Skip to main content
Log in

Ethical questions in the treatment of subjects with dementia. Part I. Respecting autonomy: awareness, competence and behavioural disorders

  • Sin Document
  • Published:
Neurological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The document deals with some ethical issues raised by the treatment of demented people. In particular the conceptual and empirical aspects of the assessment of awareness and competence of these patients are analysed, as well as the dilemmas related to the treatment of behavioral disorders.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Bibliografia

  1. Aalten P, Van Valen E, Clare L et al (2005) Awareness in dementia: in the eye of the beholder. Aging Mental Health 9:414–422

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Barrett AM, Eslinger PJ, Ballentine NH, Heilman KM (2005) Unawareness of cognitive deficit (cognitive anosognosia) in probable AD and control subjects. Neurology 64:693–699

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Lope OL, Becker JT, Somsak D et al (1994) Awareness of cognitive deficits and anosognosia in probable Alzheimer’s disease. Eur Neurol 34:277–282.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dalla Barba G, Parlato V, Lavarone A, Boller F (1995) Anosognosia, intrusions and ‘frontal’ functions in Alzheimer’s disease and depression. Neuropsychologia 33:247–259

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Starkstein SE, Sabe L, Chemerinski E et al (1996) Two domains of anosognosia in Alzheimer’s disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 61:485–490

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Starkstein SE, Mizrahi R (2006) Depression in Alzheimer’s disease. Exp Rev Neurother 6:887–895

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Migliorelli R, Teson A, Sabe L et al (1995) Anosognosia in Alzheimer’s disease: a study of associated factors. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci 7:338–344

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Markova IS, Berrios GE (1995) Insight in clinical psychiatry revisited. Compr Psychiatry 36:367–376

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ott BR, Fogel BS (1992) Measurement of depression in dementia: self vs clinician rating. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 7:899–904

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Fritsh T, McClendon MJ, Smyth KA, Ogrocki PK (2002) Effects of educational attainment and occupational status on cognitive and functional decline in persons with Alzheimertype dementia. Int Psychogeriatr 14:347–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. McDaniel KD, Edland SD, Heyman A (1995) Relationship between level of insight and severity of dementia in Alzheimer disease. CERAD Clinical Investigators. Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer’s Disease. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord 9:101–104

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Zanetti O, Vallotti B, Frisoni GB et al (1999) Insight in dementia: when does it occur? Evidence for a nonlinear relationship between insight and cognitive status. J Gerontol Psychol Sci 54:100–106

    Google Scholar 

  13. Harwood DG, Sultzer DL, Wheatley MV (2000) Impaired insight in Alzheimer disease: association with cognitive deficits, psychiatric symptoms, and behavioral disturbances. Neuropsychiatry Neuropsychol Behav Neurol 13:82–88

    Google Scholar 

  14. Derouesné C, Thibault S, Lagha-Pierucci S et al (1999) Decreased awareness of cognitive deficits in patients with mild dementia of the Alzheimer type. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 14:1019–1030

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ott BR, Laflèche G, Whelihan WM et al (1996) Impaired awareness of deficits in Alzheimer disease. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord 10:68–76

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Mega MS, Lee L, Dinov I et al (2000) Cerebral correlates of psychotic symptoms in Alzheimer’s disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 69:167–171

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Petersen RC, Smith GE, Waring SC et al (1997) Aging, memory, and mild cognitive impairment. Int Psychogeriatr 9:65–69

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kalbe E, Salmon E, Perani D et al (2005) Anosognosia in very mild Alzheimer’s disease but not in mild cognitive impairment. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 19:349–356

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Vogel A, Stokholm J, Gade A et al (2004) Awareness of deficits in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease: Do MCI patients have impaired insight? Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 17:181–187

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Mental Capacity Act (2005) www.opsi.gov.uk/-acts/acts2005/20050009.htm

  21. Wong JG, Clare CH, Gunn Ng, Holland AJ (1999) Capacity to make health care decisions: its importance in clinical practice. Psychol Med 29:437–446

