Interspecies transmission of emotional information via chemosignals: from humans to dogs (Canis lupus familiaris)

  • Biagio D’Aniello
  • Gün Refik Semin
  • Alessandra Alterisio
  • Massimo Aria
  • Anna Scandurra
Original Paper

Abstract

We report a study examining interspecies emotion transfer via body odors (chemosignals). Do human body odors (chemosignals) produced under emotional conditions of happiness and fear provide information that is detectable by pet dogs (Labrador and Golden retrievers)? The odor samples were collected from the axilla of male donors not involved in the main experiment. The experimental setup involved the co-presence of the dog’s owner, a stranger and the odor dispenser in a space where the dogs could move freely. There were three odor conditions [fear, happiness, and control (no sweat)] to which the dogs were assigned randomly. The dependent variables were the relevant behaviors of the dogs (e.g., approaching, interacting and gazing) directed to the three targets (owner, stranger, sweat dispenser) aside from the dogs’ stress and heart rate indicators. The results indicated with high accuracy that the dogs manifested the predicted behaviors in the three conditions. There were fewer and shorter owner directed behaviors and more stranger directed behaviors when they were in the “happy odor condition” compared to the fear odor and control conditions. In the fear odor condition, they displayed more stressful behaviors. The heart rate data in the control and happy conditions were significantly lower than in the fear condition. Our findings suggest that interspecies emotional communication is facilitated by chemosignals.

Keywords

Dogs Human emotional smell Interspecies emotional transfer Emotional communication Dog’s heart rate Dog–human bond 

References

  1. Ainsworth MDS, Bell SM (1970) Attachment, exploration, and separation: illustrated by the behavior of one-year-olds in a strange situation. Child Dev 41:49–67CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Albuquerque N, Guo K, Wilkinson A, Savalli C, Otta E, Mills D (2016) Dogs recognize dog and human emotions. Biol Lett 12:20150883CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Ashida S (1972) Development changes in the basal and evoked heart rate in neonatal rats. J Comp Physiol Psych 78:368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baldock NM, Sibly RM, Penning PD (1988) Behavior and seasonal variation in heart rate in domestic sheep, Ovis aries. Anim Behav 36:35–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bekoff M (2007) The emotional lives of animals: a leading scientist explores animal joy, sorrow, and empathy-and why they matter. New World Library, NovatoGoogle Scholar
  6. Berns GS, Brooks AM, Spivak M (2012) Functional MRI in awake unrestrained dogs. PLoS ONE 7:e38027CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Berns GS, Brooks AM, Spivak M (2013) Replicability and heterogeneity of awake unrestrained canine fMRI responses. PLoS ONE 8:e81698CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Berns GS, Brooks AM, Spivak M (2015) Scent of the familiar: an fMRI study of canine brain responses to familiar and unfamiliar human and dog odors. Behav Process 110:37–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Candland DK, Taylor DB, Dresdale L, Leiphart JM, Solow SP (1969) Heart rate, aggression, and dominance in the domestic chicken. J Comp Physiol Psychol 67:70CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Custance D, Mayer J (2012) Empathic-like responding by domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) to distress in humans: an exploratory study. Anim Cogn 15:851–859CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. D’Aniello B, Scandurra A (2016) Ontogenetic effects on gazing behavior: a case study of kennel dogs (Labrador retrievers) in the impossible task paradigm. Anim Cogn 19:565–570CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. D’Aniello B, Scandurra A, Prato-Previde E, Valsecchi P (2015) Gazing toward humans: a study on water rescue dogs using the impossible task paradigm. Behav Process 110:68–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. D’Aniello B, Scandurra A, Alterisio A, Valsecchi P, Prato-Previde E (2016a) The importance of gestural communication: a study of human–dog communication using incongruent information. Anim Cogn 19:1231–1235CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. D’Aniello B, Polese G, Luongo L, Scandurra A, Magliozzi L, Aria M, Pinelli C (2016b) Neuroanatomical relationships between FMRF-amide-immunoreactive components of the nervus terminalis and the topology of olfactory bulbs in teleost fish. Cell Tissue Res 364:43–57CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. D’Aniello B, Alterisio A, Scandurra A, Petremolo E, Iommelli MR, Aria M (2017) What’s the point? Golden and Labrador retrievers living in kennels do not understand human pointing gestures. Anim Cogn 20:777–787CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Dantzer R, Baldwin BA (1974) Changes in heart rate during suppression of operant responding in pigs. Physiol Behav 12:385–391CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. de Groot JH, Smeets MA, Kaldewaij A, Duijndam MJ, Semin GR (2012) Chemosignals communicate human emotions. Psychol Sci 23:1417–1424CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. de Groot JH, Smeets MA, Rowson MJ, Bulsing PJ, Blonk CG, Wilkinson JE, Semin GR (2015) A sniff of happiness. Psychol Sci 26:684–700CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. de Groot JH, Semin GR, Smeets MA (2017) On the communicative function of body odors: a theoretical integration and review. Perspect Psychol Sci 12:306–324CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Deputte BL, Doll A (2011) Do dogs understand human facial expressions? J Vet Behav 6:78–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Eisermann K (1992) Long-term heart rate responses to social stress in wild European rabbits: predominant effect of rank position. Physiol Behav 52:33–36CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Essner A, Sjöström R, Ahlgren E, Lindmark B (2013) Validity and reliability of Polar® RS800CX heart rate monitor, measuring heart rate in dogs during standing position and at trot on a treadmill. Physiol Behav 114:1–5CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Fox MW, Andrews RV (1973) Physiological and biochemical correlates of individual differences in behavior of wolf cubs. Behavior 46:129–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fukuzawa M, Mills DS, Cooper JJ (2005) More than just a word: non-semantic command variables affect obedience in the domestic dog (Canis familiaris). Appl Anim Behav Sci 91:129–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gácsi M, Gyoöri B, Virányi Z, Kubinyi E, Range F, Belényi B, Miklósi Á (2009) Explaining dog wolf differences in utilizing human pointing gestures: selection for synergistic shifts in the development of some social skills. PLoS ONE 4:e6584CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Hamilton J, Vonk J (2015) Do dogs (Canis lupus familiaris) prefer family? Behav Process 119:123–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hare B, Tomasello M (2005) Human-like social skills in dogs? Trends Cogn Sci 9:439–444CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Hare B, Brown M, Williamson C, Tomasello M (2002) The domestication of social cognition in dogs. Science 298:1634–1636CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Hepper PG (1988) The discrimination of human odor by the dog. Perception 17:549–554CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Huber A, Barber AL, Faragó T, Müller CA, Huber L (2017) Investigating emotional contagion in dogs (Canis familiaris) to emotional sounds of humans and conspecifics. Anim Cogn 20:703–715CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Izuma K, Saito DN, Sadato N (2008) Processing of social and monetary rewards in the human striatum. Neuron 58:284–294CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Jacob S, McClintock MK, Zelano B, Ober C (2002) Paternally inherited HLA alleles are associated with women’s choice of male odor. Nat Genet 30:175–179CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Jonckheer-Sheehy VS, Vinke CM, Ortolani A (2012) Validation of a Polar® human heart rate monitor for measuring heart rate and heart rate variability in adult dogs under stationary conditions. J Vet Behav 7:205–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Knutson B, Adams CM, Fong GW, Hommer D (2001) Anticipation of increasing monetary reward selectively recruits nucleus accumbens. J Neurosci 21:RC159PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. MacLean EL, Herrmann E, Suchindran S, Hare B (2017) Individual differences in cooperative communicative skills are more similar between dogs and humans than chimpanzees. Anim Behav 126:41–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Marshall DA, Moulton DG (1981) Olfactory sensitivity to α-ionone in humans and dogs. Chem Senses 6:53–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. McClintock MK (2000) Human pheromones: primers, releasers, signalers, or modulators? In: Wallen K, Schneider JE (eds) Reproduction in context. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 355–420Google Scholar
  38. Merola I, Prato-Previde E, Marshall-Pescini S (2012) Social referencing in dog–owner dyads? Anim Cogn 15:175–185CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Merola I, Marshall-Pescini S, D’Aniello B, Prato-Previde E (2013) Social referencing: water rescue trained dogs are less affected than pet dogs by the stranger’s message. Appl Anim Behav Sci 147:132–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Miklósi Á (2007) Human–animal interactions and social cognition in dogs. In: Jensen P (ed) The behavioral biology of dogs. CAB International, Wallingford, pp 205–222Google Scholar
  41. Miklósi Á, Topál J (2013) What does it take to become ‘best friends’? Evolutionary changes in canine social competence. Trends Cogn Sci 17:287–294CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Mitro S, Gordon AR, Olsson MJ, Lundström JN (2012) The smell of age: perception and discrimination of body odors of different ages. PLoS ONE 7:e38110CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  43. Montague PR, Berns GS (2002) Neural economics and the biological substrates of valuation. Neuron 36:265–284CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Morisaki A, Takaoka A, Fujita K (2009) Are dogs sensitive to the emotional state of humans? J Vet Behav 4:49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Mujica-Parodi LR, Strey HH, Frederick B, Savoy R, Cox D, Botanov Y, Tolkunov D, Rubin D, Weber J (2009) Chemosensory cues to conspecific emotional stress activate amygdala in humans. PLoS ONE 4:e6415CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  46. Mutic S, Parma V, Brünner YF, Freiherr J (2015) You smell dangerous: communicating fight responses through human chemosignals of aggression. Chem Senses 41:35–43CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Nagasawa M, Murai K, Mogi K, Kikusui T (2011) Dogs can discriminate human smiling faces from blank expressions. Anim Cogn 14:525–533CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Nelson NL, Russell JA (2013) Universality revisited. Emot Rev 5:8–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Palestrini C, Prato-Previde E, Spiezio C, Verga M (2005) Heart rate and behavioral responses of dogs in the Ainsworth’s strange situation: a pilot study. Appl Anim Behav Sci 94:75–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Palmer R, Custance D (2008) A counterbalanced version of Ainsworth’s strange situation procedure reveals secure-base effects in dog–human relationships. Appl Anim Behav Sci 109:306–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Panksepp J (2004) Affective neuroscience: the foundations of human and animal emotions. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  52. Pause BM (2012) Processing of body odor signals by the human brain. Chemosens Percept 5:55–63CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Penn DJ, Oberzauche E, Grammer K, Fischer G, Soini HA, Wiesler D, Novotny MV, Novotny MV, Dixon SJ, Xu Y, Brereton RG (2007) Individual and gender fingerprints in human body odor. J R Soc Interface 4:331–340CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Pinelli C, Rastogi RK, Scandurra A, Jadhao AG, Aria M, D’Aniello B (2014) A comparative cluster analysis of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) diaphorase histochemistry in the brains of amphibians. J Comp Neurol 522:2980–3003CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Pongrácz P, Molnár C, Miklósi Á (2009) Dog barking: a specific way of dog–human communication. J Vet Behav 4:54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Prato-Previde E, Custance DM, Spiezio C, Sabatini F (2003) Is the dog–human relationship an attachment bond? An observational study using Ainsworth’s strange situation. Behavior 140:225–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Prehn A, Ohrt A, Sojka B, Ferstl R, Pause BM (2006) Chemosensory anxiety signals augment the startle reflex in humans. Neurosci Lett 394:127–130CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Racca A, Guo K, Meints K, Mills DS (2012) Reading faces: differential lateral gaze bias in processing canine and human facial expressions in dogs and 4-year-old children. PLoS ONE 7:e36076CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  59. Rehn T, McGowan RT, Keeling LJ (2013) Evaluating the strange situation procedure (SSP) to assess the bond between dogs and humans. PLoS ONE 8:e56938CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  60. Rilling JK, Gutman DA, Zeh TR, Pagnoni G, Berns GS, Kilts CD (2002) A neural basis for social cooperation. Neuron 35:395–405CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Scandurra A, Prato-Previde E, Valsecchi P, Aria M, D’Aniello B (2015) Guide dogs as a model for investigating the effect of life experience and training on gazing behavior. Anim Cogn 18:937–944CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Scandurra A, Alterisio A, D’Aniello B (2016) Behavioral effects of training on water rescue dogs in the Strange Situation Test. Appl Anim Behav Sci 174:121–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Scandurra A, Alterisio A, Marinelli L, Mongillo P, Semin GR, D’Aniello B (2017) Effectiveness of verbal and gestural signals and familiarity with signal-senders on the performance of working dogs. Appl Anim Behav Sci 191:78–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Schoon GA, De Bruin JC (1994) The ability of dogs to recognize and cross-match human odors. Forensic Sci Int 69:111–118CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Schultz W, Dayan P, Montague PR (1997) A neural substrate of prediction and reward. Science 275:1593–1599CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Semin GR (2007) Grounding communication: Synchrony. In: Kruglanski AW, Higgins ET (eds) Social psychology: handbook of basic principles. Guilford Press, New York, pp 630–649Google Scholar
  67. Semin GR, de Groot JH (2013) The chemical bases of human sociality. Trends Cogn Sci 17:427–429CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Siniscalchi M, Sasso R, Pepe AM, Dimatteo S, Vallortigara G, Quaranta A (2011) Sniffing with the right nostril: lateralization of response to odor stimuli by dogs. Anim Behav 82:399–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Siniscalchi M, Pergola G, Quaranta A (2013) Detour behavior in attack-trained dogs: left-turners perform better than right-turners. Laterality 18:282–293CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Siniscalchi M, d’Ingeo S, Quaranta A (2016) The dog nose “KNOWS” fear: asymmetric nostril use during sniffing at canine and human emotional stimuli. Behav Brain Res 304:34–41CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Stevenson RJ (2009) The psychology of flavour. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Sümegi Z, Oláh K, Topál J (2014) Emotional contagion in dogs as measured by change in cognitive task performance. Appl Anim Behav Sci 160:106–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Svartberg K (2006) Breed-typical behavior in dogs—historical remnants or recent constructs? Appl Anim Behav Sci 96:293–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Tarvainen MP, Niskanen JP, Lipponen JA, Ranta-Aho PO, Karjalainen PA (2014) Kubios HRV–heart rate variability analysis software. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 113:210–220CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. Thesen A, Steen JB, Doving KB (1993) Behavior of dogs during olfactory tracking. J Exp Biol 180:247–251PubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. Topál J, Miklósi Á, Csányi V, Dóka A (1998) Attachment behavior in dogs (Canis familiaris): a new application of Ainsworth’s (1969) Strange Situation Test. J Comp Psychol 112:219CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. Topál J, Gergely G, Erdőhegyi Á, Csibra G, Miklósi Á (2009) Differential sensitivity to human communication in dogs, wolves, and human infants. Science 325:1269–1272CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. Udell MA, Brubaker L (2016) Are dogs social generalists? Canine social cognition, attachment, and the dog–human bond. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 25:327–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Udell MA, Wynne CD (2008) A review of domestic dogs’ (Canis familiaris) human-like behaviors: or why behavior analysts should stop worrying and love their dogs. J Exp Anal Behav 89:247–261CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  80. Udell MA, Wynne CD (2010) Ontogeny and phylogeny: both are essential to human-sensitive behavior in the genus Canis. Anim Behav 79:e9–e14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Udell MA, Dorey NR, Wynne CD (2010) What did domestication do to dogs? A new account of dogs’ sensitivity to human actions. Biol Rev 85:327–345CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. Van der Ploeg HM (1980) Validity of the Zelf-Beoordelings-Vragenlijst (A Dutch version of the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory). Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 35:243–249Google Scholar
  83. Weisbard C, Graham FK (1971) Heart-rate change as a component of the orienting response in monkeys. J Comp Physiol Psychol 76:74CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. Wyatt TD (2015) How animals communicate via pheromones. Am Sci 103:114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Wynne CD, Udell MA, Lord KA (2008) Ontogeny’s impacts on human–dog communication. Anim Behav 76:e1–e4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Yong MH, Ruffman T (2014) Emotional contagion: dogs and humans show a similar physiological response to human infant crying. Behav Process 108:155–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Zahn-Waxler C, Hollenbeck B, Radke-Yarrow M (1984) The origins of empathy and altruism. In: Fox MW, Mickley LD (eds) Advances in animal welfare science. Kluwer Academic, Norwell, pp 21–41Google Scholar
  88. Zhou W, Chen D (2009) Fear-related chemosignals modulate recognition of fear in ambiguous facial expressions. Psychol Sci 20:177–183CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of BiologyUniversity of Naples “Federico II”NaplesItaly
  2. 2.William James Center for ResearchISPA - Instituto UniversitárioLisbonPortugal
  3. 3.Department of Economics and StatisticsUniversity of Naples “Federico II”NaplesItaly

Personalised recommendations