not listed. We further confirm that the order of authors listed in the manuscript has been approved by all of us.
We confirm that we have given due consideration to the protection of intellectual property associated with this work and that there are no impediments to publication, including the timing of publication, with respect to intellectual property. In so doing, we confirm that we have followed the regulations of our institutions concerning intellectual property.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Additional information
We the undersigned declare that this manuscript is original, has not been published before, and is not currently being considered for publication elsewhere.
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Engel, E.R., Cheng, J. IM ketorolac vs diclofenac potassium powder for oral solution for the acute treatment of severe migraine: a randomized controlled trial. Neurol Sci 41, 537–542 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-019-04157-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-019-04157-y