Advertisement

Animal Cognition

, Volume 21, Issue 2, pp 175–195 | Cite as

A case for methodological overhaul and increased study of executive function in the domestic dog (Canis lupus familiaris)

  • Mariana R. OlsenEmail author
Review

Abstract

Executive function (EF) allows for self-regulation of behavior including maintaining focus in the face of distraction, inhibiting behavior that is suboptimal or inappropriate in a given context, and updating the contents of working memory. While EF has been studied extensively in humans, it has only recently become a topic of research in the domestic dog. In this paper, I argue for increased study of dog EF by explaining how it might influence the owner–dog bond, human safety, and dog welfare, as well as reviewing the current literature dedicated to EF in dogs. In “EF and its Application to “Man’s Best Friend” section, I briefly describe EF and how it is relevant to dog behavior. In “Previous investigations into EF in dogs” section, I provide a review of the literature pertaining to EF in dogs, specifically tasks used to assess abilities like inhibitory control, cognitive flexibility, and working memory capacity. In “Insights and limitations of previous studies” section, I consider limitations of existing studies that must be addressed in future research. Finally, in “Future directions” section, I propose future directions for meaningful research on EF in dogs.

Keywords

Dogs Canine Cognition Executive function Attention 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The author declares that she has no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by the author.

References

  1. Alexander JK, Hillier A, Smith RM, Tivarus ME, Beversdorf DQ (2007) Beta-adrenergic modulation of cognitive flexibility during stress. J Cogn Neurosci 19:468–478PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (n.d.). Pet statistics. Retrieved from https://www.aspca.org/animal-homelessness/shelter-intake-and-surrender/pet-statistics
  3. Amici F, Aureli F, Call J (2008) Fission-fusion dynamics, behavioral flexibility, and inhibitory control in primates. Curr Biol 18(18):1415–1419PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Andics A, Gácsi M, Faragó T, Kis A, Miklósi Á (2014) Voice-sensitive regions in the dog and human brain are revealed by comparative fMRI. Curr Biol 24:574–578PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Andics A, Gábor A, Gácsi M, Faragó T, Szabó D, Miklósi Á (2016) Neural mechanisms for lexical processing in dogs. Science 353(6303):1030–1032PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Arden R, Bensky MK, Adams MJ (2016) A review of cognitive abilities in dogs, 1911 through 2016: more individual differences, please! Curr Dir Psychol Sci 25(5):307–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Arnsten AF, Goldman-Rakic PS (1998) Noise stress impairs prefrontal cortical cognitive function in monkeys: evidence for a hyperdopaminergic mechanism. Arch Gen Psychiatry 55(4):362–368PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Azkona G, García-Belenguer S, Chacón G, Rosado B, León M, Palacio J (2009) Prevalence and risk factors of behavioural changes associated with age-related cognitive impairment in geriatric dogs. J Small Anim Pract 50:87–91PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Baddeley AD, Hitch G (1974) Working memory. Psychol Learn Motiv 8:47–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Balota DA, Tse C, Hutchison KA, Spieler DH, Duchek JM, Morris JC (2010) Predicting conversion to dementia of the Alzheimer’s type in a healthy control sample: the power of errors in Stroop color naming. Psychol Aging 25(1):208–218PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Barber ALA, Randi D, Müller CA, Huber L (2016) The processing of human emotional faces by pet and lab dogs: evidence for lateralization and experience effects. PLoS ONE 11(4):e0152393.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0152393 PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Barkley RA (1997) Behavioral inhibition, sustained attention, and executive functions: constructing a unifying theory of ADHD. Psychol Bull 121(1):65–94PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Baumeister RF (2014) Self-regulation, ego depletion, and inhibition. Neuropsychologia 65:313–319PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Baumeister RF, Bratslavsky E, Muraven M, Tice DM (1998) Ego depletion: is the active self a limited resource? Personal Process Individ Differ 74(5):1252–1265Google Scholar
  15. Beatty J (1982) Task-evoked pupillary responses, processing load, and the structure of processing resources. Psychol Bull 91(2):276–292PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Berg EA (1948) A simple objective technique for measuring flexibility in thinking. J Gen Psychol 39(1):15–22PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Berns GS, Cook PF (2016) Why did the dog walk into the MRI? Curr Dir Psychol Sci 25(5):363–369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Berns GS, Brooks AM, Spivak M (2012) Functional MRI in awake unrestrained dogs. PLoS ONE 7(5):e38027.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0038027 PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Berns GS, Brooks AM, Spivak M (2015) Scent of the familiar: an fMRI study of canine brain responses to familiar and unfamiliar human and dog odors. Behav Proc 110:37–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Beurms S, Miller HC (2016) Sharing more than the sofa: what dogs can teach us about human self-control. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 25(5):351–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Bjork RA, Whitten WB (1974) Recency-sensitive retrieval processes in long-term free recall. Cogn Psychol 6:173–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Boogert NJ, Anderson RC, Peters S, Searcy WA, Nowicki S (2011) Song repertoire size in male song sparrows correlates with detour reaching, but not with other cognitive measures. Anim Behav 81(6):1209–1216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Braver TS, Gray JR, Burgess GC (2007) Explaining the many varieties of working memory variation: Dual mechanisms of cognitive control. In: Conway A, Jarrold C, Kane MJ, Miyake A, Towse JN (eds) Variation in working memory. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 76–106Google Scholar
  24. Bray EE, MacLean EL, Hare BA (2014) Context specificity of inhibitory control in dogs. Anim Cogn 17(1):15–31PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Bray EE, MacLean EL, Hare BA (2015) Increasing arousal enhances inhibitory control in calm but not excitable dogs. Anim Cogn 18(6):1317–1329PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Brown J (1958) Some tests of the decay theory of immediate memory. Q J of Exp Psychol 10(1):12–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Button KS, Ioannidis JPA, Mokrysz C, Nosek BA, Flint J, Robinson ESJ, Munafð MR (2013) Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience. Nat Rev Neurosci 14:365–376PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Casey RA, Loftus B, Bolster C, Richards GJ, Blackwell EJ (2014) Human directed aggression in domestic dogs (Canis familiaris): occurrence in different contexts and risk factors. Appl Anim Behav Sci 152:52–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Cepeda NJ, Kramer AF, Gonzalez de Sather JCM (2001) Changes in executive control across the lifespan: examination of task-switching performance. Dev Psychol 37(5):715–730PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Clark A, Chalmers D (1998) The extended mind. Analysis 58(1):7–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Conway ARA, Engle RW (1994) Working memory and retrieval: a resource-dependent inhibition model. J Exp Psychol Gen 123(4):354–373PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Conway AR, Cowan N, Bunting MF (2001) The cocktail party phenomenon revisited: the importance of working memory capacity. Psychon Bull Rev 8(2):331–335PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Conway ARA, Kane MJ, Engle RW (2003) Working memory capacity and its relation to general intelligence. Trends Cognit Sci 7(12):547–552CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Cook PF, Prichard A, Spivak M, Berns GS (2016a) Awake canine fMRI predicts dogs’ preference for praise vs food. Soc Cognit Affect Neurosci 11(12):1853–1862Google Scholar
  35. Cook PF, Spivak M, Berns G (2016b) Neurobehavioral evidence for individual differences in canine cognitive control: an awake fMRI study. Anim Cogn 19:867–878PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Cotman CW, Head E, Muggenburg BA, Zicker S, Milgram NW (2002) Brain aging in the canine: a diet enriched in antioxidants reduces cognitive dysfunction. Neurobiol Aging 23:809–818PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Cuaya LV, Hernández-Pérez R, Concha L (2016) Our faces in the dog’s brain: functional imaging reveals temporal cortex activation during perception of human faces. PLoS ONE 11(3):e0149431.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149431 PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Darwin C (1871) The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex. Murray, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. De Pisapia N, Braver TS (2006) A model of dual control mechanisms through anterior cingulate and prefrontal cortex interactions. Neurocomputing 69(10):1322–1326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Deater-Deckard K, Sewell MD, Petrill SA, Thompson LA (2010) Maternal working memory and reactive negativity in parenting. Psychol Sci 21(1):75–79PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Deater-Deckard K, Wang Z, Chen N, Bell MA (2012) Maternal executive function, harsh parenting, and child conduct problems. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 53(10):1084–1091PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Diamond A (1990) Developmental time course in human infants and infant monkeys, and the neural bases of, inhibitory control in reaching. Ann N Y Acad Sci 608(1):637–676PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Diamond A (2002) Normal development of prefrontal cortex from birth to young adulthood. In: Stuss DT, Knight RT (eds) Principles of frontal lobe function. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 466–503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Diamond A, Goldman-Rakic P (1989) Comparison of human infants and rhesus monkeys on Piaget’s AB task: evidence for dependence on dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Exp Brain Res 74:24–40PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Dilks DD, Cook P, Weiller SK, Berns HP, Spivak M, Berns GS (2015) Awake fMRI reveals a specialized region in dog temporal cortex for face processing. PeerJ 3:1115.  https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1115 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Dorey NR, Udell MAR, Wynne CDL (2009) Breed differences in dogs’ sensitivity to human points: a meta-analysis. Behav Proc 81(3):409–415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Dorey NR, Udell MAR, Wynne CDL (2010) When do domestic dogs, Canis familiaris, start to understand human pointing? The role of ontogeny in the development of interspecies communication. Anim Behav 79(1):37–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Duckworth AL, Seligman ME (2005) Self-discipline outdoes IQ in predicting academic performance of adolescents. Psychol Sci 16(12):939–944PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Duckworth AL, Tsukayama E, Kirby TA (2013) Is it really self-control? Examining the predictive power of the delay of gratification task. Perspect Soc Psychol Bull 39(7):843–855CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Dunbar RI (1998) The social brain hypothesis. Brain 9(10):178–190Google Scholar
  51. Engle RW (2002) Working memory as executive attention. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 11(1):19–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Fagnani J, Barrera G, Carballo F, Bentosela M (2016) Is previous experience important for inhibitory control? A comparison between shelter and pet dogs in A-not-B and cylinder tasks. Anim Cogn 19(6):1165–1172PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Fiset S, Beaulieu C, Landry F (2003) Duration of dogs’ (Canis familiaris) working memory in search for disappearing objects. Anim Cogn 6:1–10PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Fuster JM, Alexander GE (1971) Neuron activity related to short-term memory. Science 173(3997):652–654PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Garavan H, Ross TJ, Stein EA (1999) Right hemispheric dominance of inhibitory control: an event-related functional MRI study. Proc Natl Acad Sci 96(14):8301–8306PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Gardner DM, Gerdes AC (2015) A review of peer relationships and friendships in youth with ADHD. J Atten Disord 19(10):844–855PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Gazzaniga MS (2009) Neuroanatomy and development. In: Gazzaniga MS, Ivry RB, Mangun GR (eds) Cognitive Neuroscience: The Biology of the Mind. W. W. Norton & Company, New York, pp 59–109Google Scholar
  58. Goldwater BC (1972) Psychological significance of pupillary movements. Psychol Bull 77(5):340–355PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Gray DT, Smith AC, Burke SN, Gazzaley A, Barnes CA (2017) Attentional updating and monitoring and affective shifting are impacted independently by aging in macaque monkeys. Behav Brain Res 322:329–338PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Hare B, Tomasello M (2005) Human-like social skills in dogs? Trends Cognit Sci 9(9):439–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Hare B, Brown M, Williamson C, Tomasello M (2002) The domestication of social cognition in dogs. Science 298(5598):1634–1636PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Hare B, Rosati A, Kaminski J, Bräuer J, Call J, Tomasello M (2009) The domestication hypothesis for dogs’ skills with human communication: a response to Udell et al. (2008) and Wynne et al. (2008). Anim Behav 79:e1–e6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Hasher L, Zacks RT (1979) Automatic and effortful processes in memory. J Exp Psychol Gen 108(3):356–388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Hecht J, Rice ES (2014) Citizen science in canine science. J Vet Behav 9(6):e15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Hecht J, Rice ES (2015) Citizen science: a new direction in canine behavior research. Behav Proc 110:125–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Helton WS (2010) Does perceived trainability of dog (Canis lupus familiaris) breeds reflect differences in learning or differences in physical ability? Behav Proc 83:315–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Hutchison KA (2007) Attentional control and the relatedness proportion effect in semantic priming. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 33(4):645–662PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Hutchison KA (2011) Attentional control and the relatedness proportion effect in semantic priming. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 33(4):645–662CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Hutchison KA, Bugg JM, Lim YB, Olsen MR (2016) Congruency precues moderate item-specific proportion congruency effects. Atten Percept Psychophys 78(4):1087–1103PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Inzlicht M, Schmeichel BJ (2012) What is ego depletion? Toward a mechanistic revision of the resource model of self-control. Perspect Psychol Sci 7(5):450–463PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. James W (1890) The principles of psychology. Holt, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Jurado MB, Rosselli M (2007) The elusive nature of executive functions: a review of our current understanding. Neuropsychol Rev 17(3):213–233PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Kane MJ, Engle RW (2000) Working-memory capacity, proactive interference, and divided attention: limits on long-term memory retrieval. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 26(2):336–358PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Kane MJ, Engle RW (2003) Working-memory capacity and the control of attention: the contributions of goal neglect, response competition, and task set to Stroop performance. J Exp Psychol Gen 132(1):47–70PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Keppel G, Underwood BJ (1962) Proactive inhibition in short-term retention of single items. J Verbal Learn Verbal Behav 1(3):153–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Kis A, Topál J, Gácsi M, Range F, Huber L, Miklósi Á, Virányi Z (2012) Does the A-not-B error in adult pet dogs indicate sensitivity to human communication? Anim Cogn 15(4):737–743PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Kruska D (1988) Mammalian domestication and its effect on brain structure and behavior. Intelligence and evolutionary biology. Springer, Berlin, pp 211–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Kubota K, Niki H (1971) Prefrontal cortical unit activity and delayed cortical unit activity and delayed alternation performance in monkeys. J Neurophysiol 34:337–347PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Lai ZC, Moss MB, Killiany RJ, Rosene DL, Herndon JG (1995) Executive system dysfunction in the aged monkey: spatial and object reversal learning. Neurobiol Aging 16(6):947–954PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Landsberg GM, Hunthausen W, Ackerman L (2003) The effects of aging on the behavior of senior pets. Handbook of Behavior Problems of the Dog and Cat, 2nd edn. WB Saunders, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  81. Landsberg GM, Nichol J, Araujo JA (2012) Cognitive dysfunction syndrome: a disease of canine and feline brain aging. Vet Clin N Am Small Anim Pract 42:749–768CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Lazarowski L, Foster ML, Gruen ME, Sherman BL, Case BC, Fish RE, Milgram NW, Dorman DC (2014) Acquisition of a visual discrimination and reversal learning task by Labrador retrievers. Anim Cogn 17(3):787–792PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Lee CS, Therriault DJ (2013) The cognitive underpinnings of creative thought: a latent variable analysis exploring the roles of intelligence and working memory in three creative thinking processes. Intelligence 41:306–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Lepper M, Kass PH, Hart LA (2002) Prediction of adoption versus euthanasia among dogs and cats in a California animal shelter. J Appl Anim Welfare Sci 5(1):29–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Ley J, Bennett P, Coleman G (2008) Personality dimensions that emerge in companion canines. Appl Anim Behav Sci 110:305–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Lockman JJ (1984) The development of detour ability during infancy. Child Dev 55(2):482–491PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. MacLean EL, Hare B, Nunn CL, Addessi E, Amici F, Anderson RC, Zhao Y et al (2014) The evolution of self-control. Proc Natl Acad Sci 111(20):E2140–E2148.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.13235333111 PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Marshall-Pescini S, Valsecchi P, Petak I, Accorsi PA, Previde EP (2008) Does training make you smarter? The effects of training on dogs’ performance (Canis familiaris) in a problem-solving task. Behav Proc 78:449–454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Marshall-Pescini S, Passalacqua C, Barnard S, Valsecchi P, Prato-Previde E (2009) Agility and search and rescue training differently affects pet dogs’ behaviour in socio-cognitive tasks. Behav Proc 81(3):416–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Marshall-Pescini S, Virányi Z, Range F (2015) The effect of domestication on inhibitory control: wolves and dogs compared. PLoS ONE 10(2):e0118469PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Marshall-Pescini S, Frazzi C, Valsecchi P (2016) The effect of training and breed group on problem-solving behaviours in dogs. Anim Cogn 19:571–579PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Mech DL (2000) Leadership in wolf, Canis lupus, packs. Can Field Nat 114(2):259–263Google Scholar
  93. Merritt M (2015) Dismantling standard cognitive science: it’s time the dog has its day. Biol Philos 30:811–829CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Miklósi Á, Kubinyi E, Topál J, Gácsi M, Virányi Z, Csányi V (2003) A simple reason for a big difference: wolves do not look back at humans, but dogs do. Curr Biol 13(9):763–766PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Milgram NW (2003) Cognitive experience and its effect on age-dependent cognitive decline in beagle dogs. Neurochem Res 28(11):1677–1682PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Milgram NW, Zicker SC, Head E, Muggenburg BA, Murphey H, Ikeda-Douglas CJ, Cotman CW (2002) Dietary enrichment counteracts age-associated cognitive dysfunction in canines. Neurobiol Aging 23:737–745PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Milgram NW, Head E, Zicker SC, Ikeda-Douglas CJ, Murphey H, Muggenburg B, Siwak C, Tapp D, Cotman CW (2005) Learning ability in aged beagle dogs is preserved by behavioral enrichment and dietary fortification: a two-year longitudinal study. Neurobiol Aging 26:77–90PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Miller EK, Cohen JD (2001) An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. Ann Rev Neurosci 24:167–202PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Miller EK, Erickson CA, Desimone R (1996) Neural mechanisms of visual working memory in prefrontal cortex of the macaque. J Neurosci 16(16):5154–5167PubMedGoogle Scholar
