Abstract
Change blindness is a phenomenon whereby changes to a stimulus are more likely go unnoticed under certain circumstances. Pigeons learned a change detection task, in which they observed sequential stimulus displays consisting of individual colors back-projected onto three response keys. The color of one response key changed during each sequence and pecks to the key that displayed the change were reinforced. Pigeons showed a change blindness effect, in that change detection accuracy was worse when there was an inter-stimulus interval interrupting the transition between consecutive stimulus displays. Birds successfully transferred to stimulus displays involving novel colors, indicating that pigeons learned a general change detection rule. Furthermore, analysis of responses to specific color combinations showed that pigeons could detect changes involving both spectral and non-spectral colors and that accuracy was better for changes involving greater differences in wavelength. These results build upon previous investigations of change blindness in both humans and pigeons and suggest that change blindness may be a general consequence of selective visual attention relevant to multiple species and stimulus dimensions.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
FWHM, full width at half maximum, is a measure of spectral bandwidth. It is the difference between the two most extreme wavelengths at which intensity drops to half the of the peak wavelength.
References
Blaisdell AP, Cook RG (2005) Two-item same-different concept learning in pigeons. Learn Behav 33:67–77
Blough PM (1972) Wavelength generalization and discrimination in the pigeon. Percept Psychophys 12:342–348
Bridgeman B, Hendry D, Stark L (1975) Failure to detect displacements of the visual world during saccadic eye movements. Vision Res 15:719–722
Brown PL, Jenkins HJ (1968) Autoshaping of the pigeon’s keypeck. J Exp Anal Behav 11:1–8
Cavanaugh J, Wurtz R (2002) Change blindness for motion in macaque monkey. J Vision 2:16
Cook RG, Cavoto KK, Cavoto BR (1996) Mechanisms of multidimensional grouping, fusion, and search in avian texture discrimination. Anim Learn Behav 24:150–167
Cumming WW, Berryman R, Cohen LR (1965) Acquisition and transfer of zero-delay matching. Psychol Rep 17:435–445
Fernández-Juricic E, Erichsen JT, Kacelnik A (2004) Visual perception and social foraging in birds. Trends Ecol Evol 19:25–31
Hagmann CE, Cook RG (2013) Active change detection by pigeons and humans. J Exp Psychol Anim B 39:383–389
Herbranson WT (2015) Change blindness in pigeons (Columba livia): the effects of change salience and timing. Front Psychol 6:1109
Herbranson WT (2017) Selective and divided attention in comparative psychology. In: Call J (ed) APA handbook of comparative psychology, vol 2. American Psychological Association, Washington, pp 183–201
Herbranson WT, Davis ET (2016) The effect of display timing on change blindness in pigeons (Columba livia). J Exp Anal Behav 105:85–99. doi:10.1002/jeab.175
Herbranson WT, Wang S (2014) Testing the limits of optimality: the effect of base rates in the Monty Hall dilemma. Learn Behav 42:69–82
Herbranson WT, Trinh YT, Xi PM, Arand MP, Barker MSK, Pratt TH (2014) Change detection and change blindness in pigeons (Columba livia). J Comp Psychol 128:181–187
Herrnstein RJ, Loveland DH, Cable C (1976) Natural concepts in pigeons. J Exp Psychol Anim B 2:285–302
Hurvich LM, Jameson D (1957) An opponent-process theory of color vision. Psychol Rev 64:384–404
Kane SA, Zamani M (2014) Falcons pursue prey using visual motion cues: new perspectives from animal-borne cameras. J Exp Biol 217:225–234
Kawamura S, Blow NS, Yokoyama S (1999) Genetic analyses of visual pigments of the pigeon (Columba livia). Genetics 153:1839–1850
Lazareva OF, Wasserman EA (2016) No evidence for feature binding by pigeons in a change detection task. Behav Process 123:90–106
Necker R (2007) Head-bobbing of walking birds. J Comp Physiol 193:1177–1183
Poling A, Nickel M, Alling K (1990) Free birds aren’t fat: weight gain in captured wild pigeons maintained under laboratory conditions. J Exp Anal Behav 53:423–424
Reid PJ, Shettleworth SJ (1992) Detection of cryptic prey: search image or search rate? J Exp Psychol Anim B 18:273–286
Remy M, Emmerton J (1989) Behavioral spectral sensitivities of different retinal areas in pigeons. Behav Neurosci 103:170–177
Rensink RA (2000) Visual search for change: a probe into the nature of attentional processing. Vis Cogn 7:345–376
Rensink RA, O’Regan JK, Clark JJ (1997) To see or not to see: the need for attention to perceive changes in scenes. Psychol Sci 8:368–373
Simons DJ, Ambinder MS (2005) Change blindness theory and consequences. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 14:44–48
Simons DJ, Levin DT (1998) Failure to detect changes to people during a real-world interaction. Psychon Bull Rev 5:644–649
Simons DJ, Franconeri SL, Reimer RL (2000) Change blindness in the absence of a visual disruption. Perception 29:1143–1154
Van den Berg R, Shin H, Chou WC, George R, Ma WJ (2012) Variability in encoding precision accounts for visual short-term memory limitations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109:8780–8785
Wortel JF, Wubbels RJ, Nuboer JFW (1984) Photopic spectral sensitivities of the red and the yellow field of the pigeon retina. Vision Res 24:1107–1113
Wright AA, Cumming WW (1971) Color-naming functions for the pigeon. J Exp Anal Behav 15:7–17
Wright AA, Katz JS (2006) Mechanisms of same/different concept learning in primates and avians. Behav Process 72:234–254
Wright AA, Katz JS, Magnotti J, Elmore LC, Babb S, Alwin S (2010) Testing pigeon memory in a change detection task. Psychon Bull Rev 17:243–249
Yazulla S, Granda AM (1973) Opponent-color units in the thalamus of the pigeon (Columba livia). Vision Res 13:1555–1563
Zentall TR (2005) Selective and divided attention in animals. Behav Process 69:1–15
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Brett Lambert, Lyla Wadia, and Tara Mah for helping train birds and collect preliminary data.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
All procedures were in accordance with the Office of Laboratory Animal Welfare and with US Public Health Service Policy on Humane Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. The experiments reported were approved by Whitman College’s Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Herbranson, W.T., Jeffers, J.S. Pigeons (Columba livia) show change blindness in a color-change detection task. Anim Cogn 20, 725–737 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-017-1094-6
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-017-1094-6