Skip to main content
Log in

Accuracy of MDS-UPDRS section IV for detecting motor fluctuations in Parkinson’s disease

  • Brief Communication
  • Published:
Neurological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

In a precedent paper, we validated part IV of the Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) for detecting motor fluctuations in Parkinson’s Disease (PD) patients using a 12-h Waking-Day Motor Assessment (WDMA) as gold standard, showing a high sensitivity (> 80%) and a lower specificity (< 45%). The aim of this study was to validate the Movement Disorder Society-UPDRS (MDS-UPDRS) part IV, especially items 4.3 and 4.5, using the same methodology.

Methods

PD patients attending the Movement Disorders Clinic at the University Hospital in Catania were consecutively enrolled in the study. A diurnal WDMA was performed to detect motor fluctuations. At each time interval, the motor impairment was evaluated using the motor section of the MDS-UPDRS. Presence or absence of motor fluctuations and the type of motor fluctuation were assessed by four blinded expert raters in movement disorders, by evaluating the graphical representations of the WDMA. We evaluated sensitivity and specificity together with 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of items 4.3 and 4.5, using WDMA as gold standard.

Results

We estimated for item 4.3 of the MDS-UPDRS a sensitivity of 74.3% (95% CI 56.7–87.5) and a specificity of 70.6% (95% CI 44–89.7), while for item 4.5, a sensitivity of 67.9% (95% CI 47.6–84.1) and a specificity of 66.7% (95% CI 44.7–84.4).

Conclusions

The present showed a higher specificity level for MDS-UPDRS with respect to the UPDRS, while a slightly lower sensitivity mainly for predictable OFF.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Chase TN, Mouradian MM, Engber TM (1993) Motor response complications and the function of striatal efferent systems. Neurology 43:S23–S26

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ondo WG, Hunter C, Ferrara JM, Mostile G (2012) Apomorphine injections: predictors of initial common adverse events and long term tolerability. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 18:619–622

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Contrafatto D, Mostile G, Nicoletti A, Raciti L, Luca A, Dibilio V, Lanzafame S, Distefano A, Drago F, Zappia M (2011) Single photon emission computed tomography striatal asymmetry index may predict dopaminergic responsiveness in Parkinson disease. Clin Neuropharmacol 34:71–73

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Fahn S, Elton RL, the Members of the UPDRS Development Committee (1987) Unified Parkinson's disease rating scale. In: Fahn S, Marsden CD, Calne DB (eds) Recent developments in Parkinson's disease. Macmillan, London, pp 153–163

    Google Scholar 

  5. Raciti L, Nicoletti A, Mostile G, Bonomo R, Contrafatto D, Dibilio V, Luca A, Sciacca G, Cicero CE, Vasta R, Zappia M (2016) Validation of the UPDRS section IV for detection of motor fluctuations in Parkinson's disease. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 27:98–101

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Goetz CG, Tilley BC, Shaftman SR, Stebbins GT, Fahn S, Martinez-Martin P, Poewe W, Sampaio C, Stern MB, Dodel R, Dubois B, Holloway R, Jankovic J, Kulisevsky J, Lang AE, Lees A, Leurgans S, PA LW, Nyenhuis D, Olanow CW, Rascol O, Schrag A, Teresi JA, van Hilten JJ, LaPelle N, Movement Disorder Society UPDRS Revision Task Force (2008) Movement Disorder Society-sponsored revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS): scale presentation and clinimetric testing results. Mov Disord 23:2129–2170

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mario Zappia.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

The study has been approved by the local ethics committee and it has been performed in accordance with the ethical standards as laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOC 54 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Raciti, L., Nicoletti, A., Mostile, G. et al. Accuracy of MDS-UPDRS section IV for detecting motor fluctuations in Parkinson’s disease. Neurol Sci 40, 1271–1273 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-019-03745-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-019-03745-2

Keywords

Navigation