Skip to main content
Log in

Revisiting the diagnostic value of Evans’ index: lessons from an unusual case of normal pressure hydrocephalus with Evans’ index less than 0.3

  • Letter to the Editor
  • Published:
Neurological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

References

  1. Relkin N, Marmarou A, Klinge P, Bergsneider M, Black PM (2005) INPH guidelines, part II: diagnosing idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus. Neurosurgery 57:4–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Mori E, Ishikawa M, Kato T, Kazui H, Miyake H, Miyajima M, Nakajima M, Hashimoto M, Kuriyama N, Tokuda T, Ishii K, Kaijima M, Hirata Y, Saito M, Arai H, Japanese Society of Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus (2012) Guidelines for management of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: second edition. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 52:775–809

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ling H (2016) Clinical approach to progressive supranuclear palsy. J Mov Disord 9:3–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Oh M, Kim JS, Kim JY, Shin KH, Park SH, Kim HO, Moon DH, Oh SJ, Chung SJ, Lee CS (2012) Subregional patterns of preferential striatal dopamine transporter loss differ in Parkinson disease, progressive supranuclear palsy, and multiple-system atrophy. J Nucl Med 53:399–406

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Toma AK, Holl E, Kitchen KD, Watkins LD (2011) Evans’ index revisited: the need for an alternative in normal pressure hydrocephalus. Neurosurgery 68:939–944

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the Soonchunhyang University Research Fund.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kyum-Yil Kwon.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Informed consent

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Park, J.E., Ju, H., Im, K. et al. Revisiting the diagnostic value of Evans’ index: lessons from an unusual case of normal pressure hydrocephalus with Evans’ index less than 0.3. Neurol Sci 40, 2637–2639 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-019-03966-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-019-03966-5

Navigation