Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

“Less is better”—always true?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neurological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

The aim of the study is to try to explain what an overtreatment is and which ones are the possible risks related to an excess of simplification in the medical practice, through the description of an emblematic clinical case.

Methods

In the present article, we report the case of a female patient aged 57 who complained about lower back pain and crural neuralgia and had a lumbar and sacral magnetic resonance imaging performed in the Department of Neuroradiology in Bari showing suspicious repetitive bone lesions; therefore, the patient underwent several medical procedures and laboratory exams which ended with a surgical removal of a left L3–L4 foraminal disc herniation and a bone biopsy.

Results

When it was finally possible to exclude any other diseases including thyroid neoplasms, a “reassuring” osteoporosis diagnosis has been made since the lesions were likely to be degenerative and the patient underwent menopause 7 years ago. However, the multiplicity of the lesions of the vertebrae and of the pelvic bones as well as their signal could not be ignored, so that a close magnetic resonance imaging follow-up has been recommended.

Conclusions

The present case is therefore a good example of overtreatment which may lead to delicate questions, investigating any possible mistakes in the diagnosis procedure as well as the role that defensive medicine is playing nowadays on medical procedures and the economic impact that all this can have on our healthcare system. In the end, we may ask ourselves: is “less” better or is “more” always “more?”

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rosenbaum L (2017) The less is more crusade - are we overmedicalizing or oversimplifying? N Engl J Med 377(24):2392–2397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ishiyama M, Fuwa S, Numaguchi Y, Kobayashi N, Saida Y (2010) Pedicle involvement on MR imaging is common in osteoporotic compression fractures. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 31(4):668–673

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Takigawa T, Tanaka M, Sugimoto Y, Tetsunaga T, Nishida K, Ozaki T (2017) Discrimination between malignant and benign vertebral fractures using magnetic resonance imaging. Asian Spine J 11(3):478–483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Sung JK, Jee W, Jung J et al (2014) Differentiation of acute osteoporotic and malignant compression fractures of the spine: use of additive qualitative and quantitative axial diffusion-weighted MR imaging to conventional MR imaging at 3.0 T1. Radiology 271(2)

  5. Zaia A, Eleonori R, Maponi P, Rossi R, Murri R (2006) MR imaging and osteoporosis: fractal lacunarity analysis of trabecular bone. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed 10(3):484–489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Eastell R, O’Neill TW, Hofbauer LC, Langdahl B, Reid IR, Gold DT, Cummings SR (2016) Postmenopausal osteoporosis. Nat Rev Dis Primers 2:16069

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Castro-Mateos I, Pozo JM, Cootes TF, Wilkinson JM, Eastell R, Frangi AF (2014 Jun) Statistical shape and appearance models in osteoporosis. Curr Osteoporos Rep 12(2):163–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Eastell R, O’Neill TW, Hofbauer L et al (2016) Cummings postmenopausal osteoporosis, vol 2. Macmillan Publishers Limited, part of Springer Nature

  9. Orimo H, Hayashi Y, Fukunaga M, Sone T, Fujiwara S, Shiraki M, Kushida K, Miyamoto S, Soen S, Nishimura J, Oh-hashi Y, Hosoi T, Gorai I, Tanaka H, Igai T, Kishimoto H (2001) Diagnostic criteria for primary osteoporosis: year 2000 revision. J Bone Miner Metab 19:331–337

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. El Maghraoui A, Rezqi A, El Mrahi S et al (2014) Osteoporosis, vertebral fractures and metabolic syndrome in postmenopausal women. BMC Endocr Disord 14:93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Takayanagi A, Hariri O, Ghanchi H et al (2017) Unusual metastasis of papillary thyroid cancer to the thoracic spine: a case report, new surgical management proposal, and review of the literature. Cureus. 9(4):1132

    Google Scholar 

  12. Tsuchiya R, Fujimoto K, Inage K et al (2017) Radical surgery of only the anterior elements of the spine at the posterior element fusion level due to metastatic thyroid cancer. Case Rep Orthop 2017:2365808

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Slutzky-Shraga I, Gorshtein A, Popovitzer A et al (2018) Clinical characteristics and disease outcome of patients with non-medullary thyroid cancer and brain metastases. Oncol Lett 15(1):672–676

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Armao D, Semelka RC, Elias J (2012) Radiology’s ethical responsibility for healthcare reform: tempering the overutilization of medical imaging and trimming down a heavyweight. J Magn Reson Imaging 35:512–517

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Franca Dicuonzo.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dicuonzo, F., Purciariello, S., Andresciani, S. et al. “Less is better”—always true?. Neurol Sci 41, 41–47 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-019-04016-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-019-04016-w

Keywords

Navigation