Animal Cognition

, Volume 19, Issue 2, pp 317–327 | Cite as

Does affective information influence domestic dogs’ (Canis lupus familiaris) point-following behavior?

  • Ross FlomEmail author
  • Peggy Gartman
Original Paper


Several studies have examined dogs’ (Canis lupus familiaris) comprehension and use of human communicative cues. Relatively few studies have, however, examined the effects of human affective behavior (i.e., facial and vocal expressions) on dogs’ exploratory and point-following behavior. In two experiments, we examined dogs’ frequency of following an adult’s pointing gesture in locating a hidden reward or treat when it occurred silently, or when it was paired with a positive or negative facial and vocal affective expression. Like prior studies, the current results demonstrate that dogs reliably follow human pointing cues. Unlike prior studies, the current results also demonstrate that the addition of a positive affective facial and vocal expression, when paired with a pointing gesture, did not reliably increase dogs’ frequency of locating a hidden piece of food compared to pointing alone. In addition, and within the negative facial and vocal affect conditions of Experiment 1 and 2, dogs were delayed in their exploration, or approach, toward a baited or sham-baited bowl. However, in Experiment 2, dogs continued to follow an adult’s pointing gesture, even when paired with a negative expression, as long as the attention-directing gesture referenced a baited bowl. Together these results suggest that the addition of affective information does not significantly increase or decrease dogs’ point-following behavior. Rather these results demonstrate that the presence or absence of affective expressions influences a dogs’ exploratory behavior and the presence or absence of reward affects whether they will follow an unfamiliar adult’s attention-directing gesture.


Emotional expressions Point following Object choice Domestic dogs Social referencing 



All procedures performed in these experiments were in accordance with the ethical standards of the BYU Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. These data were submitted in partial support of the second author’s MS thesis from Brigham Young University. This research was supported by a Brigham Young University undergraduate mentoring grant awarded to the first author. The authors gratefully acknowledge Sean and Ana Aaron, Andrew Dorsett, Chantelle Fitting, Darren Guenther, James Parker, and Will West, for their assistance in data collection. A portion of this data was presented at the 50th annual meeting of the Animal Behavior Society, July 2013.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.


  1. Aust U, Range F, Steurer M, Huber L (2008) Inferential reasoning by exclusion in pigeons, dogs, and humans. Anim Cogn 11:587–597CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bentosela M, Barrera G, Jakovcevic A, Elgier A, Mustaca A (2008) Effect of reinforcement, reinforcer omission and extinction on a communicative response in domestic dogs (Canis familiaris). Behav Process 78:464–469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Buttelmann D, Tomasello M (2013) Can domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) use referential emotional expressions to locate hidden food? Anim Cogn 16:137–145CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Ekman P, Friesen WV (1975) Unmasking the face. A guide to recognizing emotions from facial clues. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  5. Flom R, Bahrick L (2007) The effects of multimodal stimulation on infants’ discrimination of affect: an examination of the intersensory redundancy hypothesis. Dev Psychol 43:238–252PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Fridlund A (1994) Human facial expression: an evolutionary view. Academic Press, San Diego, CAGoogle Scholar
  7. Gibson EJ, Pick AD (2003) Ecological approach to perceptual learning and development. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. Hare B, Tomasello M (1999) Domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) use human and conspecific social cues to locate hidden food. J Comp Psychol 113:173–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hare B, Brown M, Williamson C, Tomasello M (2002) The domestication of social cognition in dogs. Science 298:1634–1636CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Kaminski J, Call J, Fischer J (2004) Word learning in a domestic dog: evidence for “fast mapping. Science 304:1682–1683CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Kaminski J, Schulz L, Tomasello M (2012) How dogs know when communication is intended for them. Dev Sci 15:222–232CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Lakatos G, Soproni K, Dóka A, Miklósi Á (2009) A comparative approach to dogs’ (Canis familiaris) and human infants’ comprehension of various forms of pointing gestures. Anim Cogn 12:621–631CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Lakatos G, Gácsi M, Topál J, Miklósi Á (2012) Comprehension and utilisation of pointing gestures and gazing in dog–human communication in relatively complex situations. Anim Cogn 15:201–213CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Merola I, Prato-Previde E, Marshall-Pescini S (2012a) Social referencing in dog-owner dyads? Anim Cogn 15:175–185CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Merola I, Prato-Previde E, Marshall-Pescini S (2012b) Dogs social referencing towards owners and strangers. PLoS One 7(10):e47653PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Merola I, Marshall-Pescini S, D’Aniello B, Prato-Previde E (2013) Social referencing: water rescue trained dogs are less affected by the strangers message. App Anim Behav Sci 147:132–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Merola I, Prato-Previde E, Lazzaroni M, Marshall-Pescini S (2014) Dogs’ comprehension of referential emotional expressions: familiar people and familiar emotions are easier. Anim Cogn 17:373–385CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Miklósi Á, Soproni K (2006) A comparative analysis of animals’ understanding of the human pointing gesture. Anim Cogn 9:81–93CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Miklósi Á, Polgárdi R, Topál J, Csányi V (1998) Use of experimenter-given cues in dogs. Anim Cogn 1:113–121CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Morisaki A, Takaoka A, Fujita K (2009) Are dogs sensitive to the emotional state of humans? J Vet Behav Clin Appl Res 4:49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Nagasawa M, Murai K, Mogi K, Kikusui T (2011) Dogs can discriminate smiling faces from blank expression. Anim Cogn 14:525–533CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Riedel J, Schumann K, Kaminski J, Call J, Tomasello M (2008) The early ontogeny of human-dog communication. Anim Behav 75:1003–1014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Soproni K, Miklósi A, Topál J, Csányi V (2001) Comprehension of human communicative signs in pet dogs (Canis familiaris). J Comp Psychol 115:122–126. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.115.2.122 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Soproni K, Miklósi Á, Topál J, Csányi V (2002) Dogs’ (Canis familaris) responsiveness to human pointing gestures. J Comp Psychol 116:27–34CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Sorce J, Emde R, Campos J, Klinnert M (1985) Maternal emotional signaling: its effect on the visual cliff behavior of 1-year-olds. Dev Psychol 21:195–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Udell MAR, Giglio RF, Wynne CDL (2008) Domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) use human gestures but not nonhuman tokens to find hidden food. J Comp Psychol 122:84–93CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Walden TA, Ogan TA (1988) The development of social referencing. Child Dev 59:1230–1240CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Wells DL (2003) Lateralised behaviour in the domestic dog, Canis familiaris. Behav Process 61:27–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyBrigham Young UniversityProvoUSA

Personalised recommendations