Neurological Sciences

, Volume 34, Issue 2, pp 157–164 | Cite as

Effects of long-term electromagnetic field exposure on spatial learning and memory in rats

  • Dongmei HaoEmail author
  • Lei Yang
  • Su Chen
  • Jun Tong
  • Yonghao Tian
  • Benhang Su
  • Shuicai Wu
  • Yanjun ZengEmail author
Original Article


With the development of communications industry, mobile phone plays an important role in daily life. Whether or not the electromagnetic radiation emitted by mobile phone causes any adverse effects on brain function has become of a great concern. This paper investigated the effect of electromagnetic field on spatial learning and memory in rats. 32 trained Wistar rats were divided into two groups: exposure group and control group. The exposure group was exposed to 916 MHz, 10w/m2 mobile phone electromagnetic field (EMF) 6 h a day, 5 days a week, 10 weeks. The completion time, number of total errors and the neuron discharge signals were recorded while the rats were searching for food in an eight-arm radial maze at every weekend. The neuron signals of one exposed rat and one control rat in the maze were obtained by the implanted microelectrode arrays in their hippocampal regions. It can be seen that during the weeks 4–5 of the experiment, the average completion time and error rate of the exposure group were longer and larger than that of control group (p < 0.05). During the weeks 1–3 and 6–9, they were close to each other. The hippocampal neurons showed irregular firing patterns and more spikes with shorter interspike interval during the whole experiment period. It indicates that the 916 MHz EMF influence learning and memory in rats to some extent in a period during exposure, and the rats can adapt to long-term EMF exposure.


Electromagnetic field Wistar rats Eight-arm radial maze Hippocampal neuron 



We would like to thank Mr. Nicolas Moncel from Ecole Centrale d’Electronique (ECE) Paris for its revision. This work was funded by the National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program), No. 2011CB503700/2011CB503702, the National Natural Science Foundation of China, No. 81071231 and 30670543, Research Program of Beijing Municipal Education Commission, No.KM200910005016 and Fundamental Research Fund for the Beijing Municipal Education Commission Science and Technology Innovation Platform No. JX015999201001.

Conflicts of interest

None declared.


