Skip to main content

Intuitive probabilistic inference in capuchin monkeys

Abstract

The ability to reason about probabilities has ecological relevance for many species. Recent research has shown that both preverbal infants and non-human great apes can make predictions about single-item samples randomly drawn from populations by reasoning about proportions. To further explore the evolutionary origins of this ability, we conducted the first investigation of probabilistic inference in a monkey species (capuchins; Sapajus spp.). Across four experiments, capuchins (N = 19) were presented with two populations of food items that differed in their relative distribution of preferred and non-preferred items, such that one population was more likely to yield a preferred item. In each trial, capuchins had to select between hidden single-item samples randomly drawn from each population. In Experiment 1 each population was homogeneous so reasoning about proportions was not required; Experiments 2–3 replicated previous probabilistic reasoning research with infants and apes; and Experiment 4 was a novel condition untested in other species, providing an important extension to previous work. Results revealed that at least some capuchins were able to make probabilistic inferences via reasoning about proportions as opposed to simpler quantity heuristics. Performance was relatively poor in Experiment 4, so the possibility remains that capuchins may use quantity-based heuristics in some situations, though further work is required to confirm this. Interestingly, performance was not at ceiling in Experiment 1, which did not involve reasoning about proportions, but did involve sampling. This suggests that the sampling task posed demands in addition to reasoning about proportions, possibly related to inhibitory control, working memory, and/or knowledge of object permanence.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Notes

  1. 1.

    All analyses reported in this manuscript were also run using nonparametric tests (Friedman's tests, Wilcoxon signed-rank tests; Mann–Whitney U tests) and produced similar P values in all experiments; see Online Resource 3.

  2. 2.

    It should be noted that it is not possible to say how capuchins were estimating proportions, i.e. whether they computed probabilities over numerical representations or continuous quantities, and this question has not yet been examined in either infants or apes. While this is an interesting avenue for future research, computing proportions is about considering relative amounts, regardless of format.

References

  1. Addessi E, Crescimbene L, Visalberghi E (2008) Food and token quantity discrimination in capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella). Anim Cogn 11:275–282

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Albiach-Serrano A, Call J (2014) A reversed-reward contingency task reveals causal knowledge in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Anim Cogn 17(5):1167–1176

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Amici F, Aureli F, Call J (2008) Fission-fusion dynamics, behavioural flexibility, and inhibitory control in primates. Curr Biol 18:1415–1419

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Amici F, Aureli F, Call J (2010) Monkeys and apes: are their cognitive skills really so different? Am J Phys Anthropol 143:188–197

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Anderson JR, Sallaberry P, Barbier H (1995) Use of experimenter-given cues during object-choice tasks by capuchin monkeys. Anim Behav 49:201–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Austin K, Theakston A, Lieven E, Tomasello M (2014) Young children’s understanding of denial. Devel Psychol 50(8):2061–2070

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Beran MJ, Decker S, Schwartz A, Schultz N (2011) Monkeys (Macaca mulatta and Cebus apella) and human adults and children (Homo sapiens) compare subsets of moving stimuli based on numerosity. Front Psychol 2:61

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Bolen RH, Green SM (1997) Use of olfactory cues in foraging by owl monkeys (Aotus nancymai) and capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella). J Comp Psychol 111:152–158

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bräuer J, Kaminski J, Riedel J, Call J, Tomasello M (2006) Making inferences about the location of hidden food: social dog, causal ape. J Comp Psychol 120:38–47

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Brosnan SF, de Waal FBM (2003) Monkeys reject unequal pay. Nature 425:297–299

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Brosnan SF, Schiff HC, de Waal FBM (2005) Tolerance for inequity may increase with social closeness in chimpanzees. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 272:253–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bryant P, Nunes T (2012) Children’s understanding of probability: a literature review (full report). A report to the Nuffield Foundation. Retrieved on 20 May 2015 from: http://www.nuffieldfoundation.org/sites/default/files/files/Nuffield_CuP_FULL_REPORTv_FINAL.pdf

  13. Cronin KA, Snowdon CT (2008) The effects of unequal reward distributions on cooperative problem solving by cotton-top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus). Anim Behav 75:245–257

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. de Waal FBM, Leimgruber K, Greenberg AR (2008) Giving is self-rewarding for monkeys. Proc Nat Acad Sci 105:13685–13689

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Denison S, Xu F (2010) Twelve- to 14-month-old infants can predict single-event probability with large set sizes. Dev Sci 13:798–803

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Denison S, Xu F (2014) The origins of probabilistic inference in human infants. Cognition 130:335–347

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Drucker CB, Rossa MA, Brannon EM (2016) Comparison of discrete ratios by rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta). Anim Cogn 19:57–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Evans TA, Beran MJ, Harris EH, Rice DF (2009) Quantity judgments of sequentially presented food items by capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella). Anim Cogn 12:97–105

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Falk R, Yudilevich-Assouline P, Elstein A (2012) Children’s concept of probability as inferred from their binary choices—revisited. Educ Stud Math 81:207–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Fontanari L, Gonzalez M, Vallortigara G, Girotto V (2014) Probabilistic cognition in two indigenous Mayan groups. Proc Nat Acad Sci 111:17075–17080

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Fragaszy DM, Visalberghi E, Fedigan LM (2004) The complete capuchin: the biology of the genus Cebus. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  22. Girotto V, Fontanari L, Gonzalez M, Vallortigara G, Blaye A (2016) Young children do not succeed in choice tasks that imply evaluating chances. Cognition 152:32–39

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Hanus D, Call J (2014) When maths trumps logic: probabilistic judgements in chimpanzees. Biol Lett 10:20140892

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Hopkins WD, Russell JL, McIntyre J, Leavens DL (2013) Are chimpanzees really so poor at understanding imperative pointing? Some new data and an alternative view of canine and ape social cognition. PLoS ONE 8(11):379338

    Google Scholar 

  25. Jordan KE, Brannon EM (2006) Weber’s Law influences numerical representations in rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta). Anim Cogn 9:159–172

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Judge PG, Evans TA, Vyas DK (2005) Ordinal representation of numeric quantities by brown capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella). J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 31:79–94

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Leonardi R, Buchanan-Smith HM, Dufour V, MacDonald C, Whiten A (2010) Living together: behaviour and welfare in single and mixed species groups of capuchin (Cebus apella) and squirrel monkeys (Saimiri sciureus). Am J Primatol 72:33–47

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. MacLean EL, Hare B, Nunn CL et al (2014) The evolution of self-control. Proc Nat Acad Sci 111:E2140–E2148

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Piaget J, Inhelder B (1975) The Origin of the Idea of Chance in Children. Routledge and Kegan Paul. Translation of original work (1951)

  30. Rakoczy H, Clüver A, Saucke L, Stoffregen N, Gräbener A, Migura J, Call J (2014) Apes are intuitive statisticians. Cognition 131:60–68

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Range F, Horn L, Zs Viranyi, Huber L (2009) Effort and reward: inequity aversion in domestic dogs? Proc Nat Acad Sci 106:340–345

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Reader SM, Hager Y, Laland KN (2011) The evolution of primate general and cultural intelligence. Phil Trans R Soc B 366:1017–1027

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Reznikova Z, Ryabko B (2011) Numerical competence in animals, with an insight from ants. Behaviour 148:405–434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Rugani R, Vallortigara G, Regolin L (2015) The use of proportion by young domestic chicks (Gallus gallus). Anim Cogn 18:605–616

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Rugani R, McCrink K, de Hevia MD, Vallortigara G, Regolin L (2016) Ratio abstraction over discrete magnitudes by newly hatched domestic chicks (Gallus gallus). Sci Rep 6:30114

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Schmitt V, Fischer J (2011) Representational format determines numerical competence in monkeys. Nat Commun 2:257

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Schrauf C, Huber L, Visalberghi E (2008) Do capuchin monkeys use weight to select hammer tools? Anim Cogn 11:413–422

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Tauzin T, Csík A, Kis A, Topál J (2015) What or where? The meaning of referential human pointing for dogs (Canis familiaris). J Comp Psychol 129(4):334

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Teglas E, Girotto V, Gonzalez M, Bonatti LL (2007) Intuitions of probabilities shape expectations about the future at 12 months and beyond. Proc Nat Acad Sci 104:19156–19159

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Teglas E, Vul E, Girotto V, Gonzalez M, Tenenbaum JB, Bonatti LL (2011) Pure reasoning in 12-month-old infants as probabilistic inference. Science 332:1054–1058

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Vallortigara G (2014) Foundations of number and space representations in non-human species. In: Geary DC, Bearch DB, Mann Koepke K (eds) Evolutionary origins and early development of number processing. Elsevier, New York, pp 35–66

    Google Scholar 

  42. VanMarle K, Aw J, Mccrink K, Santos LR (2006) How capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) quantify objects and substances. J Comp Psychol 120:416–426

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Wilson ML, Hauser MD, Wrangham RW (2001) Does participation in intergroup conflict depend on numerical assessment, range location, or rank for wild chimpanzees? Anim Behav 6:1203–1216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Xu F, Garcia V (2008) Intuitive statistics by 8-month-old infants. Proc Nat Acad Sci 105:5012–5015

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the RZSS Living Links staff who gave permission to conduct research and provided invaluable support and assistance. Thanks to Keith Haynes at the University of St Andrews for constructing the cubicle window. Thanks also to Natalia Robert-Nunez for secondary coding of data.

Funding

This study was funded by an Economic and Social Research Council Future Research Leaders Grant (ES/K009540/1) to D.B.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emma C. Tecwyn.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest

Human and animal rights

All procedures were in accordance with UK law and the ASAB Guidelines for the Treatment of Animals in Behavioural Research and Teaching. The study was approved by the University of St Andrews School of Psychology and Neuroscience Ethics Committee and the Research Committee at Living Links.

Additional information

This research was supported by an Economic and Social Research Council Future Research Leaders grant to Daphna Buchsbaum.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 2 (MOV 15213 kb)

Supplementary material 5 (MOV 17637 kb)

Supplementary material 7 (MOV 15744 kb)

Supplementary material 8 (MOV 16326 kb)

Supplementary material 1 (PDF 155 kb)

Supplementary material 3 (PDF 74 kb)

Supplementary material 4 (PDF 117 kb)

Supplementary material 6 (PDF 74 kb)

Supplementary material 9 (PDF 71 kb)

Supplementary material 10 (PDF 95 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tecwyn, E.C., Denison, S., Messer, E.J.E. et al. Intuitive probabilistic inference in capuchin monkeys. Anim Cogn 20, 243–256 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-016-1043-9

Download citation

Keywords

  • Capuchin
  • Intuitive statistics
  • Numerical cognition
  • Primate cognition
  • Probabilistic inference
  • Proportional reasoning