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Beauchamp TL, Childress JF (2001) Principles of biomedical ethics, 5th edn. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  23. Appelbaum PS, Grisso T (1988) Assessing patients’ capacities to consent to treatment. N Engl J Med 319:163–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Karlawish JH, Casarett DJ, James BD et al (2005) The ability of persons with Alzheimer disease to make a decision about taking a AD treatment. Neurol 64:1514–1519

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Marson D, Cody HA, Ingram KK, Harrell LE (1995) Neuropsychological predictors of competency in Alzheimer’s disease using a rational reasons legal standard. Arch Neurol 52:955–959

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Marson D, Chatterjee A, Ingram KK, Harrell LE (1996) Toward a neurologic model of competency: cognitive predictors of capacity to consent in Alzheimer’s disease using three different legal standards. Neurology 46:666–672

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Cairns R, Maddock C, Buchanan A et al (2005). Prevalence and predictors of mental incapacity in psychiatric in-patients. Br J Psych 187:379–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Pucci E, Belardinelli N, Borsetti G et al (2001) Information and competency for consent to pharmacological trials in Alzheimer disease: an empirical analysis in patients and family caregivers. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord 15:146–154

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Stewart R (2006) Mental health legislation and decision making capacity. Autonomy in Alzheimer’s disease is ignored and neglected. BMJ 332:118–119

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Etchells E, Darzins P, Silberfeld M et al (1999) Assessment of patient capacity to consent to treatment. J Gen Intern Med 14:27–34

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Marson DC, Earnst KS, Jamil F et al (2000) Consistency of physicians’ legal standard and personal judgments of competency in patients with Alzheimer’s disease. J Am Geriatr Soc 48:911–918

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Vellinga A, Smit JH, van Leeuwen E et al (2005) Decision-making capacity of elderly patients assessed through the vignette method: Imagination or reality? Aging and Mental Health 9:40–48

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Grisso T, Appelbaum PS, Hill-Fotouhi C (1997) The MacCAT-T: a clinical tool to assess patients’ capacities to make treatment decisions. Psychiatr Serv 48:1415–1419

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Brock D, Buchanan A (1989) Deciding for others: the ethics of surrogate decision-making. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  35. Ditto PH, Danks JH, Smucker WD et al (2001) Advance directives as acts of communication. Arch Intern Med 161:421–430

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Emanuel EJ, Emanuel LL (1992) Proxy decision making for incompetent patients. JAMA 267:2067–2071

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Hereinafter “Oviedo Convention”: http://conventions.coe.int/-Treaty/ita/Treaties/Html/164.htm

  38. Defanti CA (2004) In Voltz R, Bernat JL, Borasio GD et al (eds) Palliative care in neurology. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  39. Caltagirone C, Bianchetti A, Trabucchi M et al; Italian Association of Psychogeriatrics (2005) Guidelines for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease from the Italian Association of Psychogeriatrics. Drug Aging 22[Suppl 1]:26

  40. — (2006) Recommendations on how to improve the legal rights and protection of adults with incapacity due to dementia. http://www.alzheimer-europe.org/?lm2=6A55EAF2CD2F#

  41. Post SG (2000) The moral challenge of Alzheimer disease, 2nd edn. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD

    Google Scholar 

  42. Jones M (2005) GentleCare. Carocci Faber Ed, Roma

    Google Scholar 

  43. Valla P (ed) (2002) Alzheimer. Architetture e Giardini come Strumento Terapeutico. Angelo Guerini Ed, Milan

  44. Cannara A, Brizioli C, Brizioli E (2004) Progettare l’ambiente per l’Alzheimer. Specifiche progettuali per l’ambiente terapeutico. FrancoAngeli Ed, Milan

    Google Scholar 

  45. Lee PE, Gill SS, Freedman M et al (2004) Atypical antipsychotic drugs in the treatment of behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia: a systematic review. BMJ 329:75–79

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Tannsjö T (2004) The Convention on Human rights and Biomedicine and the Use of Coercion in Psychiatry. Journal of Med Ethics 30:430–434

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. A. Defanti.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Defanti, C.A., Tiezzi, A., Gasparini, M. et al. Ethical questions in the treatment of subjects with dementia. Part I. Respecting autonomy: awareness, competence and behavioural disorders. Neurol Sci 28, 216–231 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-006-0825-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-006-0825-x

Key Words

Navigation