Validation of a simple method for atrial fibrillation screening in patients with stroke
- 261 Downloads
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia in adult and old people and represents a risk factor for stroke. Correct AF individuation bears strong relevance in primary and secondary stroke prevention. Our goal was to evaluate the reliability of a low-cost, non-invasive technology in detecting AF in acute stroke patients. AFib model BP3MQ1-2D (Microlife USA, Dunedin, FL) showed good accuracy in diagnosing AF in a general cardiologic outpatient population. We carried out an observational study in patients with recent stroke. We studied 207 subjects, 103 men, 104 women, mean age (±SD) 77.7 ± 11.34 years, who underwent a test by AFib device with indication of AF or lack of it. The golden standard was a 12-lead EKG done immediately and evaluated by a certified cardiologist. We computed estimates of Sensitivity and Specificity and their 95 % confidence intervals (CI). AF was present in 38 subjects from the sample of 207 (18.4 %). AFib correctly demonstrated AF in 34 and failed diagnosing AF in 4 cases; on the other hand, AFib correctly excluded AF in 167 and caused an erroneous diagnosis of AF in 2 cases. The Sensitivity was 0.895 (95 % CI 0.7597–0.958) and the Specificity was 0.988 (95 % CI 0.958–0.997). The AFib device global accuracy was 0.971 (95 % CI 0.938–0.987). This device was able to detect AF with high specificity and a good sensitivity. This device may be considered as an accurate tool in detecting AF in stroke patients.
KeywordsAFib device Atrial fibrillation Stroke Specificity Sensitivity Accuracy
We thank the following components of the nursing team of our Stroke Unit who performed all evaluations by means of AFib device as well as the 12-lead-standard EKG recordings: Mr. Franco Bixio, Mrs. Paola Bruzzone, Mrs. Antonella Cuomo, Mrs. Cristina Forgione and the Head Nurse Mrs. Adria Ferrari. We also thank the Italian Association against Stroke (A.L.I.Ce.: “Associazione Lotta all’Ictus Cerebrale”) that provided free of charge, three AFib Microlife devices to perform the study.
Conflict of interest
- 2.Go A, Hylek E, Phillips K, Chang Y, Henault L, Selby J, Singer D (2001) Prevalence of diagnosed atrial fibrillation in adults: national implications for rhythm management and stroke prevention: the Anticoagulation and Risk Factors In Atrial Fibrillation (ATRIA) Study. JAMA 285:2370–2375CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 4.Kimura K, Minematsu K, Yamaguchi T, Japan Multicenter Stroke Investigators’ Collaboration (J-MUSIC) (2005) Atrial fibrillation as a predictive factor for severe stroke and early death in 15,831 patients with acute ischaemic stroke. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 76:679–683PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 6.Gandolfo C, Balestrino M, Burrone A, Del Sette M, Finocchi C (2008) Stroke due to atrial fibrillation and the attitude to prescribing anticoagulant prevention in Italy. A prospective study of a consecutive stroke population admitted to a comprehensive stroke unit. J Neurol 255:796–802CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 7.Furie KL, Goldstein LB, Albers GW, Khatri P, Neyens R, Turakhia MP, Turan TN, Wood KA, American Heart Association Stroke Council, Council on Quality of Care and Outcomes Research, Council on Cardiovascular Nursing, Council on Clinical Cardiology, Council on Peripheral Vascular Disease (2012) Oral antithrombotic agents for the prevention of stroke in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: a science advisory for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke 43:3442–3453CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 8.Camm AJ, Lip GY, De Caterina R, Savelieva I, Atar D, Hohnloser SH, Hindricks G, Kirchhof P, ESC Committee for Practice Guidelines-CPG (2012) 2012 focused update of the ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation: an update of the 2010 ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation—developed with the special contribution of the European Heart Rhythm Association. Europace 14:1385–1413CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 9.Connolly SJ, Ezekowitz MD, Yusuf S, Eikelboom J, Oldgren J, Parekh A, Pogue J, Reilly PA, Themeles E, Varrone J, Wang S, Alings M, Xavier D, Zhu J, Diaz R, Lewis BS, Darius H, Diener HC, Joyner CD, Wallentin L (2009) Dabigatran versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 361:1139–1151CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 10.Patel MR, Mahaffey KW, Garg J, Pan G, Singer DE, Hacke W, Breithardt G, Halperin JL, Hankey GJ, Piccini JP, Becker RC, Nessel CC, Paolini JF, Berkowitz SD, Fox KA, Califf RM, ROCKET AF Investigators (2011) Rivaroxaban versus warfarin in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 365:883–891CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 11.Granger CB, Alexander JH, McMurray JJ, Lopes RD, Hylek EM, Hanna M, Al-Khalidi HR, Ansell J, Atar D, Avezum A, Bahit MC, Diaz R, Easton JD, Ezekowitz JA, Flaker G, Garcia D, Geraldes M, Gersh BJ, Golitsyn S, Goto S, Hermosillo AG, Hohnloser SH, Horowitz J, Mohan P, Jansky P, Lewis BS, Lopez-Sendon JL, Pais P, Parkhomenko A, Verheugt FW, Zhu J, Wallentin L (2011) Apixaban versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 365:981–992CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 16.Armitage P, Berry G (1998) Statistical methods in medical research, 3rd edn. Blackwell, LondonGoogle Scholar
- 23.Suzuki S, Sagara K, Otsuka T, Kano H, Matsuno S, Takai H, Uejima T, Oikawa Y, Koike A, Nagashima K, Kirigaya H, Yajima J, Tanabe H, Sawada H, Aizawa T, Yamashita T (2013) Usefulness of frequent supraventricular extrasystoles and a high CHADS2 score to predict first-time appearance of atrial fibrillation. Am J Cardiol 111:1602–1607CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar