Advertisement

Animal Cognition

, Volume 22, Issue 5, pp 673–686 | Cite as

Flexible gaze-following in rhesus monkeys

  • Rosemary BettleEmail author
  • Alexandra G. Rosati
Original Paper

Abstract

Humans are characterized by complex social cognitive abilities that emerge early in development. Comparative studies of nonhuman primates can illuminate the evolutionary history of these social capacities. We examined the cognitive skills that rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) use to follow gaze, a foundational skill in human social development. While rhesus monkeys can make inferences about others’ gaze when competing, it is unclear how they think about gaze information in other contexts. In study 1, monkeys (n = 64) observed a demonstrator look upwards either in a barrier condition where a box was overhead, so that monkeys could not see the target of her gaze, or a no barrier condition where nothing blocked her view. In study 2, monkeys (n = 59) could approach to observe the target of the demonstrator’s gaze when the demonstrator looked behind a barrier on the ground or, in the no barrier condition, behind a window frame in the same location. Monkeys were more likely to directly look up in study 1 if they could initially see the location where the demonstrator was looking, but they did not preferentially reorient their bodies to observe the out-of-view location when they could not see that location. In study 2, monkeys did preferentially reorient, but at low rates. This indicates that rhesus monkeys can use social cognitive processes outside of competitive contexts to model what others can or cannot see, but may not be especially motivated to see what others look at in non-competitive contexts, as they reorient infrequently or in an inconsistent fashion. These similarities and differences between gaze-following in monkeys and children can help to illuminate the evolution of human social cognition.

Keywords

Social development Gaze-following Theory of mind Competition Primates Comparative cognition 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Megan Cole, Francesca De Petrillo, Hayoung Chang, Megan Mulhinch, and Yijia Zheng for assistance with data collection and coding; Thore Bergman for helpful comments on an earlier version of the manuscript; and CSCAR at the University of Michigan for statistical advice. The authors are grateful to the Cayo Santiago Field Station and staff including Angelina Ruiz Lambides, Nahiri Rivera Barreto, Giselle Caraballo Cruz, and Bianca Giura for their research support.

Funding

This work was supported by a National Center for Research Resources CM-5-P40RR003640-13 award to the Caribbean Primate Research Center and the University of Puerto Rico, and an Office of Research Infrastructure Programs (ORIP) of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) through Grant Number 5P40OD012217 to the Caribbean Primate Research Center and the University of Puerto Rico. This research was supported in part by a Human Evolutionary Biology Early Training and Research Support Grant from Harvard University to RB. AR was supported by a Sloan Foundation fellowship.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed. All non-invasive behavioral tests were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) for the University of Puerto Rico Medical Sciences Campus (protocol #A140116), and adhered to site guidelines for animal research.

Supplementary material

10071_2019_1263_MOESM1_ESM.docx (21 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 20 kb)

Supplementary material 2 (MP4 119161 kb)

Supplementary material 3 (MP4 93662 kb)

References

  1. Anderson JR, Sallaberry P, Barbier H (1995) Use of experimenter-given cues during object-choice tasks by capuchin monkeys. Anim Behav 49(1):201–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson JR, Montant M, Schmitt D (1996) Rhesus monkeys fail to use gaze direction as an experimenter-given cue in an object-choice task. Behav Proc 37(1):47–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baayen RH, Milin P (2010) Analyzing reaction times. Int J Psychol Res 3(2):12–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baldwin DA, Moses LJ (1994) Early understanding of referential intent and attentional focus: evidence from language and emotion. In: Lewis C, Mitchell P (eds) Children’s early understanding of mind: origins and development. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc, Hillsdale, NJ, pp 133–156Google Scholar
  5. Bettle R, Rosati AG (2016) Understanding human gaze. In: Encyclopedia of evolutionary psychological science, pp 1–4Google Scholar
  6. Bolker BM, Brooks ME, Clark CJ, Geange SW, Poulsen JR, Stevens MHH, White J-SS (2009) Generalized linear mixed models: a practical guide for ecology and evolution. Trends Ecol Evol 24(3):127–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bräuer J, Call J, Tomasello M (2005) All great ape species follow gaze to distant locations and around barriers. J Comp Psychol 119(2):145–154CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Bray J, Krupenye C, Hare B (2014) Ring-tailed lemurs (Lemur catta) exploit information about what others can see but not what they can hear. Anim Cogn 17(3):735–744CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Brent LJ, Heilbronner SR, Horvath JE, Gonzalez-Martinez J, Ruiz-Lambides A, Robinson AG, Platt ML (2013) Genetic origins of social networks in rhesus macaques. Sci Rep 3:1042CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Brooks R, Meltzoff AN (2005) The development of gaze following and its relation to language. Dev Sci 8(6):535–543CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Bulloch MJ, Boysen ST, Furlong EE (2008) Visual attention and its relation to knowledge states in chimpanzees, Pan troglodytes. Anim Behav 76(4):1147–1155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Burkart JM, Hrdy SB, Van Schaik CP (2009) Cooperative breeding and human cognitive evolution. Evol Anthropol Issues News Rev Issues News Rev 18(5):175–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Butler SC, Caron AJ, Brooks R (2000) Infant understanding of the referential nature of looking. J Cogn Dev 1(4):359–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Butterworth G, Cochran E (1980) Towards a mechanism of joint visual attention in human infancy. Int J Behav Dev 3(3):253–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Butterworth G, Jarrett N (1991) What minds have in common is space: spatial mechanisms serving joint visual attention in infancy. Br J Dev Psychol 9(1):55–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Byrne R, Whiten A (1989) Machiavellian intelligence: social expertise and the evolution of intellect in monkeys, apes, and humans. Oxford Science Publications, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  17. Call J, Hare BA, Tomasello M (1998) Chimpanzee gaze following in an object-choice task. Anim Cogn 1(2):89–99CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Call J, Agnetta B, Tomasello M (2000) Cues that chimpanzees do and do not use to find hidden objects. Anim Cogn 3(1):23–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Call J, Hare B, Carpenter M, Tomasello M (2004) ‘Unwilling’ versus ‘unable’: chimpanzees’ understanding of human intentional action. Dev Sci 7(4):488–498CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Cheney DL (2011) Extent and limits of cooperation in animals. Proc Natl Acad Sci 108(Supplement 2):10902–10909CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Crockford C, Wittig RM, Mundry R, Zuberbühler K (2012) Wild chimpanzees inform ignorant group members of danger. Curr Biol 22(2):142–146CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Csibra G, Gergely G (2009) Natural pedagogy. Trends Cogn Sci 13(4):148–153CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Davidson GL, Butler S, Fernández-Juricic E, Thornton A, Clayton NS (2014) Gaze sensitivity: function and mechanisms from sensory and cognitive perspectives. Anim Behav 87:3–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Deaner RO, Platt ML (2003) Reflexive social attention in monkeys and humans. Curr Biol 13(18):1609–1613CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Drayton LA, Santos LR (2016) A decade of theory of mind research on Cayo Santiago: insights into rhesus macaque social cognition. Am J Primatol 78(1):106–116CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Drayton LA, Santos LR (2017) Do rhesus macaques, Macaca mulatta, understand what others know when gaze following? Anim Behav 134:193–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Emery NJ, Lorincz EN, Perrett DI, Oram MW, Baker CI (1997) Gaze following and joint attention in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta). J Comp Psychol 111(3):286–293CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Ferrari P, Kohler E, Fogassi L, Gallese V (2000) The ability to follow eye gaze and its emergence during development in macaque monkeys. Proc Natl Acad Sci 97(25):13997–14002CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Flom R, Lee K, Muir D (2017) Gaze-following: Its development and significance. Psychology Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  30. Flombaum JI, Santos LR (2005) Rhesus monkeys attribute perceptions to others. Curr Biol 15(5):447–452CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Friesen CK, Kingstone A (1998) The eyes have it! Reflexive orienting is triggered by nonpredictive gaze. Psychon Bull Rev 5(3):490–495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Goossens BM, Dekleva M, Reader SM, Sterck EH, Bolhuis JJ (2008) Gaze following in monkeys is modulated by observed facial expressions. Anim Behav 75(5):1673–1681CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Grueneisen S, Duguid S, Saur H, Tomasello M (2017) Children, chimpanzees, and bonobos adjust the visibility of their actions for cooperators and competitors. Sci Rep 7(1):8504CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. Hare B (2001) Can competitive paradigms increase the validity of experiments on primate social cognition? Anim Cogn 4(3):269–280CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Hare B (2017) Survival of the friendliest: homo sapiens evolved via selection for prosociality. Annu Rev Psychol 68:155–186CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Hare B, Tomasello M (2004) Chimpanzees are more skilful in competitive than in cooperative cognitive tasks. Anim Behav 68(3):571–581CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hare B, Tomasello M (2005) Human-like social skills in dogs? Trends Cogn Sci 9(9):439–444CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Hare B, Call J, Agnetta B, Tomasello M (2000) Chimpanzees know what conspecifics do and do not see. Anim Behav 59(4):771–785CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Hare B, Call J, Tomasello M (2001) Do chimpanzees know what conspecifics know? Anim Behav 61(1):139–151CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Hare B, Call J, Tomasello M (2006) Chimpanzees deceive a human competitor by hiding. Cognition 101(3):495–514CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Higham JP, Maestripieri D (2010) Revolutionary coalitions in male rhesus macaques. Behaviour 147(13):1889–1908Google Scholar
  42. Hood BM, Willen JD, Driver J (1998) Adult’s eyes trigger shifts of visual attention in human infants. Psychol Sci 9(2):131–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Hopkins WD, Taglialatela JP, Leavens DA (2007) Chimpanzees differentially produce novel vocalizations to capture the attention of a human. Anim Behav 73(2):281–286CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  44. Hostetter AB, Russell JL, Freeman H, Hopkins WD (2007) Now you see me, now you don’t: evidence that chimpanzees understand the role of the eyes in attention. Anim Cogn 10(1):55–62CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Itakura S (1996) An exploratory study of gaze-monitoring in nonhuman primates. Jpn Psychol Res 38(3):174–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Itakura S, Tanaka M (1998) Use of experimenter-given cues during object-choice tasks by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), an orangutan (Pongo pygmaeus), and human infants (Homo sapiens). J Comp Psychol 112(2):119–126CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Joly M, Micheletta J, De Marco A, Langermans JA, Sterck EH, Waller BM (2017) Comparing physical and social cognitive skills in macaque species with different degrees of social tolerance. Proc R Soc B 284(1862):20162738CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Kaminski J, Call J, Tomasello M (2008) Chimpanzees know what others know, but not what they believe. Cognition 109(2):224–234CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Krupenye C, Kano F, Hirata S, Call J, Tomasello M (2016) Great apes anticipate that other individuals will act according to false beliefs. Science 354(6308):110–114CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Lee K, Eskritt M, Symons LA, Muir D (1998) Children’s use of triadic eye gaze information for “mind reading”. Dev Psychol 34(3):525–539CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Lindburg DG (1971) The rhesus monkey in North India: an ecological and behavioral study. Primate Behav Dev Field Lab Res 2:1–106Google Scholar
  52. Lo S, Andrews S (2015) To transform or not to transform: using generalized linear mixed models to analyse reaction time data. Front Psychol 6:1171CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  53. Lyons DE, Santos LR (2006) Ecology, domain specificity, and the origins of theory of mind: is competition the catalyst? Philos Compass 1(5):481–492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. MacLean EL, Hare B (2012) Bonobos and chimpanzees infer the target of another’s attention. Anim Behav 83(2):345–353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. MacLean EL, Hare B, Nunn CL, Addessi E, Amici F, Anderson RC, Barnard AM (2014) The evolution of self-control. Proc Natl Acad Sci 111(20):E2140–E2148CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Marticorena DC, Ruiz AM, Mukerji C, Goddu A, Santos LR (2011) Monkeys represent others’ knowledge but not their beliefs. Dev Sci 14(6):1406–1416CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  57. Martin A, Santos LR (2014) The origins of belief representation: monkeys fail to automatically represent others’ beliefs. Cognition 130(3):300–308CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Martin A, Santos LR (2016) What cognitive representations support primate theory of mind? Trends Cogn Sci 20(5):375–382CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Melis AP, Tomasello M (2013) Chimpanzees’ (Pan troglodytes) strategic helping in a collaborative task. Biol Lett 9(2):20130009CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  60. Melis AP, Call J, Tomasello M (2006) Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) conceal visual and auditory information from others. J Comp Psychol 120(2):154–162CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Micheletta J, Waller BM (2012) Friendship affects gaze following in a tolerant species of macaque, Macaca nigra. Anim Behav 83(2):459–467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Moll H, Meltzoff AN (2011) Joint attention as the fundamental basis of understanding perspectives. In: Seemann A (ed) Joint attention: new developments in psychology, philosophy of mind, and social neuroscience. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 393–413Google Scholar
