Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Effect of sensory training of the posterior thigh on trunk control and upper extremity functions in stroke patients

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neurological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Some studies show that sensorial rehabilitation is effective on functionality. The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of sensory training of the posterior thigh on the functionality of upper extremity and trunk control in stroke patients. Thirteen subjects (53.23 ± 6.82 years) were included in the intervention group and 13 subjects (58.69 ± 5.94 years) in the control group. The control and intervention groups were treated for ten sessions. The control group was treated only with neurodevelopmental treatment, and the intervention group was treated with sensorial training on the posterior thigh in addition to the neurodevelopmental treatment. Subjects were evaluated three times, pre- and post-treatment and 10 days after finishing the treatment. Trunk control was assessed by the Trunk Impairment Scale, reaching function by the Functional Reach Test, balance by the Berg Balance Test, upper extremity symptom and disability severity by the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, Hand and Minnesota, independence level in daily living activities by the Barthel Index, and sensory function of the posterior thigh by sensorial tests. In the post-treatment assessment, it was found that the intervention group was better than the control group in the parameter of functional reach while sitting (p < 0.005). In the third assessment, reaching while sitting and independence level were better in the intervention group than the control group (p < 0.005). There was no difference in sensorial assessment between the groups. Sensory training of the posterior thigh should be included in the rehabilitation programme of stroke patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Carey LM (1995) Somatosensory loss after stroke. Crit Rev Phys Rehabil Med 7:51–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Winward CE, Halligan PW, Wade DT (1999) Current practice and clinical relevance of somatosensory assessment after stroke. Clin Rehabil 13:48–55

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Schabrun SM, Hillier S (2009) Evidence for the retraining of sensation after stroke: a systematic review. Clin Rehabil 23:27

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lennon S, Ashburn A (2000) The Bobath concept for stroke patients, disability and rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil 22(15):665–674

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kılınç M, Avcu F, Onursal O, Ayvat E, Savcun Demirci C, Aksu Yildirim S (2016) The effects of Bobath-based trunk exercises on trunk control, functional capacity, balance, and gait: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Top Stroke Rehabil 23(1):50–58

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sullivan JE, Hedman LD (2008) Sensory dysfunction following stroke: incidence, significance, examination, and intervention. Top Stroke Rehabil 15(3):200–217

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Doyle SD, Bennett S, Dudgeon B (2014) Upper limb post-stroke sensory impairments: the survivor’s experience. Disabil Rehabil 36(12):993–1000

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Taub E (1980) Somatosensory deafferentation research with monkeys: implications for rehabilitation medicine. In: Ince LP (ed) Behavioral psychology in rehabilitation medicine: clinical applications. William & Wilkins, Baltimore, pp 371–401

    Google Scholar 

  9. Smania N, Montagnana B, Faccioli S, Fiaschi A, Aglioti SA (2003) Rehabilitation of somatic sensation and related deficit of motor control in patients with pure sensory stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 84:1692–1702

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Carey LM, Matyas TA, Oke LE (1993) Sensory loss in stroke patients: effective training of tactile and proprioceptive discrimination. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 74:602–611

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Yekutiel M, Guttman E (1993) A controlled trial of the retraining of the sensory function of the hand in stroke patients. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 56:241–244

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Lynch EA, Hillier SL, Stiller K, Rachel R, Campanella RR, Fisher PH (2007) Sensory retraining of the lower limb after acute stroke: a randomized controlled pilot trial.  Arch Phys Med Rehabil 88(9):1101–1107

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Niam S, Cheung W, Sullivan PE, Kent S, Gu X (1999) Balance and physical impairments after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 80:1227–1233

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hsu AL, Tang PF, Jan MH (2003) Analysis of impairments influencing gait velocity and asymmetry of hemiplegic patients after mild to moderate stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 84:1185–1193

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Nadeau S, Arsenault AB, Gravel D, Bourbonnais D (1999) Analysis of the clinical factors determining natural and maximal gait speeds in adults with a stroke. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 78:123–130

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Wrisley DM, Whitney SL (2004) The effect of foot position on the modified clinical test of sensory interaction and balance. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 85(2):335–338

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Dean C, Shepherd RB, Roger D, Adams S (1999) Sitting balance II: reach direction and thigh support affect the contribution of the lower limbs when reaching beyond arm’s length in sitting. Gait Posture 10:147–153

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Dellon AL, Mackinnon SE, Crosby PM (1987) Reliability of two-point discrimination measurements. J Hand Surg Am 12(5 Pt 1):693–696

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Bronstein AM, Brandt T, Woollacott M (2004) Clinical disorders of balance, posture and gait, 2nd edn. Hodder Arnold Publication, London

    Google Scholar 

  20. Shumway-Cook A, Woollacott M (2012) Motor control: translating research into clinical practice, 4th edn. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, p 641

    Google Scholar 

  21. Magnusson M, Johansson K, Johansson BB (1994) Sensory stimulation promotes normalization of postural control after stroke. Am Heart Assoc 25:1176–1180

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Teyssedre C, Zattara M, Lino F, Bouisset S (1993) Does postural muscular activity associated with a pointing task depend on handedness? In: Proceedings of the XIVth International Society of Biomechanics conference, Paris, pp 1332–1333

  23. Lino F, Bouisset S (1993) Is velocity of pointing movement performed in a sitting posture increased by upper body instability? In: Proceedings of the XIVth International Society of Biomechanics conference, Paris, pp 802–803

  24. Morioka S, Yagi F (2003) Effects of perceptual learning exercises on standing balance using a hardness discrimination task in hemiplegic patients following stroke: a randomized controlled pilot trial. Clin Rehabil 17:600–607

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Ruch TC, Fulton JF, German WJ (1938) Sensory discrimination in monkeys, chimpanzee, and man after lesions of parietal lobe. Arch Neurol Psychiatry 39:919–938

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Mustafa Kemal University School of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, Hatay, Turkey

    Esra Dogru Huzmeli

  2. Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Science, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey

    Sibel Aksu Yildirim & Muhammed Kilinc

Authors
  1. Esra Dogru Huzmeli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sibel Aksu Yildirim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Muhammed Kilinc
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Esra Dogru Huzmeli.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

There is no conflict of interest or funding.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dogru Huzmeli, E., Yildirim, S.A. & Kilinc, M. Effect of sensory training of the posterior thigh on trunk control and upper extremity functions in stroke patients. Neurol Sci 38, 651–657 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-017-2822-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-017-2822-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation