Skip to main content
Log in

Adjusting foraging strategies: a comparison of rural and urban common mynas (Acridotheres tristis)

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Animal Cognition Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 16 January 2017

Abstract

Establishment in urbanized environments is associated with changes in physiology, behaviour, and problem-solving. We compared the speed of learning in urban and rural female common mynas, Acridotheres tristis, using a standard visual discrimination task followed by a reversal learning phase. We also examined how quickly each bird progressed through different stages of learning, including sampling and acquisition within both initial and reversal learning, and persistence following reversal. Based on their reliance on very different food resources, we expected urban mynas to learn and reversal learn more quickly but to sample new contingencies for proportionately longer before learning them. When quantified from first presentation to criterion achievement, urban mynas took more 20-trial blocks to learn the initial discrimination, as well as the reversed contingency, than rural mynas. More detailed analyses at the level of stage revealed that this was because urban mynas explored the novel cue-outcome contingencies for longer, and despite transitioning faster through subsequent acquisition, remained overall slower than rural females. Our findings draw attention to fine adjustments in learning strategies in response to urbanization and caution against interpreting the speed to learn a task as a reflection of cognitive ability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderies JM, Katti M, Shochat E (2007) Living in the city: resource availability, predation, and bird population dynamics in urban areas. J Theor Biol 247:36–49. doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2007.01.030

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Audet J-N, Ducatez S, Lefebvre L (2016) The town bird and the country bird: problem solving and immunocompetence vary with urbanization. Behav Ecol 27:637–644

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bókony V, Kulcsár A, Liker A (2010) Does urbanization select for weak competitors in house sparrows? Oikos 119:437–444. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0706.2009.17848.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowmaker JK, Heath LA, Wilkie SE, Hunt DM (1997) Visual pigments and oil droplets from six classes of photoreceptor in the retinas of birds. Vision Res 37:2183–2194

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chittka L, Skorupski P, Raine NE (2009) Speed-accuracy tradeoffs in animal decision making. Trends Ecol Evol 24:400–407. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2009.02.010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Christidis L, Boles W (2008) Systematics and taxonomy of Australian birds. CSIRO Publishing, Melbourne

    Google Scholar 

  • Crisp H, Lill A (2006) City slickers: habitat use and foraging in urban common mynas Acridotheres tristis. Corella 30:9–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Dhami MK, Nagle B (2009) Review of the biology and ecology of the Common Myna (Acridotheres tristis) and some implications for management of this invasive species. Report. Pacific Invasives Initiatives, Auckland

  • Ducatez S, Audet J-N, Lefebvre L (2014) Problem-solving and learning in carib grackles: individuals show a consistent speed–accuracy trade-off. Anim Cogn 18:485–496

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Evans KL (2010) Individual species and urbanisation. In: Urban Ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 53–87

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Feare CJ (2010) The use of Starlicide® in preliminary trials to control invasive common myna Acridotheres tristis populations on St Helena and Ascension islands, Atlantic Ocean. Conserv Evid 7:52–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallistel CR, Gibbon J (2000) Time, rate, and conditioning. Psychol Rev 107:289–344

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gallistel CR, Gibbon J (2001) Models of simple conditioning. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 10:146–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galsworthy MJ, Amrein I, Kuptsov PA et al (2005) A comparison of wild-caught wood mice and bank voles in the Intellicage: assessing exploration, daily activity patterns and place learning paradigms. Behav Brain Res 157:211–217. doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2004.06.021

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Girvan J, Braithwaite V (1998) Population differences in spatial learning in three–spined sticklebacks. Proc R Soc B 265:913–918. doi:10.1098/rspb.1998.0378

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Gossette RL (1969) Variation in magnitude of negative transfer on successive discrimination reversal (SDR) tasks across species. Percept Mot Skills 29:803–811

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gossette RL, Hombach A (1969) Successive discrimination reversal (SDR) performances of American alligators and American crocodiles on a spatial task. Percept Mot Skills 28:63–67. doi:10.2466/pms.1969.28.1.63

