Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Computer protocol for the electrodiagnostic evaluation of patients with suspected median neuropathy at the wrist

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neurological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Patients with median entrapment neuropathy at the wrist (MEW) present a large burden to electrodiagnostic (EDx) services. We report here our experience with a computer protocol for EDx standardized evaluation of these patients. The computer program guiding the examiners through the history, focused clinical examination and nerve conduction studies (NCSs), and automatically generating the report was employed in patients with suspected MEW referred to our unit in year 2010. Included were 1,935 patients (3,870 hands) with suspected MEW. Median motor study had to be performed in 100 %, a ring finger sensory comparison study in 99 %, a thumb study in 23 %, wrist study in 3 % and a middle finger study in 19 % of hands with cumulative sensitivities of 45, 68, 73, 74, and 82 %, respectively. In conclusion, our computer program helped to relieve some burden, standardized NCSs and provided data needed to further develop evidence-based protocol for the NCSs in patients with suspected MEW.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Atroshi I, Gummesson C, Johnsson R, Ornstein E, Ranstam J, Rosen I (1999) Prevalence of carpal tunnel syndrome in a general population. JAMA 282:153–158

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. AAN (1993) Practice parameter for carpal tunnel syndrome (summary statement). Report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology 43:2406–2409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Katz JN, Simmons BP (2002) Clinical practice. Carpal tunnel syndrome. N Engl J Med 346:1807–1812

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gomes I, Becker J, Arthur Ehlers J, Bocchese Nora D (2006) Prediction of the neurophysiological diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome from the demographic and clinical data. Clin Neurophysiol 117:964–971

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Pryse-Phillips WE (1984) Validation of a diagnostic sign in carpal tunnel syndrome. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 47:870–872

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Rempel D, Evanoff B, Amadio PC, de Krom M, Franklin G, Franzblau A, Gray R, Gerr F, Hagberg M, Hales T, Katz JN, Pransky G (1998) Consensus criteria for the classification of carpal tunnel syndrome in epidemiologic studies. Am J Public Health 88:1447–1451

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Werner RA, Andary M (2011) Electrodiagnostic evaluation of carpal tunnel syndrome. Muscle Nerve 44:597–607

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Sheu JJ, Yuan RY, Chiou HY, Hu CJ, Chen WT (2006) Segmental study of the median nerve versus comparative tests in the diagnosis of mild carpal tunnel syndrome. Clin Neurophysiol 117:1249–1255

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Jablecki CK, Andary MT, Floeter MK, Miller RG, Quartly CA, Vennix MJ, Wilson JR (2002) Practice parameter: electrodiagnostic studies in carpal tunnel syndrome. Report of the American Association of Electrodiagnostic Medicine, American Academy of Neurology, and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. Neurology 58:1589–1592

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Robinson LR, Micklesen PJ, Wang L (1998) Strategies for analyzing nerve conduction data: superiority of a summary index over single tests. Muscle Nerve 21:1166–1171

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Robinson LR, Micklesen PJ, Wang L (2000) Optimizing the number of tests for carpal tunnel syndrome. Muscle Nerve 23:1880–1882

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Sunderland S (1978) Nerves and nerve injuries. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, pp 1–1046

    Google Scholar 

  13. Stewart JD (2010) Median nerve. Focal peripheral neuropathies, vol 1, 4th edn. JBJ Publishing, West Vancouver, pp 194–259

    Google Scholar 

  14. Rigler I, Podnar S (2007) Short screening questionnaire for patients with carpal tunnel syndrome. Zdrav Vestn 78:73–78

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Dr. Dianne Jones for language review. The study was supported by the Republic of Slovenia Research Agency, Grant No. P3-0338.

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Simon Podnar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Podnar, S., Grgič, M. Computer protocol for the electrodiagnostic evaluation of patients with suspected median neuropathy at the wrist. Neurol Sci 34, 2211–2218 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-013-1457-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-013-1457-y

Keywords

Navigation