To test the factorial structure of the Italian version of the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) using a confirmatory approach and to assess its psychometric properties. ISI questionnaire was completed by 272 patients (average age 41.28, range 18–73) with insomnia diagnosis performed by a sleep medicine physician and retrospectively enrolled in the study. All patients underwent Cognitive Behavioral Treatment for Insomnia (CBT-I) and completed sleep diaries before starting the treatment. Data from sleep diaries were analyzed for assessing concurrent validity of the ISI. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) for ordinal Likert-type items was applied to compare four competing models proposed in the literature. 244 patients, out of the 272, completed the ISI at the end of CBT-I. A comparison of ISI score before and after treatment was performed. The CFA analysis confirmed the presence of three main factors conceptualized as severity and impact of the disease along with sleep satisfaction. Significant correlations of the first three items of the questionnaire, investigating three different subtypes of insomnia, and the subjective measures from the sleep diaries were found, thus supporting the concurrent validity of the test. Sleep efficiency (SE) had a significant inverse correlation with the severity and satisfaction factors and with ISI’s total score. After CBT-I treatment, a significant reduction of ISI’s scores was observed, thus confirming the effectiveness of the CBT-I treatment. The internal reliability coefficient was 0.75. The ISI questionnaire maintains good psychometric properties in the Italian version, thus confirming that this instrument is reliable for detecting insomnia severity and identifying patients’ symptoms.
Insomnia Severity Index Insomnia Sleep diary Confirmatory factor analysis Cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Yazdi Z, Sadeghniiat-Haghighi K, Zohal MA, Elmizadeh K (2012) Validity and reliability of the Iranian version of the Insomnia Severity Index. Malays J Med Sci 19:31–36PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
Fernandez-Mendoza J, Rodriguez-Muñoz A, Vela-Bueno A, Olavarrieta-Bernardino S, Calhoun SL, Bixler EO, Vgontzas AN (2012) The Spanish version of the Insomnia Severity Index: a confirmatory factor analysis. Sleep Med 13:207–210CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Sadeghniiat-Haghighi K, Montazeri A, Khajeh-Mehrizi A, Nedjat S, Aminian O (2014) The Insomnia Severity Index: cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric evaluation of a Persian version. Qual Life Res 23:533–537CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Morin CM, Belleville G, Bélanger L, Ivers H (2011) The insomnia severity index: psychometric indicators to detect insomnia cases and evaluate treatment response. Sleep 34:601–608PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
Rosseel Y (2012) lavaan: an R Package for structural equation modeling. J Stat Softw 48:1–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Revelle W (2015) psych: procedures for personality and psychological research, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois, USA, http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=psych. Version = 1.5.8. Retrieved 30 Aug 2015
Savard MH, Savard J, Simard S, Ivers H (2005) Empirical validation of the Insomnia Severity Index in cancer patients. Psychooncology 14:429–441CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Chung KF, Kan KKK, Yeung WF (2011) Assessing insomnia in adolescents: comparison of insomnia severity index, Athens insomnia scale and sleep quality index. Sleep Med 12:463–470CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Riemann D, Spiegelhalder K, Feige B, Voderholzer U, Berger M, Perlis M, Nissen C (2010) The hyperarousal model of insomnia: a review of the concept and its evidence. Sleep Med Rev 14:19–31CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Natale V, Léger D, Bayon V, Erbacci A, Tonetti L, Fabbri M, Martoni M (2015) The consensus sleep diary: quantitative criteria for primary insomnia diagnosis. Psychosom Med 77:413–418CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar