Association of MTHFR gene polymorphisms with migraine in North Indian population
Polymorphisms in MTHFR gene are mostly associated with increased levels of homocysteine in the absence of dietary folate and are a risk factor for complex neurovascular diseases like migraine. The aim of present case-control study was to determine the association between MTHFR gene polymorphisms (C667T; rs 1801133, A1298C; rs 1801131) with migraine susceptibility. In total, 100 patients with migraine (23with MA and 77 with MO) and age-sex matched 100 healthy controls were included in this study from OPD of ESIC Medical College & Hospital, Faridabad. Genotyping was done by PCR-RFLP method. Genotypic and allelic frequencies were compared by SPSS 24 version. Genotypic results indicated a non-significant increase in frequencies of CT and TT in C667T SNP in migraine patients with control (52 and 10% vs. 42 and 7%: p > 0.05), but CC genotype in A1298C was found to be a risk factor in migraine patients than controls (30 vs. 17% respectively: p < 0.05). On comparing migraine subclasses, migraine with aura (MA) and without aura (MO) with control groups, the present study suggests that in MTHFR polymorphisms, the prevalence of 677CT genotype and T allele in C667T SNP influences susceptibility to MA (p < 0.05) but not to MO. Meanwhile, CC genotype in A1298C SNP could be a risk factor for migraine patients without aura (p < 0.05).
KeywordsMigraine MTHFR gene rs 1801133 rs 1801131 Single nucleotide polymorphisms
The authors sincerely thank Dr. Praveen Malik of ESIC Medical College & Hospital, Faridabad, India, for providing samples. Financial support from UGC, New Delhi, India, to Sukhvinder kaur as a UGC-PDF is also highly acknowledged.
This work was supported by PDF given to Sukhvinder Kaur by Union Grant Commission (UGC), New Delhi, India.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 6.Stovner LJ, Hagen K (2006) Prevalence, burden, and cost of headache disorders. Curr Opin Neurol 19(3):281–285. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.wco.0000227039.16071.92 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 8.Kowa H, Yasui K, Takeshima T, Urakami K, Sakai F, Nakashima K (2000) The homozygous C677T mutation in the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene is a genetic risk factor for migraine. Am J Med Genet 96(6):762–764. https://doi.org/10.1002/1096-8628(20001204)96:6<762::AID-AJMG12>3.0.CO;2-X CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 9.Friedman G, Goldschmidt N, Friedlander Y, Ben-Yehuda A, Selhub J, Babaey S, Mendel M, Kidron M, Bar-On H (1999) A common mutation A1298C in human methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene: association with plasma total homocysteine and folate concentrations. J Nutr 129(9):1656–1661CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 16.Schürks M, Zee RYL, Buring JE, Kurth T (2009) ACE D/I polymorphism, migraine, and cardiovascular disease in women. Neurology 72(7):650–656. https://doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000342517.97178.f6 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 19.Lea RA, Ovcaric M, Sundholm J, Solyom L, Macmillan J, Griffiths LR (2005) Genetic variants of angiotensin converting enzyme and methylenetetrahy-drofolate reductase may act in combination to increase migraine susceptibility. Brain Res Mol Brain Res 136(1-2):112–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molbrainres.2005.01.006 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 20.Lin JJ, Wang PJ, Chen CH, Yueh KC, Lin SZ, Harn HJ (2005) Homo-zygous deletion genotype of angiotensin converting enzyme confers protection against migraine in man. Acta Neurol Taiwanica 14(3):120–125Google Scholar
- 22.Lorenz AL, Kahre T, Mihailov E, Nikopensius T, Lotman EM, Metspalu A, Kolk A (2014) Are methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) gene polymorphisms C677T and A1298C associated with higher risk of pediatric migraine in boys and girls? J Biomed Sci Eng 7(08):464–472. https://doi.org/10.4236/jbise.2014.78049 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 30.Saeedi S, Owji AA, Ansari M, Ghafarpour M, Ebrahimi A, Fallah MS (2015) MTHFR gene polymorphisms and susceptibility to migraine attacks. Arch Med Lab Sci 1(2):61–66Google Scholar