Systematic assessment and characterization of chronic pain in multiple sclerosis patients
- 645 Downloads
Pain is one of the most disabling clinical symptoms in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). Several studies have already assessed the prevalence of pain in MS patients, reporting variable results, probably due to methodological differences. The aim of this single-centre cross-sectional study was to define the prevalence and characteristics of chronic pain in a population of MS patients using validated tools, and to analyse these data in relation to demographic and clinical features, including disease duration and disability (EDSS and its single functional system scores). Of 397 enrolled patients, 23 were excluded due to a Beck’s Depression Inventory Score > 19. In the remaining 374 patients, the overall prevalence of chronic pain was 52.1%, most frequently affecting the lower limbs (36.9%). Neuropathic pain was the most frequent type of chronic pain (89 patients, overall prevalence of 23.7%) and was associated with a sensory functional system involvement. Pain intensity was significantly higher in patients with neuropathic pain as opposed to patients with non-neuropathic pain. Patients with chronic pain and, in particular, patients with neuropathic pain had significantly higher EDSS scores than those without pain. Only 24% of patients with chronic pain and 33% of patients with neuropathic pain were on a specific long-lasting treatment for pain. The present study supports the routine assessment of neuropathic pain in MS patients, especially in those with a sensory functional system involvement, in order to avoid underdiagnosing and undertreating a potentially disabling condition.
KeywordsPain Multiple sclerosis Neuropathic symptoms Pain treatment
Compliance with ethical standards
All study procedures were conducted according to the Declaration of Helsinki and were approved by the Modena ethics committee (protocol nr. 181/15). All enrolled subjects presented consent capacity and gave written informed consent to the study.
Conflict of interest
DP received the “Premio Anna Paola Batocchi” 2nd edition from Fondazione Cesare Serono. DF declares that there is no conflict of interest. FM declares that there is no conflict of interest. GD declares that there is no conflict of interest. AMS declares that there is no conflict of interest. FV declares that there is no conflict of interest. PS declares that there is no conflict of interest. GP declares that there is no conflict of interest. VN declares that there is no conflict of interest. MP declares that there is no conflict of interest. MM declares that there is no conflict of interest. CV declares that there is no conflict of interest.
- 9.O’Connor AB, Schwid SR, Herrmann DN, Markman JD, Dworkin RH (2008) Pain associated with multiple sclerosis: systematic review and proposed classification. Pain 137(1):96–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2007.08.024
- 12.Treede RD, Jensen TS, Campbell JN, Cruccu G, Dostrovsky JO, Griffin JW, Hansson P, Hughes R, Nurmikko T, Serra J (2008) Neuropathic pain: redefinition and a grading system for clinical and research purposes. Neurology 70(18):1630–1635. https://doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000282763.29778.59 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 13.Turk DC, Okifuji A (2001) Pain terms and taxonomies. In: Loeser D, Butler SH, Chapman JJ, Turk DC (eds) Bonica’s Manag. Pain, 3rd edn. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 18–25Google Scholar
- 14.Main CJ, Spanswick CC (2000) Pain management: an interdisciplinary approach. Churchill Livingstone, LondonGoogle Scholar
- 25.Polman CH, Reingold SC, Banwell B, Clanet M, Cohen JA, Filippi M, Fujihara K, Havrdova E, Hutchinson M, Kappos L, Lublin FD, Montalban X, O'Connor P, Sandberg-Wollheim M, Thompson AJ, Waubant E, Weinshenker B, Wolinsky JS (2011) Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2010 revisions to the McDonald criteria. Ann Neurol 69(2):292–302. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.22366 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 28.Caraceni A, Mendoza TR, Mencaglia E, Baratella C, Edwards K, Forjaz MJ, Martini C, Serlin RC, de Conno F, Cleeland CS (1996) A validation study of an Italian version of the Brief Pain Inventory (Breve Questionario per la Valutazione del Dolore). Pain 65(1):87–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3959(95)00156-5 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 30.Bouhassira D, Attal N, Fermanian J, Alchaar H, Gautron M, Masquelier E, Rostaing S, Lanteri-Minet M, Collin E, Grisart J, Boureau F (2004) Development and validation of the Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory. Pain 108(3):248–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2003.12.024 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 32.Padua L, Briani C, Jann S, Nobile-Orazio E, Pazzaglia C, Morini A, Mondelli M, Ciaramitaro P, Cavaletti G, Cocito D, Fazio R, Santoro L, Galeotti F, Carpo M, Plasmati R, Benedetti L, Schenone A, Marchettini P, Cruccu G (2009) Validation of the Italian version of the Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory in peripheral nervous system diseases. Neurol Sci 30(2):99–106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-009-0025-y CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 33.Beck AT, Ward CH, Mendelson M et al (1961) An inventory for measuring depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry 4(6):561–571. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.1961.01710120031004 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 40.Unruh AM Gender variations in clinical pain experience. Pain 65:123–167Google Scholar
- 41.Truini A, Galeotti F, La Cesa S, di Rezze S, Biasiotta A, di Stefano G, Tinelli E, Millefiorini E, Gatti A, Cruccu G (2012) Mechanisms of pain in multiple sclerosis: a combined clinical and neurophysiological study. Pain 153(10):2048–2054. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2012.05.024 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar