Skip to main content
Log in

Discrimination of cat-directed speech from human-directed speech in a population of indoor companion cats (Felis catus)

Animal Cognition Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Cite this article

A Correction to this article was published on 10 December 2022

This article has been updated


In contemporary western cultures, most humans talk to their pet companions. Speech register addressed to companion animals shares common features with speech addressed to young children, which are distinct from the typical adult-directed speech (ADS). The way dogs respond to dog-directed speech (DDS) has raised scientists’ interest. In contrast, much less is known about how cats perceive and respond to cat-directed speech (CDS). The primary aim of this study was to evaluate whether cats are more responsive to CDS than ADS. Secondarily, we seek to examine if the cats’ responses to human vocal stimuli would differ when it was elicited by their owner or by a stranger. We performed playback experiments and tested a cohort of 16 companion cats in a habituation–dishabituation paradigm, which allows for the measurement of subjects’ reactions without extensive training. Here, we report new findings that cats can discriminate speech specifically addressed to them from speech addressed to adult humans, when sentences are uttered by their owners. When hearing sentences uttered by strangers, cats did not appear to discriminate between ADS and CDS. These findings bring a new dimension to the consideration of human–cat relationship, as they imply the development of a particular communication into human–cat dyads, that relies upon experience. We discuss these new findings in the light of recent literature investigating cats’ sociocognitive abilities and human–cat attachment. Our results highlight the importance of one-to-one relationships for cats, reinforcing recent literature regarding the ability for cats and humans to form strong bonds.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Data availability

Data are available from the corresponding author on request.

Code availability

Not applicable.

Change history


Download references


We would like to thank MARTIN SELLIER® for their financial support. Thanks to Caroline Gilbert for allowing this study to take place at EnvA and to Laëtitia Matray for helping in the recruitment of cat owners. Thanks to Chloé Tavernier and Alexandre Clasen for their participation in these experiments. Many thanks to owners and to their cats, who accepted to take part in this study.


This research was supported by French ministry of higher education and research (Ministère de l'Enseignement supérieur, de la Recherche et de l'Innovation) and MARTIN SELLIER® company, through the CIFRE program.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Charlotte de Mouzon.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in the present study were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. All applicable international, national and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed and all procedures performed in experiments involving animals were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institution at which the study was conducted. The study received the approval of the ethical committee of EnvA (COMERC), Saisine n 2018-10-24.

Consent to participate

Written informed consent was obtained from all animal owners.

Consent for publication

Written consent was obtained from all animal owners to include the image of their cat in the article.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The original online version of this article was revised due to change in the reference section.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 2183 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

de Mouzon, C., Gonthier, M. & Leboucher, G. Discrimination of cat-directed speech from human-directed speech in a population of indoor companion cats (Felis catus). Anim Cogn 26, 611–619 (2023).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: