Abstract
Reports on the use of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (INM) techniques during surgery for Chiari malformations are anecdotal. There are almost no data on significant intraoperative worsening in either somatosensory-evoked potentials (SEPs) or brainstem auditory-evoked potentials (BAEPs) during surgery that would have alerted the surgeon to modify the surgical strategy. Yet, a few reports suggest that INM may play a role in preventing spinal cord injury during positioning of the patient. Overall, the use of INM in this type of surgery can be considered only as an option. More speculatively, INM adds information to the ongoing discussion on the most appropriate surgical technique for posterior fossa decompression in Chiari malformations. This debate applies especially to children where a more conservative approach is advisable to reduce the complications. Studies on the conduction time of BAEPs provide some evidence that, from a merely neurophysiological perspective, most of the improvement occurs after bony decompression and removal of the dural band at the level of the atlanto-occipital membrane, not after duraplasty.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Epstein NE, Danto J, Nardi D (1993) Evaluation of intraoperative somatosensory-evoked potential monitoring during 100 cervical operations. Spine 18(6):737–747
Deinsberger W, Christophis P, Jödicke A, Heesen M, Böker DK (1998) Somatosensory evoked potential monitoring during positioning of the patient for posterior fossa surgery in the semisitting position. Neurosurgery 43(1):36–40 (discussion 40–2)
Kombos T, Suess O, Da Silva C, Ciklatekerlio O, Nobis V, Brock M (2003) Impact of somatosensory evoked potential monitoring on cervical surgery. J Clin Neurophysiol 20(2):122–128
Schwartz DM, Sestokas AK, Hilibrand AS, Vaccaro AR, Bose B, Li M, Albert TJ (2006) Neurophysiological identification of position-induced neurologic injury during anterior cervical spine surgery. J Clint Monit Comput 20(6):437–444
Navarro R, Olavarria G, Seshadri R, Gonzales-Portillo G, Mc Lone DG, Tomita T (2004) Surgical results of posterior fossa decompression for patients with Chiari I malformation. Child’s Nerv Syst 20:349–356
Durham S, Fjeld-Olenec K (2008) Comparison of posterior fossa decompression with and without duraplasty for the surgical treatment of Chiari malformation Type I in pediatric patients: a meta-analysis. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2:42–49
Costa P, Bruno A, Bonzanino M, Massaro F, Caruso L, Vincenzo I, Ciaramitaro P, Montalenti E (2007) Somatosensory- and motor-evoked potential monitoring during spine and spinal cord surgery. Spinal Cord 45:86–91
Anderson RC, Emerson RG, Dowling KC, Feldstein NA (2001) Attenuation of somatosensory evoked potentials during positioning in a patient undergoing suboccipital craniectomy for Chiari I malformation with syringomyelia. J Child Neurol 16(12):936–939
Danto J, Milhorat T, Hertzberg H, Bolognese P, Conlon J, Korn A (2006) The neurophysiological intraoperative monitoring of Chiari malformation surgery. Rivista Medica 12(1–2):51–54
Loder RT, Thomson GJ, LaMont RL (1991) Spinal cord monitoring in patients with nonidiopathic spinal deformities using somatosensory evoked potentials. Spine 16(12):1359–1364
Isu T, Sasaki H, Takamura H, Kobayashi N (1993) Foramen magnum decompression with removal of the outer layer of the dura as treatment for syringomyelia occurring with Chiari I malformation. Neurosurgery 33:845–849
Caldarelli M, Novegno F, Massimi L, Romani R, Tamburrini G, Di Rocco C (2007) The role of limited posterior fossa craniectomy in the surgical treatment of Chiari malformation type I: experience with a pediatric series. J Neurosurg 106:187–195
Anderson RCE, Emerson RG, Dowling KC, Feldstein NA (2003) Improvement in brainstem auditory evoked potentials after suboccipital decompression in patients with Chiari I malformations. J Neurosurg 98:459–464
Anderson RCE, Dowling KC, Feldstein NA, Emerson RG (2003) Chiari I malformation: potential role for intraoperative electrophysiologic monitoring. J Clin Neurophysiol 20(1):65–72
Zamel K, Galloway G, Kosnik EJ, Raslan M, Adeli A (2009) Intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring in 80 patients with Chiari I malformation: role of duraplasty. J Clin Neurophysiol 26(2):70–75
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that there is no actual or potential conflict of interest in relation to this article.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sala, F., Squintani, G., Tramontano, V. et al. Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring during surgery for Chiari malformations. Neurol Sci 32 (Suppl 3), 317–319 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-011-0688-z
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-011-0688-z