Skip to main content
Log in

Decision-making at the time of parasitism: cowbirds prefer to peck eggs with weaker shells

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Animal Cognition Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Interspecific avian brood parasites, like cuckoos and cowbirds, lay their eggs in nests of other species, the hosts, which take over the entire parental care of the parasite's eggs and chicks. This breeding strategy requires decisions that may affect the parasite's reproductive success. During the breeding season, cowbirds search for host nests and revisit them to monitor its progress and parasitize at the time host laying begins. When visiting hosts nests, they repeatedly peck the nest contents trying to destroy one or more eggs. This behaviour favours parasite's offspring by reducing the competition for food with nestmates. We evaluated if the egg-pecking behaviour of female shiny (Molothrus bonariensis) and screaming (M. rufoaxillaris) cowbirds is affected by the strength and the size of the eggs they find in the nest. We presented to wild-caught females artificial clutches with two natural eggs that differ in size and shell strength. We found that female shiny and screaming cowbirds adjusted egg-pecking behaviour based on the strength but not on the size of the eggs. When differences in strength between eggs were high, both cowbird species pecked more frequently the egg with the weaker shell, increasing the probability of a successful puncture. Our results indicate that female cowbirds can discriminate eggs through the strength of the shell, and by choosing the weaker egg to peck, they increase the probability of puncturing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated and analysed during the current study are included as supplementary material.

Code availability

Not applicable.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the Elsa Shaw de Pearson Foundation for supporting our fieldwork at Reserva El Destino. We also thank two anonymous reviewers and the Associate Editor Kazuhiro Goto who provided their helpful comments on a previous version of the manuscript. This work was supported by Grants of the Agencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y Tecnológica and the University of Buenos Aires.

Funding

This work was supported by grants of the Agencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y Tecnológica and the University of Buenos Aires.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vanina D. Fiorini.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

This manuscript is not being considered elsewhere and all coauthors have agreed to this submission. We have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Ethical approval

Experiment protocol has been established in compliance with the ethical standards, ensuring that all necessary precautions have been taken and the welfare of the birds has been respected. All work complied with the Argentinean Law for the Conservation of Wild Fauna (Ley Nacional de Fauna 22421/81) and was conducted with the authorization from the Organismo Provincial para el Desarrollo Sostenible, Argentina (Permit Number 202/12-O.P.D.S.).

Consent to participate

All coauthors gave their approval for the submission.

Consent for publication

All coauthors gave their approval for publication.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (XLS 39 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cossa, N.A., Reboreda, J.C. & Fiorini, V.D. Decision-making at the time of parasitism: cowbirds prefer to peck eggs with weaker shells. Anim Cogn 25, 275–285 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-021-01549-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-021-01549-6

Keywords

Navigation