Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

An updated Italian normative dataset for the Stroop color word test (SCWT)

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neurological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Stroop color and word test (SCWT) is widely used to evaluate attention, information processing speed, selective attention, and cognitive flexibility. Normative values for the Italian population are available only for selected age groups, or for the short version of the test. The aim of this study was to provide updated normal values for the full version, balancing groups across gender, age decades, and education. Two kinds of indexes were derived from the performance of 192 normal subjects, divided by decade (from 20 to 90) and level of education (4 levels: 3–5; 6–8; 9–13; >13 years). They were (i) the correct answers achieved for each table in the first 30 s (word items, WI; color items, CI; color word items, CWI) and (ii) the total time required for reading the three tables (word time, WT; color time, CT; color word time, CWT). For each index, the regression model was evaluated using age, education, and gender as independent variables. The normative data were then computed following the equivalent scores method. In the regression model, age and education significantly influenced the performance in each of the 6 indexes, whereas gender had no significant effect. This study confirms the effect of age and education on the main indexes of the Stroop test and provides updated normative data for an Italian healthy population, well balanced across age, education, and gender. It will be useful to Italian researchers studying attentional functions in health and disease.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Stroop JR (1935) Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. J Exp Psychol 18:643–662

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Neill WT (1977) Inhibitory and facilitatory processes in selective attention. J Exp Psychol-Hum Percept Perform 3:444–450. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.3.3.444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Barkley RA (1997) Behavioral inhibition, sustained attention and executive functions: constructing a unifying theory of ADHD. Psychol Bull 121:65–94. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.121.1.65

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Chen Z, Lei X, Ding C, Li H, Chen A (2012) The neural mechanisms of semantic and response conflicts: an fMRI study of practice-related effects in the Stroop task. Neuroimage 66C:577–584. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.10.028

    Google Scholar 

  5. Roberts KL, Hall DA (2008) Examining a supramodal network for conflict processing: a systematic review and novel functional magnetic resonance imaging data for related visual and auditory stroop tasks. J Cogn Neurosci 20:1063–1078. doi:10.1162/jocn.2008.20074

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Liu X, Banich MT, Jacobson BL, Tanabe JL (2004) Common and distinct neural substrates of attentional control in an integrated Simon and spatial Stroop task as assessed by event-related fMRI. Neuroimage 3:1097–1106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Roelofs A, van Turennout M, Coles MG (2006) Anterior cingulate cortex activity can be independent of response conflict in Stroop-like tasks. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103:13884–13889

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Amieva H, Phillips LH, Della Sala S, Henry JD (2004) Inhibitory functioning in Alzheimer’s disease. Brain 2004(127):949–964

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Dopper EG, Rombouts SA, Jiskoot LC, den Heijer T, de Graaf JR, de Koning I, Hammerschlag AR, Seelaar H, Seeley WW, Veer IM, van Buchem MA, Rizzu P, van Swieten JC (2014) Structural and functional brain connectivity in presymptomatic familial frontotemporal dementia. Neurology 83:e19–e26. doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000000583

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Johns EK, Phillips NA, Belleville S, Goupil D, Babins L, Kelner N, Ska B, Gilbert B, Inglis G, Panisset M, de Boysson C, Chertkow H (2009) Executive functions in frontotemporal dementia and Lewy body dementia. Neuropsychology 23:765–777. doi:10.1037/a0016792

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Salvadori E, Poggesi A, Pracucci G, Inzitari D, Pantoni L (2015) Development and psychometric properties of a neuropsychological battery for mild cognitive impairment with small vessel disease: the VMCI-Tuscany Study. J Alzheimers Dis 43:1313–1323. doi:10.3233/JAD-141449

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kramer JH, Reed BR, Mungas D, Weiner MW, Chui HC (2002) Executive dysfunction in subcortical ischaemic vascular disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 72:217–220

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Videbech P, Ravnkilde B, Gammelgaard L, Egander A, Clemmensen K, Rasmussen NA, Gjedde A, Rosenberg R (2004) The Danish PET/depression project: performance on Stroop’s test linked to white matter lesions in the brain. Psychiatry Res 130:117–130

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Westerhausen R, Kompus K, Hugdahl K (2011) Impaired cognitive inhibition in schizophrenia: a meta-analysis of the Stroop interference effect. Schizophr Res 133:172–181. doi:10.1016/j.schres.2011.08.025

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lallart E, Jouvent R, Herrmann FR, Perez-Diaz F, Lallart X, Beauchet O, Allali G (2014) Gait control and executive dysfunction in early schizophrenia. J Neural Transm 121:443–450. doi:10.1007/s00702-013-1111-0

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ferro AM, Brugnolo A, De Leo C, Dessi B, Girtler N, Morbelli S, Nobili F, Rossi DS, Falchero M, Murialdo G, Rossini PM, Babiloni C, Schizzi R, Padolecchia R, Rodriguez G (2005) Stroop interference task and single-photon emission tomography in anorexia: a preliminary report. Int J Eat Disord 38:323–329

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Zysset S, Schroeter ML, Neumann J, von Cramon DY (2007) Stroop interference, hemodynamic response and aging: an event-related fMRI study. Neurobiol Aging 28:937–946. doi:10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2006.05.008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Mohtasib RS, Lumley G, Goodwin JA, Emsley HC, Sluming V, Parkes LM (2012) Calibrated fMRI during a cognitive Stroop task reveals reduced metabolic response with increasing age. Neuroimage 59:1143–1151. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.07.092

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Barbarotto L, Laiacona M, Frosio R, Vecchio M, Farinato A, Capitani E (1998) A normative study on visual reaction times and two Stroop colour-word tests. Ital J Neurol Sci 19:161–170

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Caffarra P, Vezzadini G, Dieci F, Zonato A, Venneri A (2002) Una versione abbreviata del test di stroop: dati normativi nella popolazione italiana. Nuova Rivista di Neurologia 12:111–115

    Google Scholar 

  21. Amato MP, Portaccio E, Goretti B, Zipoli V, Ricchiuti L, De Caro MF, Patti F, Vecchio R, Sorbi S, Trojano M (2006) The Rao’s Brief Repeatable Battery and Stroop Test: normative values with age, education and gender corrections in an Italian population. Mult Scler 12:787–793

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd edn. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale

    Google Scholar 

  23. Champely, S. (2015) pwr: Basic functions for power analysis. R package version 1.1-2. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=pwr

  24. Montgomery SA, Asberg M (1979) A new depression scale designed to be sensitive to change”. Brit J Psychiat134(4): 382–89. doi:10.1192/bjp.134.4.382

  25. Hawley CJ, Gale TM, Sivakumaran T, Hertfordshire Neuroscience Research group (2002) Defining remission by cut off score on the MADRS: selecting the optimal value. J Affect Disord 72:177–184

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Venturini R, Lombardo Radice M, Imperiali MG (1983) I1 “Colour-Word Test” o Test di Stroop. Organizzazioni Speciali, Florence

    Google Scholar 

  27. Spinnler H, Tognoni G (1987) Standardizzazione e Taratura Italiana di Test Neuropsicologici. Ital J Neurol Sci 6:8–21

    Google Scholar 

  28. Akaike H (1973) Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In: Petrov BN, Caski F (eds) Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on Information Theory. Akademiai Kiado, Budapest, pp 267–281

    Google Scholar 

  29. Wagenmakers EJ, Farrell S (2004) AIC model selection using Akaike weights. Psychon Bull Rev 11:192–196

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Bianchi A, Dai Prà M (2008) Twenty years after Spinnler and Tognoni: new instruments in the Italian neuropsychologist’s toolbox. Neurol Sci 29:209–217

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Wilks SS (1941) Determination of sample size for setting tolerance limits. Ann Math Stat 12:91–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Seo EH, Lee DY, Choo IH, Kim SG, Kim KW, Youn JC, Jhoo JH, Woo JI (2008) Normative study of the Stroop Color and Word Test in an educationally diverse elderly population. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 23:1020–1027. doi:10.1002/gps.2027

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Norman MA, Moore DJ, Taylor M, Franklin D Jr, Cysique L, Ake C, Lazarretto D, Vaida F, Heaton RK, the HNRC Group (2011) Demographically corrected norms for African Americans and Caucasians on the Hopkins Verbal learning test-revised, brief visuospatial memory test-revised, Stroop color and word test, and Wisconsin card sorting test 64-card version, 33:793–804. doi:10.1080/13803395.2011.559157

  34. Comalli PE Jr, Wapner S, Werner H (1962) Interference effects of Stroop color-word test in childhood, adulthood, and aging. J Genet Psychol 100:47–53

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Uttl B, Graf P (1997) Color-Word Stroop test performance across the adult life span. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 19:405–420

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Ludwig C, Borella E, Tettamanti M, de Ribaupierre A (2010) Adult age differences in the Color Stroop Test: a comparison between an item-by-item and a blocked version. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 51:135–142. doi:10.1016/j.archger.2009.09.040

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Mohtasib RS, Lumley G, Goodwin JA, Emsley HC, Sluming V, Parkes LM (2012) Calibrated fMRI during a cognitive Stroop task reveals reduced metabolic response with increasing age. Neuroimage 59:1143–1151. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.07.092

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Shukla D, Devi BI, Agrawal A (2011) Outcome measures for traumatic brain injury. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 113:435–441. doi:10.1016/j.clineuro.2011.02.013

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Patti F, Leone C, D’Amico E (2010) Treatment options of cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis. Neurol Sci 31:S265–S269. doi:10.1007/s10072-010-0438-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Brugnolo.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors disclose any actual or potential conflicts of interest including any financial, personal, or other relationship with other people or organizations that could inappropriately influence their work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Brugnolo, A., De Carli, F., Accardo, J. et al. An updated Italian normative dataset for the Stroop color word test (SCWT). Neurol Sci 37, 365–372 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-015-2428-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-015-2428-2

Keywords

Navigation