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gossette RL, Hood P (1967) Successive discrimination reversal (SDR) performances of Chukars, Ringneck doves and Greater Hill Mynas as a function of correction as opposed to non-correction procedures. Psychon Sci 8:361–362. doi:10.3758/BF03332240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffin AS (2008) Social learning in Indian mynahs, Acridotheres tristis: the role of distress calls. Anim Behav 75:79–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffin AS, Boyce HM (2009) Indian mynahs, Acridotheres tristis, learn about dangerous places by observing the fate of others. Anim Behav 78:79–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffin AS, Diquelou M (2015) Innovative problem solving in birds: a cross-species comparison of two highly successful Passerines. Anim Behav 100:84–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffin AS, Guez D (2014) Innovation and problem solving: a review of common mechanisms. Behav Processes 109:121–134

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Griffin AS, Haythorpe K (2011) Learning from watching alarmed demonstrators: does the cause of alarm matter? Anim Behav 81:1163–1169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffin AS, Guez D, Lermite F, Patience M (2013a) Tracking changing environments: innovators are fast, but not flexible learners. PLoS ONE 8:e84907

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Griffin AS, Lermite F, Perea M, Guez D (2013b) To innovate or not: contrasting effects of social groupings on safe and risky foraging in Indian mynahs. Anim Behav 86:1291–1300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffin AS, Diquelou M, Perea M (2014) Innovative problem solving in birds: a key role of motor diversity. Anim Behav 92:221–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guillette LM, Reddon AR, Hoeschele M, Sturdy CB (2011) Sometimes slower is better: slow-exploring birds are more sensitive to changes in a vocal discrimination task. Proc R Soc B 278:767–773. doi:10.1098/rspb.2010.1669

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jones B, Mishkin M (1972) Limbic lesions and the problem of stimulus—Reinforcement associations. Exp Neurol 36:362–377. doi:10.1016/0014-4886(72)90030-1

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lefebvre L (2013) Brains, innovations, tools and cultural transmission in birds, non-human primates, and fossil hominins. Front Hum Neurosci 7:245

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Lefebvre L, Sol D (2008) Brains, lifestyles and cognition: are there general trends? Brain Behav Evol 72:135–144

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Logan CJ (2016) Behavioral flexibility and problem solving in an invasive bird. PeerJ 4:e1975. doi:10.7717/peerj.1975

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • López-Flores V, MacGregor-Fors I, Schondube JE (2009) Artificial nest predation along a Neotropical urban gradient. Landsc Urban Plan 92:90–95. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2009.03.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin WK (1996) The current and potential distribution of the common myna in Australia. Emu 96:166–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason G, Burn CC, Dallaire JA et al (2013) Plastic animals in cages: behavioural flexibility and responses to captivity. Anim Behav 85:1113–1126. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.02.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGiffin A, Lill A, Beckman J, Johnstone CP (2013) Tolerance of human approaches by Common Mynas along an urban–rural gradient. Emu 113:154–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miranda AC, Schielzeth H, Sonntag T, Partecke J (2013) Urbanization and its effects on personality traits: a result of microevolution or phenotypic plasticity? Glob Chang Biol 19:2634–2644

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Møller AP (2008) Flight distance of urban birds, predation, and selection for urban life. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 63:63–75. doi:10.1007/s00265-008-0636-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oro D, Genovart M, Tavecchia G et al (2013) Ecological and evolutionary implications of food subsidies from humans. Ecol Lett 16:1501–1514. doi:10.1111/ele.12187

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Partecke J, Schwabl I, Gwinner E (2006) Stress and the city: urbanization and its effects on the stress physiology in European blackbirds. Ecology 87:1945–1952

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pearce JM (1997) Animal learning and cognition: an introduction. Psychology Press, Hove

    Google Scholar 

  • Reilly JS (2001) Euthanasia of animals used for scientific purposes. Australian and New Zealand Council for the Care of Animals in Research and Teaching (ANZCCART) Publications, Adelaide

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth TC, LaDage LD, Pravosudov VV (2010) Learning capabilities enhanced in harsh environments: a common garden approach. Proc R Soc B 277:3187–3193. doi:10.1098/rspb.2010.0630

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Roth TC, LaDage LD, Freas CA, Pravosudov VV (2012) Variation in memory and the hippocampus across populations from different climates: a common garden approach. Proc R Soc B 279:402–410. doi:10.1098/rspb.2011.1020

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schusterman RJ (1966) Serial discrimination-reversal learning with and without errors by the California sea lion. J Exp Anal Behav 9:593–600

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Sengupta S (1976) Food and feeding ecology of the common myna Acridotheres tristis. Proc Indian Natl Sci Acad 42:338–345

    Google Scholar 

  • Seress G, Bókony V, Heszberger J, Liker A (2011) Response to predation risk in urban and rural house sparrows. Ethology 117:896–907. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0310.2011.01944.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shochat E (2004) Credit or debit? Resource input changes population dynamics of city-slicker birds. Oikos 106:622–626

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slabbekoorn H, Peet M (2003) Ecology: birds sing at a higher pitch in urban noise. Nature 424:267

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sol D, Duncan RP, Blackburn TM et al (2005) Big brains, enhanced cognition, and response of birds to novel environments. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:5460–5465

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Sol D, Bacher S, Reader SM, Lefebvre L (2008) Brain size predicts the success of mammal species introduced into novel environments. Am Nat 172(Suppl):S63–S71. doi:10.1086/588304

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sol D, Griffin AS, Bartomeus I, Boyce H (2011) Exploring or avoiding novel food resources? The novelty conflict in an invasive bird. PLoS ONE 6:e19535

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Sol D, Bartomeus I, Griffin AS (2012) The paradox of invasion in birds: competitive superiority or ecological opportunism? Oecologia 169:553–564

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sol D, González-Lagos C, Moreira D, Maspons J (2013) Measuring tolerance to urbanization for comparative analyses. Ardeola 60:3–13. doi:10.13157/arla.60.1.2012.3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tebbich S, Sterelny K, Teschke I (2010) The tale of the finch: adaptive radiation and behavioural flexibility. Philos Trans R Soc B 365:1099–1109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tidemann CR (2006) Common Indian myna Website. http://fennerschoolassociated.anu.edu.au/myna/trapping.html. Accessed 18 Oct 2016

  • Uchida K, Suzuki K, Shimamoto T et al (2016) Seasonal variation of flight initiation distance in Eurasian red squirrels in urban versus rural habitat. J Zool 298:225–231. doi:10.1111/jzo.12306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vincze E, Papp S, Preiszner B et al (2016) Habituation to human disturbance is faster in urban than rural house sparrows. Behav Ecol. doi:10.1093/beheco/arw047

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeh PJ, Price TD (2004) Adaptive phenotypic plasticity and the successful colonization of a novel environment. Am Nat 164:531–542

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yeh PJ, Hauber ME, Price TD (2007) Alternative nesting behaviours following colonisation of a novel environment by a passerine bird. Oikos 116:1473–1480

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The research was funded by a FP7-PEOPLE-2013-IRSES research staff exchange grant to TB, SH, OG and ASG. OG was additionally supported by Gu227/16-1 and IF by an FWF grant (Y366-B17) to TB. We thank Nicole Ward and Mattsen Yeark for assisting with data collection and staff at the University of Newcastle Central Animal House for caring for the birds.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrea S. Griffin.

Additional information

The original version of this article was revised: The fourth author’s name was incorrectly published as Thomas Bugynar. The correct name should read as Thomas Bugnyar.

This article is part of the Special Issue Animal cognition in a human-dominated world.

An erratum to this article is available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10071-017-1070-1.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (CSV 2 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Federspiel, I.G., Garland, A., Guez, D. et al. Adjusting foraging strategies: a comparison of rural and urban common mynas (Acridotheres tristis). Anim Cogn 20, 65–74 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-016-1045-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-016-1045-7

Keywords

Navigation