  1. 1.
    Seitz H, Stinner D, Eikmanna Th et al (2005) Electromagnetichypersensitivity (EHS) and subjective health complaints associated with electromagnetic fields of mobile phone communication-a literature review published between 2000 and 2004. SCI TOTAL E 349:45–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Huber R, Treyer V, Schuderer J et al (2005) Exposure to pulse-modulated radio frequency electromagnetic fields affects regional cerebral blood flow. Eur J Neurosci 21:1000–1006PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ferreri F, Curcio G, Pasqualetti P et al (2006) Mobile Phone Emissions and Human Brain Excitability. Ann Neurol 60(2):188–196PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Satomi IT, Shingo O, Noritoshi A (2007) Effects of High Frequency Electromagnetic Field (EMF) Emitted by Mobile Phones on the Human Motor Cortex. BIOELECTROM 28:553–561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Volkow ND, Tomasi D, Wang G-J et al (2011) Effects of Cell Phone Radiofrequency Signal Exposure on Brain Glucose Metabolism. JAMA 305(8):808–813PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kwon MS, Hämäläinen H (2011) Effects of mobile phone electromagnetic fields: critical evaluation of behavioral and neurophysiological studies. Bioelectromagnetics 32:253–272PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Valentini E, Ferrara M, Presaghi F et al (2010) Systematic review and meta-analysis of psychomotor effects of mobile phone electromagnetic fields. Occup Environ Med 67:708–716PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Valentini E, Curcio G, Moroni F et al (2007) Neurophysiological effects of mobile phone electromagnetic fields on humans: acomprehensive review. Bioelectromagnetics 28:415–432PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Maaroufi K, Had-Aissouni L, Melon C et al (2009) Effects of prolonged iron overload and low frequency electromagnetic exposure on spatial learning and memory in the young rat. Neurobiol Learn Mem 92(3):345–355PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cosquer B, Kuster N, Cassel JC (2005) Whole-body exposure to 2.45 GHz electromagnetic fields does not alter 12-arm radial-maze with reduced access to spatial cues in rats. Behav Brain Res 161(2):331–334PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Coskun O, Naziroglu M, Comlekci S et al (2011) Effects of 50 Hertz-1 mT magnetic field on action potential in isolated rat sciatic nerve. Toxicol Ind Health 27(2):127–132PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    de Gannes FP, Billaudel B, Taxile M et al (2009) Effects of Head-Only Exposure of Rats to GSM-900 on Blood-Brain Barrier Permeability and Neuronal Degeneration. Radiat Res 172(3):359–367PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Masuda H, Ushiyama A, Takahashi M et al (2009) Effects of 915 mhz electromagnetic-field radiation in TEM Cell on the blood–brain barrier and neurons in the rat brain. Radiat Res 172(1):66–73PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Eberhardt JL,Persson BRR, Brun AE et al (2008) Blood–brain barrier permeability and nerve cell damage in rat brain 14 and 28 days after exposure to microwaves from GSM mobile phones. Electromagn Biol Med 27(3):215–229PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bas O, Odaci E, Kaplan S et al (2009) 900 MHz electromagnetic field exposure affects qualitative and quantitative features of hippocampal pyramidal cells in the adult female rat. Brain Res 1265:178–185PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bas O, Odaci E, Mollaoglu H et al (2009) Chronic prenatal exposure to the 900 megahertz electromagnetic field induces pyramidal cell loss in the hippocampus of newborn rats. Toxicol Ind Health 25(6):377–384PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Grafstrom G, Nittby H, Brun A et al (2008) Histopathological examinations of rat brains after long-term exposure to GSM-900 mobile phone radiation. Brain Res Bull 77(5):257–263PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ammari M, Jeljeli M, Maaroufi K et al (2008) Static magnetic field exposure affects behavior and learning in rats. Electromagn Biol Med 27(2):185–196PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zhu Y, Gao F, Yang X et al (2008) The effect of microwave emission from mobile phones on neuron survival in rat central nervous system. Prog. Electromagn. Res. 82:287–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Cosquer B, Kuster N, Cassel JC (2005) Whole-body exposure to 2.45 GHz electromagnetic fields does not alter 12-arm radial-maze with reduced access to spatial cues in rats. Behav Brain Res 161(2):331–334PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ammari M, Jacquet A, Lecomte A et al (2008) Effect of head-only sub-chronic and chronic exposure to 900-MHz GSM electromagnetic fields on spatial memory in rats. Brain Inj 22(13–14):1021–1029PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Jadidi M, Firoozabadi SM, Rashidy-Pour A et al (2009) Does whole body exposure to GSM-950 MHz electromagnetic fields affect acquisition and consolidation of spatial information in rats? Iran J Radiat Res 7(1):57–62Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Grafstrom G, Nittby H, Brun A et al (2008) Histopathological examinations of rat brains after long-term exposure to GSM-900 mobile phone radiation. Brain Res Bull 77(5):257–263PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Daniels WMU, Pitout IL, Afullo TJO, Mabandla MV (2009) The effect of electromagnetic radiation in the mobile phone range on the behaviour of the rat. Metab Brain Dis 24:629–641PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kumlin T, Iivonen H, Miettinen P et al (2007) Mobile phone radiation and the developing brain: Behavioral and morphological effects in juvenile rats. Radiat Res 168(4):471–479PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Arendash GW, Sanchez-Ramos J, Mori T et al (2010) Electromagnetic field treatment protects against and reverses cognitive impairment in Alzheimer’s disease mice. J Alzheimer’s Dis 19:191–210Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Dragicevic N, Bradshaw PC, Mamcarz M et al (2011) Long-term electromagnetic field treatment enhances brain mitochondrial function of both Alzheimer’s transgenic mice and normal mice: a mechanism for electromagnetic field-induced cognitive benefit? Neuroscience 185:135–149PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Goonawardena AV, Robinson L, Hampson RE, Riedel G (2010) Cannabinoid and cholinergic systems interact during performance of a short-term memory task in the rat. LEARN MEM. 17:502–511PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Saito S, Okada A, Ouwa T et al (2010) Interaction between Hippocampal gamma-Aminobutyric Acid(A) and N-Methyl-d-aspartate Receptors in the Retention of Spatial Working Memory in Rats. Biol Pharm Bull 33:439–443PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Klur S, Muller C, Pereira de Vasconcelos A, Ballard T, Lopez J, Galani R, Certa U, Cassel JC (2009) Hippocampal-dependent spatial memory functions might be lateralized in rats: an approach combining gene expression profiling and reversible inactivation. HIPPOCAMPUS. 19:800–816PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Narayanan SN, Kumar RS, Potu BK et al (2010) Effect of radio-frequency electromagnetic radiations (RF-EMR) on passive avoidance behavior and haippocampal morphology in Wistar rats. Ups J Med Sci 115(2):91–96PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Martin SJ, Clark RE (2007) The rodent hippocampus and spatial memory: from synapses to systems. Cell Mol Life Sci 64(4):401–431PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Life Science and BioengineeringBeijing University of TechnologyBeijingChina
  2. 2.College of Biomedical EngineeringSouth-Central University for NationalitiesWuhanChina

Personalised recommendations