Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Validity, reliability, and sensitivity to change of the myasthenia gravis activities of daily living profile in a sample of Italian myasthenic patients

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neurological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to report on the validity, reliability, and sensitivity of the myasthenia gravis activities of daily living profile (MG-ADL) in a sample of Italian patients. Patients with myasthenia gravis (MG) completed a protocol that included the MG-ADL, the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0), the Besta Neurological Institute rating scale for myasthenia gravis, and the MG-composite. Cronbach’s alpha was used to test reliability, Spearman’s correlation and intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) to test short-term test-retest, Kruskal-Wallis test to assess differences in MG-ADL between patients with different disease severity, and Wilcoxon signed-rank test to assess sensitivity to change. In total, 58 patients were enrolled: 44 were females, mean MG duration 10.5 ± 10.4 years, mean MG-ADL 3.98 ± 3.07. The MG-ADL showed good internal consistency (alpha = .774), stability (test-retest correlation = .98, ICC = .97). It was superior to the WHODAS 2.0 in differentiating patients with different MG type and severity (P < .001), it showed higher sensitivity to change (P = .001 for improved and P = .007 for worsened patients) and higher correlation with the MG-composite (RHO = .625). Our analysis shows that the Italian version of the MG-ADL is valid, reliable, stable, and sensitive to change.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mantegazza R, Baggi F, Antozzi C, Confalonieri P, Morandi L, Bernasconi P, Andreetta F, Simoncini O, Campanella A, Beghi E, Cornelio F (2003) Myasthenia gravis (MG): epidemiological data and prognostic factors. Ann N Y Acad Sci 998:413–423

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Vincent A, Palace J, Hilton-Jones D (2001) Myasthenia gravis. Lancet 357:2122–2128

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Burns TM (2010) History of outcome measures for myasthenia gravis. Muscle Nerve 42:5–13

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Raggi A, Schiavolin S, Leonardi M, Antozzi C, Baggi F, Maggi L, Mantegazza R (2014) Development of the MG-DIS: an ICF-based disability assessment instrument for myasthenia gravis. Disabil Rehabil 36:546–555

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Muppidi S (2012) The myasthenia gravis—specific activities of daily living profile. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1274:114–119

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Muppidi S, Wolfe GI, Conaway M, Burns TM, MG composite and MG-QOL15 study group (2011) MG-ADL: still a relevant outcome measure. Muscle Nerve 44:727–731

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cioncoloni D, Casali S, Ginanneschi F, Carone M, Veronica B, Rossi A, Giannini F (2016) Major motor-functional determinants associated with poor self-reported health-related quality of life in myasthenia gravis patients. Neurol Sci 37:717–723

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Wolfe GI, Kaminski HJ, Aban IB et al (2016) Randomized trial of thymectomy in myasthenia gravis. N Engl J Med 375:511–522

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Sanders DB, Hart IK, Mantegazza R, Shukla SS, Siddiqi ZA, De Baets MH, Melms A, Nicolle MW, Solomons N, Richman DP (2008) An international, phase III, randomized trial of mycophenolate mofetil in myasthenia gravis. Neurology 71:400–406

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Antozzi C, Brenna G, Baggi F, Camera G, Maggi L, Rezzani C, Montomoli C, Mantegazza R (2016) Validation of the Besta Neurological Institute rating scale for myasthenia gravis. Muscle Nerve 53:32–37

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Burns TM, Conaway M, Sanders DB, MG Composite and MG-QOL15 Study Group (2010) The MG composite: a valid and reliable tool for myasthenia gravis. Neurology 74:1434–1440

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Garin O, Ayuso-Mateos JL, Almansa J, Nieto M, Chatterji S, Vilagut G, Alonso J, Cieza A, Svestkova O, Burger H, Racca V, Francescutti C, Vieta E, Kostanjsek N, Raggi A, Leonardi M, Ferrer M, MHADIE consortium (2010) Validation of the “World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule, WHODAS-2” in patients with chronic diseases. Health Qual Life Outcomes 8:51

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Federici S, Bracalenti M, Meloni F, Luciano JV (2016) World Health Organization disability assessment schedule 2.0: an international systematic review. Disabil Rehabil 11(1):167. doi:10.1080/09638288.2016.1223177

    Google Scholar 

  14. Raggi A, Leonardi M, Schiavolin S, Antozzi C, Brenna G, Maggi L, Mantegazza R (2016) Validation of the MG-DIS: a disability assessment for myasthenia gravis. J Neurol 263:871–882

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Jaretzki A 3rd, Barohn RJ, Ernstoff RM, Kaminski HJ, Keesey JC, Penn AS, Sanders DB (2000) Myasthenia gravis: recommendations for clinical research standards. Task Force of the Medical Scientific Advisory Board of the Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America. Neurology 55:16–23

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Burns TM, Conaway MR, Cutter GR, Sanders DB, Muscle Study Group (2008) Construction of an efficient evaluative instrument for myasthenia gravis: the MG composite. Muscle Nerve 38:1553–1562

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lipka AF, Vrinten C, van Zwet EW, Schimmel KJM, Cornel MC, Kuijpers MR, Hekster YA, Weinreich SS, Verschuuren JJGM (2014) Ephedrine treatment for autoimmune myasthenia gravis. Neuromuscul Disord 27:259–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhao CB, Zhang X, Zhang H, Hu XQ, Lu JH, Lu CZ, Xiao BG (2011) Clinical efficacy and immunological impact of tacrolimus in Chinese patients with generalized myasthenia gravis. Int Immunopharmacol 11:519–524

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Tao X, Wang W, Jing F, Wang Z, Chen Y, Wei D, Huang X (2017) Long-term efficacy and side effects of low-dose tacrolimus for the treatment of myasthenia gravis. Neurol Sci 38:325–330

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alberto Raggi.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Funding

This study was supported by Besta Institute Foundation.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Raggi, A., Antozzi, C., Baggi, F. et al. Validity, reliability, and sensitivity to change of the myasthenia gravis activities of daily living profile in a sample of Italian myasthenic patients. Neurol Sci 38, 1927–1931 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-017-3083-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-017-3083-6

Keywords

Navigation