Skip to main content
Log in

Domestic horses (Equus ferus caballus) fail to intuitively reason about object properties like solidity and weight

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
Animal Cognition Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

From early infancy, humans reason about the external world in terms of identifiable, solid, cohesive objects persisting in space and time. This is one of the most fundamental human skills, which may be part of our innate conception of object properties. Although object permanence has been extensively studied across a variety of taxa, little is known about how non-human animals reason about other object properties. In this study, we therefore tested how domestic horses (Equus ferus caballus) intuitively reason about object properties like solidity and height, to locate hidden food. Horses were allowed to look for a food reward behind two opaque screens, only one of which had either the proper height or inclination to hide food rewards. Our results suggest that horses could not intuitively reason about physical object properties, but rather learned to select the screen with the proper height or inclination from the second set of 5 trials.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  • Aguiar A, Baillargeon R (1999) Perseveration and problem solving in infancy. Adv Child Dev Behav 27:135–180

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Aguiar ACA, Baillargeon R (2002) Developments in young infants’ reasoning about occluded objects. Cogn Psychol 45:267–336

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Albiach-Serrano A, Bräuer J, Cacchione T, Zickert N, Amici F (2012) The effect of domestication and ontogeny in swine cognition (Sus scrofa scrofa and S. s. domestica). Appl Anim Behav Sci 141:25–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baillargeon R (1987) Object permanence in 3½- and 4½-month-old infants. Dev Psychol 23:655–664

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baillargeon R (1995) Physical reasoning in infancy. In: Gazzaniga MS (ed) The cognitive neurosciences. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 181–204

    Google Scholar 

  • Baillargeon R, Devos J (1991) Object permanence in young infants: further evidence. Child Dev 62:1227–1246

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baillargeon R, Spelke ES, Wasserman S (1985) Object permanence in five-month-old infants. Cognition 20:191–208

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baragli P, Vitale V, Paoletti E, Mengoli M, Sighieri C (2011) Encoding the object position for assessment of short term spatial memory in horses (Equus caballus). Int J Comp Psychol 24:284–291

    Google Scholar 

  • Brubaker L, Udell MA (2016) Cognition and learning in horses (Equus caballus): what we know and why we should ask more. Behav Process 126:121–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cacchione T, Call J (2010) Do gorillas (Gorilla gorilla) and orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus) fail to represent objects in the context of cohesion violations? Cognition 116:193–203

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cacchione T, Rakoczy H (2017) Comparative metaphysics: thinking about objects in space and time. In: Call J (ed) Handbook of comparative psychology. American Psychological Association, Washington, pp 579–599

    Google Scholar 

  • Call J (2007) Apes know that hidden objects can affect the orientation of other objects. Cognition 105:1–25

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chiandetti C, Vallortigara G (2011) Intuitive physical reasoning about occluded objects by inexperienced chicks. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 278:2621–2627

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanggi EB (2003) Discrimination learning based on relative size concepts in horses (Equus caballus). Appl Anim Behav Sci 83:201–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanggi EB, Ingersoll JF (2009) Long-term memory for categories and concepts in horses (Equus caballus). Anim Cogn 12:451–462

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hespos S, Baillargeon R (2006) Décalage in infants’ knowledge about occlusion and containment events: converging evidence from action tasks. Cognition 99:31–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kellman PJ, Spelke ES (1983) Perception of partly occluded objects in infancy. Cogn Psychol 15:483–524

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kundey SMA, Reyes ADL, Taglang C, Baruch A, German R (2010) Domesticated dogs’ (Canis familiaris) use of the solidity principle. Anim Cogn 13:497–505

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mclean AN (2004) Short-term spatial memory in the domestic horse. Appl Anim Behav Sci 85:93–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy J, Arkins S (2007) Equine learning behaviour. Behav Process 76:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osthaus B, Proops L, Hocking I, Burden F (2013) Spatial cognition and perseveration by horses, donkeys and mules in a simple A-not-B detour task. Anim Cogn 16:301–305

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pattison KF, Miller HC, Rayburn-Reeves R, Zentall T (2010) The case of the disappearing bone: dogs’ understanding of the physical properties of objects. Behav Process 85:278–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Core Team (2016) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria

    Google Scholar 

  • Rakoczy H (2015) Comparative metaphysics: the development of representing natural and normative regularities in human and non-human primates. Phenomenol Cogn Sci 14:683–697

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rochais C, Fureix C, Lesimple C, Hausberger M (2016) Lower attention to daily environment: a novel cue for detecting chronic horses’ back pain? Sci Rep 6:20117

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Santos LR, Hauser MD (2002) A non-human primate’s understanding of solidity: dissociations between seeing and acting. Dev Sci 5:1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spelke ES (1990) Principles of object perception. Cogn Sci 14:29–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spelke ES, Breinlinger K, Macomber J, Jacobson K (1992) Origins of knowledge. Psychol Rev 99:605–632

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wilcox T, Nadel L, Rosser R (1996) Location memory in healthy preterm and full-term infants. Infant Behav Dev 19:309–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Federica Amici.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All applicable international, national and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 32 kb)

Supplementary material 2 (WMV 12694 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Haemmerli, S., Thill, C., Amici, F. et al. Domestic horses (Equus ferus caballus) fail to intuitively reason about object properties like solidity and weight. Anim Cogn 21, 441–446 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-018-1177-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-018-1177-z

Keywords

Navigation