Skip to main content
Log in

Motion analysis in cervical dystonia

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neurological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate kinematic features in cervical dystonia (CD) patients by means of a motion analysis system (Fastrack-Polhemus, Colchester VT, USA).

Design

Small study sample.

Setting

Ambulatory care.

Patients and participants

15 CD patients and 10 healthy subjects.

Interventions

Not applicable.

Measurements and results

Posture at rest and voluntary movements in both groups. Posture at rest in CD patients was impaired in all planes; only 20% of the patients exhibited complex dystonic patterns at clinical evaluation, whereas more than 90% of them had complex ones at kinematic evaluation. The analysis of voluntary motion revealed a reduced range of voluntary excursion and increased execution time; the impairment was higher when the patients moved their heads towards the anti-dystonic side.

Conclusions

Fastrack system is a sensitive tool in kinematic evaluation of CD, as it provides useful quantitative information on rest position and on motion in CD patients and may consequently improve the management of this disease.

Sommario

Obiettivo di questo studio è la valutazione cinematica di pazienti affetti da distonia cervicale mediante un sistema computerizzato di analisi del movimento (Fastrack-Polhemus, Colchester VT, USA). Abbiamo reclutato 15 pazienti affetti da distonia cervicale; i dati ricavati dai pazienti sono stati confrontati con quelli di 10 soggetti sani. In entrambi i gruppi sono stati confrontati la postura a riposo e l’attività motoria volontaria. Nei pazienti con distonia cervicale la postura a riposo risultava alterata in tutti i piani analizzati; mentre con la valutazione clinica si evidenziavano pattern distonici complessi solo nel 20% dei pazienti, con l’analisi cinematica questi erano presenti nel 90% dei casi. Dall’analisi del movimento volontario sono emersi una riduzione dell’escursione del movimento ed un incremento del tempo di esecuzione del movimento stesso; tale compromissione era maggiore se il paziente muoveva la testa in direzione opposta a quella della postura distonica. In conclusione, il nostro sistema di analisi cinematica costituisce uno strumento sensibile per la valutazione dei pazienti affetti da distonia cervicale, sia per quanto concerne la postura a riposo che l’attività motoria volontaria; esso può fornire informazioni utili anche nella gestione terapeutica di tali pazienti.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chan J, Brin MF, Fahn S (1996) Idiopathic cervical dystonia: clinical characteristic. Mov Disord 6:119–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Dauer WT, Burke RE, Greene P et al (1998) Current concepts on the clinical features, aetiology and management of idiopathic cervical dystonia. Brain 121:547–560

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Stacy M (2000) Idiopathic cervical dystonia: an overview. Neurology 55[Suppl]:S2–S8

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Camfield L, Ben-Shlomo Y, Warner TT (2002) Epidemiological Study of Dystonia in Europe Collaborative Group. Impact of cervical dystonia on quality of life. Mov Disord 17:838–841

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Currà A, Berardelli A, Agostino R et al (2000) Movement cueing and motor execution in patients with dystonia: a kinematic study. Mov Disord 15:103–112

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Buccolieri A, Avanzino L, Marinelli L et al (2004) Muscle relaxation is impaired in dystonia: a reaction time study. Mov Disord 19:681–687

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Rothwell JC, Obeso JA, Day BL et al (1983) Pathophysiology of dystonias. Adv Neurol 39:851–863

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Berardelli A, Rothwell JC, Day BL et al (1985) Pathophysiology of blepharospasm and oromandibular dystonia. Brain 108:593–608

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Nakashima K, Rothwell JC, Day BL et al (1989) Reciprocal inhibition between forearm muscle in patients with writer’s cramp and other occupational cramps, symptomatic hemidystonia and hemiparesis due to stroke. Brain 112:681–697

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Marsden CD, Sheehy MP (1990) Writer’s cramp. Trend Neurosci 13:148–153

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Rutledge JN, Hilal SK, Silver AJ et al (1988) Magnetic resonance imaging of dystonic state. Adv Neurol 50:265–275

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Vitek JL (2002) Pathophysiology of dystonia: a neuronal model. Mov Disord 17[Suppl 3]:S49–S62

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Berardelli A, Rothwell JC, Hallett M et al (1998) The pathophysiology of primary dystonia. Brain 121:1195–1212

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Carpaneto J, Micera S, Galardi G et al (2004) A protocol for the assessment of 3D movements of the head in persons with cervical dystonia. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 19:659–663

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ferrario VF, Sforza C, Serrao G et al (2002) Active range of motion of the head and cervical spine: a three-dimensional investigation in healthy young adults. J Orthop Res 20:122–129

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Gregori B, Agostino R, Bologna M et al (2008) Fast voluntary neck movements in patients with cervical dystonia: a kinematic study before and after therapy with botulinum toxin type A. Clin Neurophysiol 119:273–280

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Sforza C, Grassi GP, Fragnito N et al (2002) Three-dimensional analysis of active head and cervical spine range of motion: effect of age in healthy male subjects. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 17:611–614

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Feipel V, Rondelet B, Le Pallec JP et al (1999) Normal global motion of the cervical spine: an electrogoniometric study. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 14:462–470

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Salvia P, Champagne O, Feipel V et al (2006) Clinical and goniometric evaluation of patients with spasmodic torticollis. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 21:323–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Galardi G, Micera S, Carpaneto J et al (2003) Automated assessment of cervical dystonia. Mov Disord 18:1358–1367

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Consky E, Basinski A, Belle L et al (1990) The Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS). Neurology 40[Suppl 1]:445

    Google Scholar 

  22. Crawford NR, Yamaguchi GT, Dickman CA (1999) A new technique for determining 3-d joint angles: the tilt/twist method. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 14:153–165

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Sabatini AM (2002) Identification of neuromuscular synergies in natural upper-arm movements. Biol Cybern 86:253–262

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Jordan K, Dziedzic K, Jones PW et al (2000) The reliability of the three-dimensional fastrak measurement system in measuring cervical spine and shoulder range of motion in healthy subjects. Rheumatology 39:382–388

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Castro WHM, Sautmann A, Schilgen M et al (2000) Noninvasive three-dimensional analysis of cervical spine motion in normal subjects in relation to age and sex. Spine 25:443–449

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Chen J, Solinger AB, Poncet JF et al (1999) Meta-analysis of normative cervical motion. Spine 24:1571–1578

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Tarsy D (1997) Comparison of clinical rating scales in treatment of cervical dystonia with botulinum toxin. Mov Disord 12:100–102

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Comella CL, Stebbins GT, Goetz CG et al (1997) Teaching tape for the motor section of the Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Scale. Mov Disord 12:570–575

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Tsui JK, Eisen A, Stoessl AJ et al (1986) Double-blind study of botulinum toxin in spasmodic torticollis. Lancet 2:245–247

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Carbon M, Su S, Dhawan V et al (2004) Regional metabolism in primary torsion dystonia: effects of penetrance and genotype. Neurology 62:1384–1390

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Trott PH, Pearcy MJ, Ruston SA et al (1996) Three-dimensional analysis of active cervical motion: the effect of age and gender. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 11:201–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Vasavada AN, Peterson BW, Delp SL (2002) Three-dimensional spatial tuning of neck muscle activation in humans. Exp Brain Res 147:437–448

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giuseppe Galardi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Boccagni, C., Carpaneto, J., Micera, S. et al. Motion analysis in cervical dystonia. Neurol Sci 29, 375–381 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-008-1033-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-008-1033-z

Keywords

Navigation