Abstract
This document presents the guidelines for anti-ganglioside antibody testing that have been developed following a consensus process built on questionnaire-based surveys, internet contacts, and discussions at workshops of the sponsoring Italian Association of Neuroimmunology (AINI) congresses. Main clinical information on dysimmune peripheral neuropathies, indications and limits of anti-ganglioside antibody testing, instructions for result interpretation, and an agreed laboratory protocol (Appendix) are reported for the communicative community of neurologists and clinical pathologists.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Willison HJ, Yuki N (2002) Peripheral neuropathies and anti-glycolipid antibodies. Brain 125:2591–2625
Willison HJ (2007) Gangliosides as targets for autoimmune injury to the nervous system. J Neurochem 103(Suppl. 1):143–149
Svennerholm L (1964) The gangliosides. J Lipid Res 5:145–155
Willison HJ, O'Leary CP, Veitch J et al (2001) The clinical and laboratory features of chronic sensory ataxic neuropathy with anti-disialosyl IgM antibodies. Brain 124:1968–1977
Nobile-Orazio E, Gallia F, Terenghi F, Allaria S, Giannotta C, Carpo M (2008) How useful are anti-neural IgM antibodies in the diagnosis of chronic immune-mediated neuropathies? J Neurol Sci 266:156–163
Feldman EL, Hughes RA, Willison HJ (2015) Progress in inflammatory neuropathy—the legacy of Dr Jack Griffin. Nat Rev Neurol 11:646–650
Kuwabara S Axonal Guillain-Barré syndrome is underestimated in Europe? (2010) J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 81:1063
Willison HJ, Veitch J, Swan AV et al (1999) Inter-laboratory validation of an ELISA for the determination of serum anti-ganglioside antibodies. Eur J Neurol 6:71–77
Caudie C, Quittard Pinon A, Bouhour F, Vial C, Garnier L, Fabien N (2013) Comparison of commercial tests for detecting multiple anti-ganglioside autoantibodies in patients with well-characterized immune-mediated peripheral neuropathies. Clin Lab 59:1277–1287
Steck A, Yuki N, Graus F (2013) Antibody testing in peripheral nerve disorders. Handb Clin Neurol 115:189–212
Willison HJ (2014) Glycoconjugates and neuroimmunological diseases. Adv Neurobiol 9:543–566
Willison HJ, Ang W, Gilhus NE, Graus F, Liblau R, Vedeler C, Vincent A (2000) EFNS task force report: a questionnaire-based survey on the service provision and quality assurance for determination of diagnostic autoantibody tests in European neuroimmunology centres. European Federation of Neurological Societies. Eur J Neurol 7:625–628
Kuijf ML, van Doorn PA, Tio-Gillen AP et al (2005) Diagnostic value of anti-GM1 ganglioside serology and validation of the INCAT-ELISA. J Neurol Sci 239:37–44
Giannotta C, Di Pietro D, Gallia F, Nobile-Orazio E (2015) Anti-sulfatide IgM antibodies in peripheral neuropathy: to test or not to test? Eur J Neurol 22:879–882
Willison HJ, Gilhus NE, Graus F et al (2010) Use of antibody testing in nervous system disorders. In: European Handbook of Neurological Management, vol 1. Wiley-Blackwell, pp 75–80
Kaida K, Morita D, Kanzaki M et al (2004) Ganglioside complexes as new target antigens in Guillain–Barré syndrome. Ann Neurol 56:567–571
Kaida K, Morita D, Kanzaki M et al (2007) Anti-ganglioside complex antibodies associated with severe disability in GBS. J Neuroimmunol 182:212–218
Kanzaki M, Kaida KI, Ueda M et al (2008) Ganglioside complexes containing GQ1b as targets in Miller Fisher and Guillain-Barrè syndromes. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 79:1148–1152
Galban-Horcajo F, Fitzpatrick AM, Hutton AJ et al (2013) Antibodies to heteromeric glycolipid complexes in multifocal motor neuropathy. Eur J Neurol 20:62–70
Galban-Horcajo F, Halstead SK, McGonigal R, Willison HJ (2014) The application of glycosphingolipid arrays to autoantibody detection in neuroimmunological disorders. Curr Opin Chem Biol 18:78–86
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Appendix
Appendix
-
1.0
Preanalytical procedures
Refer to the document on ‘Diagnostics of autoimmune encephalitis associated with antibodies against neuronal surface antigens’
-
2.0
Analytical Procedures
-
2.1
Enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for anti-GM1 IgG/IgM and anti-GQ1b IgG.
-
2.1.1
Materials and reagents
-
2.1.1.1
Microplates for ELISA.
-
2.1.1.2
Antigens for microplate coating: monosialoganglioside GM1 (Sigma) and tetrasialoganglioside GQ1b (Calbiochem).
-
2.1.1.3
Buffers and antisera: bovine serum albumin (BSA), NaCl, NaH2PO4, Na2HPO4, 3% H2O2, citric acid, o-phenylendiamine (OPD, 10 mg tabs), H2SO4, distilled H2O, peroxidase-conjugated rabbit anti-human IgG/IgM (Dako), methanol, 100% ethanol.
-
2.1.2
Reagent preparation
-
2.1.2.1
Antigens for microplate coating: reconstitute lyophils with methanol: GM1, concentration of 1 mg/mL; GQ1b, concentration of 0.1 mg/mL (store at −20 °C for 6 months).
-
2.1.2.2
Non-specific binding site blocking solution: for 200 mL, dissolve in distilled H2O: 4 g BSA; 1.2 g NaH2PO4; 2.4 g NaCl (pH 7.4).
-
2.1.2.3
Washing solution: for 500 mL, dissolve in distilled H2O: 1.0 g BSA; 3.0 g NaH2PO4; 6.0 g NaCl (pH 7.4).
-
2.1.2.4
Stock solutions: Na2HPO4 0.2 M: dissolve 2.85 g Na2HPO4 in 100 ml of distilled H2O (mildly heat to favour salt dissolving). Citric acid 0.1 M: dissolve 2.1 g citric acid in 100 ml of distilled H2O (store at 4 °C for 1 month).
-
2.1.2.5
Staining solutions: use stock solutions; for 25 mL, mix: 6.4 mL, Na2HPO4 0.2 M; 12.5 mL, H2O; 6.1 mL, citric acid 0.1 M (pH 5.09). Add an OPD Table 10 min before using; keep it in the dark). Warning! OPD is carcinogenic: use gloves and chemical hood. Add 100 μL of 3% H2O2 immediately before using the solution.
-
2.1.2.6
Blocking solutions: H2SO4 0.1 M: dilute 556 μL of H2SO4 18 M in 100 mL of distilled H2O.
-
2.1.3
Samples and controls
-
2.1.3.1
Dilute serum samples and positive and negative controls at 1:640 (for anti-GM1), or 1:1280 (for anti-GQ1b) using the blocking solution.
-
2.1.4
Procedure
-
2.1.4.1
Divide 96-microwell plates into two areas, and coat half of the microwells with 1 μg GM1 or GQ1b in 100 μL of 100% ethanol/well, the other half of the microwells with 100 μL of 100% ethanol/well.
-
2.1.4.2
Let microwells dry at 4 °C overnight.
-
2.1.4.3
Add 200 μL/well of blocking solution; incubate at 4 °C for 4 hours.
-
2.1.4.4
Remove blocking solution by aspiration; wash with 200 μL/well of washing solution.
-
2.1.4.5
Add 100 μL/well of samples and controls, each in quadruplicate (in duplicate in antigen-coated wells, and in duplicate in non-antigen-coated wells); add 100 μL/well of blocking solution to two antigen-coated wells, and to two non-antigen-coated for blank readings; incubate at 4 °C overnight.
-
2.1.4.6
Remove samples and controls by aspiration; wash with 200 μL/well of washing solution (5 times).
-
2.1.4.7
Add 100 μL/well of anti-human IgG/IgM, previously 1:500 diluted in blocking solution; incubate at 4 °C for 1 hour.
-
2.1.4.8
Wash (point 2.1.4.6).
-
2.1.4.9
Add 100 μL/well of staining solution; incubate at room temperature for 1 hour.
-
2.1.4.10
Block with 50 μL/well of staining blocking solution.
-
2.1.4.11
Read with spectrophotometers at 492 nm, using the appropriate wells as blanks.
-
2.1.5
Readings and result interpretation
Calculate results by subtracting optical density (OD) mean values of non-antigen-coated wells to those of the corresponding antigen-coated wells; OD <0.1 indicate negative samples, OD between 0.1–0.5 positive samples (titer corresponding to the starting dilution); samples with OD >0.5 should be further titered.
-
2.2
Commercial ELISAs and dot-line blots for anti-ganglioside antibody detection.
Certified commercial kits for the contemporary detection of a wide array of anti-ganglioside antibody can be used for routine diagnostics, following the manufacturer’s instructions.
-
3.0
Quality control and sample storage
Refer to the document on ‘Diagnostics of the neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD)’
-
4.0
Report
-
4.1
Qualitative results (positive/negative/low positive) should be reported.
-
4.2
Positive samples on ELISA should be titered (end-point dilution); titering on immuno-line/dot blots is expensive and thus optional.
-
4.3
Samples with OD between 0.05–0.10 on the herein-reported ELISA could be considered as low positive (no diagnostic meaning).
-
4.4
Reports should contain the following information:
-
i)
Type of method: in-house ELISA; commercial ELISA or immuno-line/dot blot with the manufacturer.
-
ii)
Reference values correspond to the testing dilutions: <1:640 (anti-GM1), <1:1280 (anti-GQ1b) for the herein-reported ELISA, or those entailed by commercial kits.
-
iii)
Comments: refer to the document on ‘Cerebrospinal fluid analysis and the determination of oligoclonal bands’.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Franciotta, D., Gastaldi, M., Benedetti, L. et al. Diagnostics of dysimmune peripheral neuropathies. Neurol Sci 38 (Suppl 2), 243–247 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-017-3025-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-017-3025-3