Can but don’t: olfactory discrimination between own and alien offspring in the domestic cat

Abstract

Mammalian maternal care usually comes at a large energetic cost. To maximize their fitness, mothers should preferentially care for their own offspring. However, the majority of studies of mother–offspring recognition have focused on herd- or colony-living species and there is little information on maternal discrimination in more solitary-living species. Olfaction has been found to play a major role in mother–offspring recognition across various taxa. Therefore, our aim was to study this in a species evolved from a solitary-living ancestor, the domestic cat. We asked whether cat mothers distinguish between their own and alien offspring when providing maternal care, and whether cat mothers use olfactory cues in the offspring discrimination process. Results of Experiment 1 showed that cat mothers do not discriminate between own and alien young when retrieving them to the nest. They treated own and alien young similarly with respect to latency and order of retrieval. However, the results of Experiments 2 and 3, where we used an olfactory habituation-discrimination technique, showed that mothers were able to distinguish between the odours of their own and alien kittens. We discuss what ecological and/or behavioural factors might influence a mother’s decision when faced with discriminating between own and alien young, and why mothers might not discriminate between them when they are able to do so. Our findings support the view that maternal care alone should not be used as a measure of offspring recognition, and equal maternal care of own and alien young should not be immediately interpreted as an inability to discriminate between them.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  1. Andersen IL, Nævdal E, Bøe KE (2011) Maternal investment, sibling competition, and offspring survival with increasing litter size and parity in pigs (Sus scrofa). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 65:1159–1167. doi:10.1007/s00265-010-1128-4

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Bates D, Mächler M, Bolker B, Walker S (2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J Stat Softw 67:1–48. doi:10.18637/jss.v067.i01

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bateson P (1983) Optimal outbreeding. In: Bateson P (ed) Mate Choice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 257–277

    Google Scholar 

  4. Beecher MD (1991) Successes and failures of parent-offspring recognition in animals. In: Hepper PG (ed) Kin recognition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 94–124

    Google Scholar 

  5. Clutton-Brock TH, Albon SD, Guinness FE (1989) Fitness costs of gestation and lactation in wild mammals. Nature 337:260–262. doi:10.1038/337260a0

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. De Pisapia N, Bornstein MH, Rigo P, Esposito G, De Falco S, Venuti P (2013) Gender differences in directional brain responses to infant hunger cries. NeuroReport 24:142. doi:10.1097/WNR.0b013e32835df4fa

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Deag JM, Lawrence CE, Manning A (1987) The consequences of differences in litter size for the nursing cat and her kittens. J Zool 213:153–179. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7998.1987.tb03687.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ebensperger LA, Hurtado MJ, Valdivia I (2006) Lactating females do not discriminate between their own young and unrelated pups in the communally breeding rodent, Octodon degus. Ethology 112:921–929. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0310.2006.01251.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ellis SLH et al (2013) AAFP and ISFM feline environmental needs guidelines. J Feline Med Surg 15:219–230. doi:10.1177/1098612X13477537

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Feldman HN (1993) Maternal care and differences in the use of nests in the domestic cat. Anim Behav 45:13–23. doi:10.1006/anbe.1993.1002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Feldman HN (1994) Methods of scent marking in the domestic cat. Can J Zool 72:1093–1099. doi:10.1139/z94-147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Fleming TH, Rauscher RJ (1978) On the evolution of litter size in Peromyscus leucopus. Evolution 32:45–55. doi:10.2307/2407409

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Fogden SCL (1971) Mother-young behaviour at Grey seal breeding beaches. J Zool 164:61–92. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7998.1971.tb01298.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Gittleman JL, Thompson SD (1988) Energy allocation in mammalian reproduction. Am Zool 28:863–875. doi:10.1093/icb/28.3.863

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Gustin MK, McCracken GF (1987) Scent recognition between females and pups in the bat Tadarida brasiliensis mexicana. Anim Behav 35:13–19. doi:10.1016/S0003-3472(87)80205-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hall VE, Pierce GN (1934) Litter size, birth weight and growth to weaning in the cat. Anat Rec 60:111–124. doi:10.1002/ar.1090600113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Halpin ZT (1986) Individual odors among mammals: origins and functions. Adv Study Behav 16:39–70. doi:10.1016/S0065-3454(08)60187-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hamilton WD (1964a) The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I. J Theor Biol 7:1–16. doi:10.1016/0022-5193(64)90038-4

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hamilton WD (1964b) The genetical evolution of social behaviour. II. J Theor Biol 7:17–52. doi:10.1016/0022-5193(64)90039-6

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hart BL, Hart LA (2013) Normal and problematic reproductive behaviour in the domestic cat. In: Turner DC, Bateson P (eds) The domestic cat: the biology of its behaviour. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 27–36

    Google Scholar 

  21. Härtel R (1975) Zur Struktur und Funktion akustischer Signale im Pflegesystem der Hauskatze (Felis catus L.). Biol Zentbl 94:187–204

    Google Scholar 

  22. Haskins R (1977) Effect of kitten vocalizations on maternal behavior. J Comp Physiol Psychol 91:830–838. doi:10.1037/h0077362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Haskins R (1979) A causal analysis of kitten vocalization: an observational and experimental study. Anim Behav 27:726–736. doi:10.1016/0003-3472(79)90008-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Hayes LD (2000) To nest communally or not to nest communally: a review of rodent communal nesting and nursing. Anim Behav 59:677–688. doi:10.1006/anbe.1999.1390

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Hayes LD, O’Bryant E, Christiansen AM, Solomon NG (2004) Temporal changes in mother–offspring discrimination in the prairie vole (Microtus ochrogaster). Ethol Ecol Evol 16:145–156. doi:10.1080/08927014.2004.9522643

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Hepper PG (1994) Long-term retention of kinship recognition established during infancy in the domestic dog. Behav Process 33:3–14. doi:10.1016/0376-6357(94)90056-6

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Hewlett BS, Winn S (2014) Allomaternal nursing in humans. Curr Anthropol 55:200–229. doi:10.1086/675657

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Holmes WG (1984) Ontogeny of dam–young recognition in captive Belding’s ground squirrels (Spermophilus beldingi). J Comp Psychol 98:246. doi:10.1037/0735-7036.98.3.246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Holmes WG, Mateo JM (2007) Kin recognition in rodents: issues and evidence. In: Wolff JO, Sherman PW (eds) Rodent societies: an ecological and evolutionary perspective. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 216–228

    Google Scholar 

  30. Horrell I, Bennett J (1981) Disruption of teat preferences and retardation of growth following cross-fostering of 1-week-old pigs. Anim Prod 33:99–106. doi:10.1017/S0003356100025253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Horrell I, Hodgson J (1992) The bases of sow-piglet identification. 1. The identification by sows of their own piglets and the presence of intruders. Appl Anim Behav Sci 33:319–327. doi:10.1016/S0168-1591(05)80069-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Houston-Price C, Nakai S (2004) Distinguishing novelty and familiarity effects in infant preference procedures. Infant Child Dev 13:341–348. doi:10.1002/icd.364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Hudson SJ, Mullord MM (1977) Investigations of maternal bonding in dairy cattle. Appl Anim Ethol 3:271–276. doi:10.1016/0304-3762(77)90008-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Hudson R, Raihani G, González D, Bautista A, Distel H (2009) Nipple preference and contests in suckling kittens of the domestic cat are unrelated to presumed nipple quality. Dev Psychobiol 51:322–332. doi:10.1002/dev.20371

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Hudson R, Rangassamy M, Saldaña A, Bánszegi O, Rödel HG (2015) Stable individual differences in separation calls during early development in cats and mice. Front Zool 12:S12. doi:10.1186/1742-9994-12-S1-S12

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Jemmett JE, Evans JM (1977) A survey of sexual behaviour and reproduction of female cats. J Small Anim Pract 18:31–37. doi:10.1111/j.1748-5827.1977.tb05821.x

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Jesseau SA, Holmes WG, Lee TM (2008) Mother–offspring recognition in communally nesting degus, Octodon degus. Anim Behav 75:573–582. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2007.06.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Jesseau SA, Holmes WG, Lee TM (2009) Communal nesting and discriminative nursing by captive degus, Octodon degus. Anim Behav 78:1183–1188. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.07.037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Kaitz M, Good A, Rokem AM, Eidelman AI (1987) Mothers’ recognition of their newborns by olfactory cues. Dev Psychobiol 20:587–591. doi:10.1002/dev.420200604

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Koivula M, Koskela E, Mappes T, Oksanen TA (2003) Cost of reproduction in the wild: manipulation of reproductive effort in the bank vole. Ecology 84:398–405. doi:10.1890/0012-9658(2003)084[0398:CORITW]2.0.CO;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. König B (2006) Non-offspring nursing in mammals: general implications from a case study on house mice. In: Kappeler PM, Schaik CP (eds) Cooperation in primates and humans. Springer, Berlin, pp 191–205. doi:10.1007/3-540-28277-7_11

    Google Scholar 

  42. König B, Riester J, Markl H (1988) Maternal care in house mice (Mus musculus): II. The energy cost of lactation as a function of litter size. J Zool 216:195–210. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7998.1988.tb02425.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Lawrence CE (1980) Individual differences in the mother-kitten relationship in the domestic cat (Felis catus). Dissertation, University of Edinburgh

  44. Lorberbaum JP et al (2002) A potential role for thalamocingulate circuitry in human maternal behavior. Biol Psychiatry 51:431–445. doi:10.1016/S0006-3223(01)01284-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. MacDonald DW, Apps PJ, Carr GM, Kerby G (1987) Social dynamics, nursing coalitions and infanticide among farm cats, Felis catus. Adv Ethol 28:1–66. doi:10.1016/0168-1591(88)90058-5

    Google Scholar 

  46. MacLeod KJ, Lukas D (2014) Revisiting non-offspring nursing: allonursing evolves when the costs are low. Biol Lett 10:20140378. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2014.0378

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Maletínská J, Špinka M, Víchová J, Stěhulová I (2002) Individual recognition of piglets by sows in the early post-partum period. Behaviour 139:975–991. doi:10.1163/156853902320387927

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Mappes T, Koskela E, Ylonen H (1995) Reproductive costs and litter size in the bank vole. Proc R Soc Lond (Biol) 261:19–24. doi:10.1098/rspb.1995.0111

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Mellen JD (1993) A comparative analysis of scent-marking, social and reproductive behavior in 20 species of small cats (Felis). Am Zool 33:151–166. doi:10.1093/icb/33.2.151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Murray AD (1979) Infant crying as an elicitor of parental behavior: an examination of two models. Psychol Bull 86:191–215. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.86.1.191

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Muul I (1970) Intra-and inter-familial behaviour of Glaucomys volans (Rodentia) following parturition. Anim Behav 18:20–25. doi:10.1016/0003-3472(70)90064-3

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Neuhaus P, Pelletier N (2001) Mortality in relation to season, age, sex, and reproduction in Columbian ground squirrels (Spermophilus columbianus). Can J Zool 79:465–470. doi:10.1139/z00-225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Newman JD (2007) Neural circuits underlying crying and cry responding in mammals. Behav Brain Res 182:155–165. doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2007.02.011

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Ohkawa N, Hidaka T (1987) Communal nursing in the domestic cat, Felis catus. J Ethol 5:173–183. doi:10.1007/BF02349950

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Ostermeyer MC, Elwood RW (1983) Pup recognition in Mus musculus: parental discrimination between their own and alien young. Dev Psychobiol 16:75–82. doi:10.1002/dev.420160202

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Overall K (2013) Normal feline behavior and ontogeny: neurological and social development, signaling and normal feline behaviors. Manual of clinical behavioral medicine for dogs and cats, 1st edn. Elsevier Health Sciences, Canada, pp 312–359

    Google Scholar 

  57. Packer C, Lewis S, Pusey A (1992) A comparative analysis of non-offspring nursing. Anim Behav 43:265–281. doi:10.1016/S0003-3472(05)80222-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Poindron P, Lévy F, Keller M (2007) Maternal responsiveness and maternal selectivity in domestic sheep and goats: the two facets of maternal attachment. Dev Psychobiol 49:54–70. doi:10.1002/dev.20192

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Pontier D, Natoli E (1999) Infanticide in rural male cats (Felis catus L.) as a reproductive mating tactic. Aggress Behav 25:445–449. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-2337(1999)25:6<445:AID-AB5>3.0.CO;2-K

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Porter RH, Fullerton C, Berryman JC (1973) Guinea-pig maternal-young attachment behaviour. Z Tierpsychol 32:489–495. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0310.1973.tb01118.x

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Porter RH, Cernoch JM, McLaughlin FJ (1983) Maternal recognition of neonates through olfactory cues. Physiol Behav 30:151–154. doi:10.1016/0031-9384(83)90051-3

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Péter A (2015) Solomon Coder: a simple solution for behavior coding (Version beta 15.11.19). http://solomoncoder.com/

  63. Pusey AE, Packer C (1994) Non-offspring nursing in social carnivores: minimizing the costs. Behav Ecol 5:362–374. doi:10.1093/beheco/5.4.362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Pusey AE, Wolf M (1996) Inbreeding avoidance in animals. Trends Ecol Evol 11:201–206. doi:10.1016/0169-5347(96)10028-8

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. R: A language and environment for statistical computing (2016) 3.3.1 R core team, Vienna, Austria

  66. Rollin BE, Kessel ML (1998) Guidelines for the treatment of animals in behavioural research and teaching. Anim Behav 55:251–257. doi:10.1006/ANBE.1997.0703

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Rosenblatt JS (2010) Behavioral development during the mother-young interaction in placental mammals: the development of behavior in the relationship with the mother. In: Hood KE, Halpern CT, Greenberg G, Lerner RM (eds) Handbook of developmental science, behavior, and genetics, 1st edn. Blackwell Publishing, Chichester, pp 205–233

    Google Scholar 

  68. Sander K, Frome Y, Scheich H (2007) FMRI activations of amygdala, cingulate cortex, and auditory cortex by infant laughing and crying. Hum Brain Mapp 28:1007–1022. doi:10.1002/hbm.20333

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Schmidt PM, Lopez RR, Collier BA (2007) Survival, fecundity, and movements of free-roaming cats. J Wildl Manag 71:915–919. doi:10.2193/2006-066

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Schultze-Westrum TG (1969) Social communication by chemical signals in flying phalangers (Petaurus breviceps papuanus). In: Pfaffmann C (ed) Olfaction and taste: proceedings of the third international symposium, vol 3. Rockefeller University Press. New York, USA, pp 268–277

    Google Scholar 

  71. Seifritz E et al (2003) Differential sex-independent amygdala response to infant crying and laughing in parents versus nonparents. Biol Psychiatry 54:1367–1375. doi:10.1016/S0006-3223(03)00697-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Sherman PW, Reeve HK, Pfennig DW (1997) Recognition systems. In: Krebs JR, Davies NB (eds) Behavioural ecology: an evolutionary approach, 4th edn. Blackwell Science, Oxford, pp 69–96

    Google Scholar 

  73. Spotte S (2014) Free-ranging cats: behavior, ecology, management, 1st edn. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  74. Szenczi P, Bánszegi O, Urrutia A, Faragó T, Hudson R (2016) Mother–offspring recognition in the domestic cat: kittens recognize their own mother’s call. Dev Psychobiol 58:568–577. doi:10.1002/dev.21402

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Todrank J, Heth G (2003) Odor–genes covariance and genetic relatedness assessments: rethinking odor-based “recognition” mechanisms in rodents. Adv Study Behav 32:77–130. doi:10.1016/S0065-3454(03)01002-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Verberne G, de Boer J (1976) Chemocommunication among domestic cats, mediated by the olfactory and vomeronasal senses. Z Tierpsychol 42:86–109. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0310.1976.tb00958.x

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Vuorenkoski V, Wasz-Höckert O, Koivisto E, Lind J (1969) The effect of cry stimulus on the temperature of the lactating breast of primipara. A thermographic study. Experientia 25:1286–1287. doi:10.1007/BF01897502

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. West SA, Pen I, Griffin AS (2002) Cooperation and competition between relatives. Science 296:72–75. doi:10.1126/science.1065507

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Wolski TR (1982) Social behavior of the cat. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 12:693–706. doi:10.1016/S0195-5616(82)50113-1

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Financial support was provided by research grants from the Dirección General de Asuntos del Personal Académico, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (DGAPA-IN205513; IN212416), by a postdoctoral fellowship to O.B. from the Secretaria de Relaciones Exteriories, Mexico, and by two postgraduate fellowships to E. J. and A. U from the Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología, Mexico. We also thank Royal Canin® for generous support in maintaining our cat colony. We thank cat owners (Arturo Coyotecatl, Catherine Fiorella, Daniela Aldama, Gustavo Rosales, Gloria Alcázar, Ilse Franz, María Panfila and Verenice Rodríguez) for allowing us repeated access to their homes and cats, and Carolina Rojas for excellent technical support. The funding agencies did not influence the conduct of the research or manuscript preparation in any way.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Oxána Bánszegi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bánszegi, O., Jacinto, E., Urrutia, A. et al. Can but don’t: olfactory discrimination between own and alien offspring in the domestic cat. Anim Cogn 20, 795–804 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-017-1100-z

Download citation

Keywords

  • Domestic cat
  • Felis silvestris catus
  • Habituation-discrimination technique
  • Mother–offspring discrimination
  • Olfactory communication
  • Retrieval test