  63. Moll H, Tomasello M (2004) 12-and 18-month-old infants follow gaze to spaces behind barriers. Dev Sci 7(1):F1–F9CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Moll H, Tomasello M (2007) How 14-and 18-month-olds know what others have experienced. Dev Psychol 43(2):309–317CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Morales M, Mundy P, Rojas J (1998) Following the direction of gaze and language development in 6-month-olds. Infant Behav Dev 21(2):373–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Okamoto-Barth S, Call J, Tomasello M (2007) Great apes’ understanding of other individuals’ line of sight. Psychol Sci 18(5):462–468CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Partan SR (2002) Single and multichannel signal composition: facial expressions and vocalizations of rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta). Behaviour 139(8):993–1027CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Petit O, Desportes C, Thierry B (1992) Differential probability of “coproduction” in two species of macaque (Macaca tonkeana, M. mulatta). Ethology 90(2):107–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Rawlins RC, Kessler MJ (eds) (1987) The Cayo Santiago macaques: history, behavior and biology. State University of New York Press, AlbanyGoogle Scholar
  70. R Development Core Team (2017) A language and environment for statistical computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org. Accessed 9 Oct 2017
  71. Ricciardelli P, Carcagno S, Vallar G, Bricolo E (2013) Is gaze following purely reflexive or goal-directed instead? Revisiting the automaticity of orienting attention by gaze cues. Exp Brain Res 224(1):93–106CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. Rosati AG, Hare B (2009) Looking past the model species: diversity in gaze-following skills across primates. Curr Opin Neurobiol 19(1):45–51CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Rosati AG, Santos LR (2016) Spontaneous metacognition in rhesus monkeys. Psychol Sci 27(9):1181–1191CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  74. Rosati AG, Santos LR (2017) Tolerant Barbary macaques maintain juvenile levels of social attention in old age, but despotic rhesus macaques do not. Anim Behav 130:199–207CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  75. Rosati AG, Wobber V, Hughes K, Santos LR (2014) Comparative developmental psychology: how is human cognitive development unique? Evol Psychol 12(2):448–473CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. Rosati AG, Arre AM, Platt ML, Santos LR (2016) Rhesus monkeys show human-like changes in gaze following across the lifespan. Proc R Soc B 283:20160376CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. Ruiz A, Gómez JC, Roeder JJ, Byrne RW (2009) Gaze following and gaze priming in lemurs. Anim Cogn 12(3):427–434CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. Sandel AA, MacLean EL, Hare B (2011) Evidence from four lemur species that ringtailed lemur social cognition converges with that of haplorhine primates. Anim Behav 81(5):925–931CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Santos LR, Nissen AG, Ferrugia JA (2006) Rhesus monkeys, Macaca mulatta, know what others can and cannot hear. Anim Behav 71(5):1175–1181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Senju A, Csibra G (2008) Gaze following in human infants depends on communicative signals. Curr Biol 18(9):668–671CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. Shepherd SV (2010) Following gaze: gaze-following behavior as a window into social cognition. Front Integr Neurosci 4:5PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  82. Shepherd SV, Deaner RO, Platt ML (2006) Social status gates social attention in monkeys. Curr Biol 16(4):R119–R120CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. Teufel C, Alexis DM, Clayton NS, Davis G (2010) Mental-state attribution drives rapid, reflexive gaze following. Attent Percept Psychophys 72(3):695–705CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Thierry B (2002) Covariation of conflict management patterns across macaque species. In: Aureli F, de Waal FBM (eds) Natural conflict resolution. University of California Press, Berkeley, pp 106–128Google Scholar
  85. Tomasello M (1995) Joint attention as social cognition. In: Moore C, Dunham PJ (eds) Joint attention: its origins and role in development. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc, Hillsdale, NJ, pp 103–130Google Scholar
  86. Tomasello M (2014) A natural history of human thinking. Harvard University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Tomasello M, Carpenter M (2007) Shared intentionality. Dev Sci 10(1):121–125CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  88. Tomasello M, Hare B, Agnetta B (1999) Chimpanzees, Pan troglodytes, follow gaze direction geometrically. Anim Behav 58(4):769–777CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. Tomasello M, Hare B, Fogleman T (2001) The ontogeny of gaze following in chimpanzees, Pan troglodytes, and rhesus macaques, Macaca mulatta. Anim Behav 61(2):335–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Vick S-J, Anderson JR (2000) Learning and limits of use of eye gaze by capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) in an object-choice task. J Comp Psychol 114(2):200–207CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  91. Widdig A, Nürnberg P, Krawczak M, Streich WJ, Bercovitch F (2002) Affiliation and aggression among adult female rhesus macaques: a genetic analysis of paternal cohorts. Behaviour 139(2):371–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Widdig A, Streich WJ, Nürnberg P, Croucher PJ, Bercovitch FB, Krawczak M (2006) Paternal kin bias in the agonistic interventions of adult female rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 61(2):205–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Yamamoto S, Humle T, Tanaka M (2012) Chimpanzees’ flexible targeted helping based on an understanding of conspecifics’ goals. Proc Natl Acad Sci 109(9):3588–3592CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborUSA
  2. 2.Department of AnthropologyUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborUSA

Personalised recommendations