  100. Miller HC, Pattison KF, DeWall CN, Rayburn-Reeves R, Zentall TR (2010) Self-control without a “self”? Common self-control processes in humans and dogs. Psychol Sci 21(4):534–538PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Miller HC, DeWall CN, Pattison K, Molet M, Zentall TR (2012) Too dog tired to avoid danger: self- control depletion in canines increases behavioral approach toward an aggressive threat. Psychon Bull Rev 19:535–540PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Mirkó E, Kubinyi E, Gácsi M, Miklósi Á (2012) Preliminary analysis of an adjective-based dog personality questionnaire developed to measure some aspects of personality in the domestic dog (Canis familiaris). Appl Anim Behav Sci 138:88–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Mischel W, Shoda Y, Rodriguez M (1989) Delay of gratification in children. Science 244:933–938PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Miyake A, Friedman NP, Emerson MJ, Witzki AH, Howerter A, Wager TD (2000) The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “frontal lobe” tasks: a latent variable analysis. Cogn Psychol 41:49–100PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Moffitt TE, Arsenault L, Belsky D, Dickson N, Hancox RJ, Harrington HL, Caspi A (2011) A gradient of childhood self-control predicts health, wealth, and public safety. Proc Natl Acad Sci 108(7):2693–2698PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Moffitt TE, Houts R, Asherson P, Belsky DW, Corcoran DL, Hammerle M, Caspi A (2015) Is adult ADHD a childhood-onset neurodevelopmental disorder? Evidence from a four-decade longitudinal cohort study. Am J Psychiatry 172:967–977PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Mongillo P, Araujo JA, Pitteri E, Carnier P, Adamelli S, Regolin L, Marinelli L (2013) Spatial reversal learning is impaired by age in pet dogs. Age 35:2273–2282PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Müller CA, Riemer S, Virányi Z, Huber L, Range F (2016) Inhibitory control, but not prolonged object- related experience appears to affect physical problem-solving performance of pet dogs. PLoS ONE 11(2):e0147753.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0147753 PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Nigg JT (2001) Is ADHD a disinhibitory disorder? Psychol Bull 127(5):571–598PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Norman DA, Shallice T (1986) Attention to action: willed and automatic control of behavior. In: Davidson R, Schwartz RG, Shapiro D (eds) Consciousness and self-regulation: advances in research and theory. Plenum Press, New York, pp 1–18Google Scholar
  111. Partala T, Surakka V (2003) Pupil size variation as an indication of affective processing. Int J Hum Comput Stud 59:185–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Peavler WS (1974) Pupil size, information overload, and performance differences. Psychophysiology 11(5):559–566PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Pennington BF, Ozonoff S (1996) Executive functions and developmental psychopathology. J Child Psychol 37(1):51–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Péter A, Gergely A, Topál J, Miklósi Á, Pongrácz P (2015) A simple but powerful test of perseverative search in dogs and toddlers. Q J Exp Psychol 68(5):940–951CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Peterson LR, Peterson MJ (1959) Short-term retention of individual verbal items. J Exp Psychol 58(3):192–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Piaget J (1954) The Construction of Reality in the Child. Basic, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Pongrácz P, Miklósi Á, Vida V, Csányi V (2005) The pet dog’s ability for learning from a human demonstrator in a detour task is independent from the breed and age. Appl Anim Behav Sci 90:309–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Range F, Virányi Z (2015) Tracking the evolutionary origins of dog-human cooperation: the “Canine Cooperation Hypothesis”. Front Psychol 5:1582PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Redick TS, Shipstead Z, Wiemers EA, Melby-Lervag M, Hulme C (2015) What’s working in working memory training? An educational perspective. Edu Psychol Rev 27(4):617–633CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Riemer S, Mills DS, Wright H (2014) Impulsive for life? The nature of long-term impulsivity in domestic dogs. Anim Cogn 17(3):815–819PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. Rørvang MV, Ahrendt LP, Christensen JW (2015) Horses fail to use social learning when solving spatial detour tasks. Anim Cogn 18(4):847–854PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. Rossi A, Smedema D, Parada FJ, Allen C (2014) Visual attention in dogs and the evolution of non-verbal communication. In: Horowitz A (ed) Domestic dog cognition and behavior. Springer Verlag, Berlin, pp 133–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Rueda MR, Rothbart MK, McCandliss BD, Saccomanno L, Posner MI (2005) Training, maturation, and genetic influences on the development of executive function. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102(41):14931–14936PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. Ruehl WW, Bruyette DS, DePaoli A, Cotman CW, Head E, Milgram NW, Cummings BJ (1995) Canine cognitive dysfunction as a model for human age-related cognitive decline, dementia and Alzheimer’s disease: clinical presentation, cognitive testing, pathology and response to 1-deprenyl therapy. Prog Brain Res 106:217–225PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. Salman MD, New JG Jr, Scarlett JM, Kass PH, Ruch-Gallie R, Hetts S (1998) Human and animal factors related to relinquishment of dogs and cats in 12 selected animal shelters in the United States. J Appl Anim Welfare Sci 1(3):207–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. Salman MD, Hutchison J, Ruch-Gallie R, Kogan L, New JC, Hass PH, Scarlett JM (2000) Behavioral reasons for relinquishment of dogs and cats to 12 shelters. J Appl Anim Welfare Sci 3(2):93–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  127. Schleidt WM, Shalter MD (2003) Co-evolution of humans and canids: an alternative view of dog domestication: homo homini lupus? Evol Cognit 9(1):57–72Google Scholar
  128. Schneider W, Shiffrin RM (1977) Controlled and automatic human information processing: detection, search, and attention. Psychol Rev 84(1):1–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  129. Shipstead Z, Lindsey DRB, Marshall RL, Engle RW (2014) The mechanisms of working memory capacity: primary memory, secondary memory, and attention control. J Mem Lang 72:116–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  130. Smith BP, Litchfield CA (2010) How well do dingoes, Canis dingo, perform on the detour task? Anim Behav 80:155–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  131. Somppi S, Tӧrnqvist H, Hänninen L, Krause C, Vainio O (2012) Dogs do look at images: eye tracking in canine cognition research. Anim Cogn 15:163–174PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  132. Somppi S, Tӧrnqvist H, Hänninen L, Krause CM, Vainio O (2014) How dogs scan familiar and inverted faces: an eye movement study. Anim Cogn 17:793–803PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  133. Somppi S, Tӧrnqvist H, Kujala MV, Hänninen L, Krause CM, Vainio O (2016) Dogs evaluate threatening facial expressions by their biological validity – evidence from gazing patterns. PLoS ONE 11(1):e0143047.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143047 PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  134. Somppi S, Tӧrnqvist H, Topál J, Koskela A, Hänninen L, Krause CM, Vainio O (2017) Nasal oxytocin treatment biases dogs’ visual attention and emotional response toward positive human facial expressions. Front Psychol 8:1854.  https://doi.org/10.3380/fpsyg.2017.01854 PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  135. Spieler DH, Balota DA, Faust ME (1996) Stroop performance in healthy younger and older adults and in individuals with dementia of the Alzheimer’s type. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 22(2):461–479PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  136. Sprague J, Verona E, Kalkhoff W, Kilmer A (2011) Moderators and mediators of the stress-aggression relationship: executive function and state anger. Emotion 11(1):61–73PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  137. Stewart L, MacLean EL, Ivy D, Woods V, Cohen E, Hare B (2015) Citizen science as a new tool in dog cognition research. PLoS ONE 10(9):e0135176.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0135176 PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  138. Sümegi Z, Kis A, Miklósi Á, Topál J (2014) Why do adult dogs (Canis familiaris) commit the A-not-B search error? J Comp Psychol 128(1):21PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  139. Tangney JP, Baumeister RF, Boone AL (2004) High self-control predicts good adjustment, less pathology, better grades, and interpersonal success. J Pers 72(2):271–324PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  140. Tapp PD, Siwak CT, Estrada J, Head E, Muggenburg BA, Cotman CW, Milgram NW (2003) Size and reversal learning in the beagle dog as a measure of executive function and inhibitory control in aging. Learn Memory 10:64–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  141. Téglás E, Gergely A, Kupán K, Miklósi Á, Topál J (2012) Dogs’ gaze following is tuned to human communicative signals. Curr Biol 22(3):209–212PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  142. Thompkins AM, Deshpande G, Waggoner P, Katz JS (2016) Functional magnetic resonance imaging of the domestic dog: research, methodology, and conceptual issues. Comp Cognit Behav Rev 11:63–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  143. Tinbergen N (1963) On aims and methods of ethology. Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie 20:410–433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  144. Topál J, Gergely G, Miklósi Á, Erdӧhegyi Á, Csibra G (2008) Infants’ perseverative search errors are induced by pragmatic misinterpretation. Science 321(5897):1831–1834PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  145. Topál J, Gergely G, Erdӧhegyi Á, Csibra G, Miklósi Á (2009) Differential sensitivity to human communication in dogs, wolves, and human infants. Science 325(5945):1269–1272PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  146. Topál J, Kis A, Oláh K (2014) Dogs’ sensitivity to human ostensive cues: a unique adaptation. The social dog: behavior and cognition 319–346Google Scholar
  147. Tóth L, Gácsi M, Miklósi Á, Bogner P, Repa I (2009) Awake dog brain magnetic resonance imaging. J Vet Behav 4(2):50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  148. Turner ML, Engle RW (1989) Is working memory capacity task dependent? J Mem Lang 28:127–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  149. Udell MAR, Dorey NR, Wynne CDL (2008) Wolves outperform dogs in following human social cues. Anim Behav 76(6):1767–1773CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  150. Udell MAR, Dorey NR, Wynne CDL (2010a) What did domestication do to dogs? A new account of dogs’ sensitivity to human actions. Biol Rev 85:327–345PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  151. Udell MAR, Dorey NR, Wynne CDL (2010b) The performance of stray dogs (Canis familiaris) living in a shelter on human-guided object-choice tasks. Anim Behav 79(3):717–725CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  152. Udell MA, Ewald M, Dorey NR, Wynne CD (2014) Exploring breed differences in dogs (Canis familiaris): does exaggeration or inhibition of predatory response predict performance on human-guided tasks? Anim Behav 89:99–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  153. Unsworth N, Engle RW (2007) The nature of individual differences in working memory capacity: active maintenance in primary memory and controlled search from secondary memory. Psychol Rev 114(1):104–132PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  154. Unsworth N, Fukuda K, Awh E, Vogel EK (2014) Working memory and fluid intelligence: capacity, attention, control, and secondary memory retrieval. Cogn Psychol 71:1–26PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  155. Uzgiris IC, Hunt JM (1975) Assessment in infancy: Ordinal scales of psychological development. University of Illinois Press, ChampaignGoogle Scholar
  156. Vás J, Topál J, Péch É, Miklósi Á (2007) Measuring attention deficit and activity in dogs: a new application and validation of a human ADHD questionnaire. Appl Anim Behav Sci 103:105–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  157. Virányi Z, Gácsi M, Kubinyi E, Topál J, Belényi B, Ujfalussy D, Miklósi Á (2008) Comprehension of human pointing gestures in young human-reared wolves (Canis lupus) and dogs (Canis familiaris). Anim Cogn 11:373–387PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  158. Wallis JD, Dias R, Robbins TW, Roberts AC (2001) Dissociable contributions of the orbitofrontal and lateral prefrontal cortex of the marmoset to performance on a detour reaching task. Eur J Neurosci 13(9):1797–1808PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  159. Wallis LJ, Range F, Müller CA, Serisier S, Huber L, Virányi Z (2014) Lifespan development of attentiveness in domestic dogs: drawing parallels with humans. Frontiers in Psychology 5(71):1–13Google Scholar
  160. Wallis LJ, Virányi Z, Müller CA, Serisier S, Huber L, Range F (2016) Aging effects on discrimination learning, logical reasoning and memory in pet dogs. Age 38(1):6PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  161. Williams FJ, Mills DS, Guo K (2011) Development of a head-mounted, eye-tracking system for dog. J Neurosci Methods 194(2):259–265PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  162. Wright HF, Mills DS, Pollux PMJ (2011) Development and validation of a psychometric tool for assessing impulsivity in the domestic dog Canis familiaris. Int J Comp Psychol 24:210–225Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Montana State UniversityBozemanUSA

Personalised recommendations