Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparison of sensitivities of macro EMG and concentric needle EMG in L4 radiculopathy

  • ORIGINAL
  • Published:
Neurological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract.

The purpose of this study was to compare the sensitivities of macro EMG (mEMG) and concentric needle EMG (cnEMG) in showing abnormality in L4 radiculopathy. We evaluated 23 patients with clinically and radiologically proven L4 root lesions. Among these patients, 21 (92%) had cnEMG abnormalities. Out of 21 patients with cnEMG abnormality, 3 (14%) had fibrillations and positive sharp waves, 8 (38%) had interference pattern abnormality and all of them had motor unit potential (MUP) abnormality on quantitative MUP analysis. Seventeen patients (74%) had mEMG abnormality. Diagnostic yield of cnEMG is higher than mEMG in L4 radiculopathy. mEMG may not contribute much to the diagnosis of lumbar radiculopathy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Presented in part at the 18th Annual Meeting of the Turkish Clinical Neurophysiology EEG-EMG Society, June 2002, Turkey.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ulas, U.H., Cengiz, B., Alanoglu, E. et al. Comparison of sensitivities of macro EMG and concentric needle EMG in L4 radiculopathy. Neurol Sci 24, 258–260 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-003-0150-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-003-0150-y

Key words

Navigation