Several antipredator strategies are related to prey colouration. Some colour patterns can create visual illusions during movement (such as motion dazzle), making it difficult for a predator to capture moving prey successfully. Experimental evidence about motion dazzle, however, is still very scarce and comes only from studies using human predators capturing moving prey items in computer games. We tested a motion dazzle effect using for the first time natural predators (wild great tits, Parus major). We used artificial prey items bearing three different colour patterns: uniform brown (control), black with elongated yellow pattern and black with interrupted yellow pattern. The last two resembled colour patterns of the aposematic, polymorphic dart-poison frog Dendrobates tinctorius. We specifically tested whether an elongated colour pattern could create visual illusions when combined with straight movement. Our results, however, do not support this hypothesis. We found no differences in the number of successful attacks towards prey items with different patterns (elongated/interrupted) moving linearly. Nevertheless, both prey types were significantly more difficult to catch compared to the uniform brown prey, indicating that both colour patterns could provide some benefit for a moving individual. Surprisingly, no effect of background (complex vs. plain) was found. This is the first experiment with moving prey showing that some colour patterns can affect avian predators’ ability to capture moving prey, but the mechanisms lowering the capture rate are still poorly understood.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Allen WL, Baddeley R, Scott-Samuel NE, Cuthill IC (2013) The evolution and function of pattern diversity in snakes. Behav Ecol 24:1237–1250. doi:10.1093/beheco/art058
Blakemore MR, Snowden RJ (2000) Textured backgrounds alter perceived speed. Vision Res 40:629–638. doi:10.1016/S0042-6989(99)00214-X
Brodie ED (1989) Genetic correlations between morphology and antipredator behaviour in natural populations of the garter snake Thamnophis ordinoides. Nature 342:542–543. doi:10.1038/342542a0
Brodie ED (1992) Correlational selection for color pattern and antipredator behavior in the garter snake Thamnophis ordinoides. Evolution 46:1284–1298. doi:10.2307/2409937
Cott HB (1940) Adaptive coloration in animals. Methuen, London
Cuthill IC, Partridge JC, Bennet AT, Church SC, Hart NS, Hun S (2000) Ultraviolet vision in birds. Adv Stud Behav 29:159–214
Dittrich WH, Lea SEG (2001) Motion discrimination and recognition. In: Cook RG (ed) Avian visual cognition. http://www.pigeon.psy.tufts.edu/avc/dittrich/
Dittrich WH, Gilbert F, Green P, McGregor P, Grewcock D (1993) Imperfect mimicry: a pigeon’s perspective. Proc R Soc B 251:195–200
Green PR, Gentle L, Peake TM, Scudamore RE, McGregor PK, Gilbert F, Dittrich WH (1999) Conditioning pigeons to discriminate naturally lit insect specimens. Behav Proc 46:97–102
Hatle JD, Faragher SG (1998) Slow movement increases the survivorship of a chemically defended grasshopper in predatory encounters. Oecologia 115:260–267. doi:10.1007/s004420050515
Hatle JD, Salazar BA, Whitman DW (2002) Survival advantage of sluggish individuals in aggregations of aposematic prey, during encounters with ambush predators. Evol Ecol 16:415–431. doi:10.1023/A:1020814110102
Hughes AE et al (2014) Motion dazzle and the effects of target patterning on capture success. BMC Evol Biol 14:201. doi:10.1186/s12862-014-0201-4
Jackson JF, Ingram W, Campbell HW (1976) The dorsal pigmentation pattern of snakes as an antipredatory strategy: a multivariate approach. Am Nat 110:1029–1053
Jarvis JR, Taylor NR, Prescott NB, Meeks I, Wathes CM (2002) Measuring and modelling the photopic flicker sensitivity of the chicken (Gallus g. domesticus). Vision Res 42:99–106. doi:10.1016/S0042-6989(01)00268-1
Kelley LA, Kelley JL (2014) Animal visual illusion and confusion: the importance of a perceptual perspective. Behav Ecol 25:450–463. doi:10.1093/beheco/art118
Lindström L, Alatalo RV, Mappes J (1999) Reactions of hand-reared and wild-caught predators toward warningly colored, gregarious, and conspicuous prey. Behav Ecol 10:317–322. doi:10.1093/beheco/10.3.317
Lyytinen A, Brakefield PM, Lindström L, Mappes J (2004) Does predation maintain eyespot plasticity in Bicyclus anynana? Proc R Soc B 271:279–283. doi:10.1098/rspb.2003.2571
Nakamura N, Fujita K, Ushitani T, Miyata H (2006) Perception of the standard and the reversed Muller-Lyer figures in pigeons (Columba livia) and humans (Homo sapiens). J Comp Psychol 120:252–261
Niskanen M, Mappes J (2005) Significance of the dorsal zigzag pattern of Vipera latastei gaditana against avian predators. J Anim Ecol 74:1091–1101. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2656.2005.01008.x
Nokelainen O, Valkonen J, Lindstedt C, Mappes J (2014) Changes in predator community structure shifts the efficacy of two warning signals in Arctiid moths. J Anim Ecol 83:598–605. doi:10.1111/1365-2656.12169
Noonan BP, Comeault AA (2009) The role of predator selection on polymorphic aposematic poison frogs. Biol Lett 5:51–54. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2008.0586
Pepperberg IM, Vicinay J, Cavanagh P (2008) Processing of the Muller-Lyer illusion by a Grey parrot (Psittacus erithacus). Perception 37:765–781
Pough FH (1976) Multiple cryptic effects of crossbanded and ringed patterns of snakes. Copeia 4:834–836
Poulton EB (1890) The colours of animals: their meaning and use. Especially considered in the case of insects. Kegan Paul, Trench, Tubner and Co., London
Rojas B, Endler JA (2013) Sexual dimorphism and intra-populational colour pattern variation in the aposematic frog Dendrobates tinctorius. Evol Ecol 27:739–753. doi:10.1007/s10682-013-9640-4
Rojas B, Devillechabrolle J, Endler JA (2014) Paradox lost: variable colour-pattern geometry is associated with differences in movement in aposematic frogs. Biol Lett 10:20140193. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2014.0193
Ruxton GD, Sherratt TN, Speed MP (2004) Avoiding attack. Evolutionary ecology of crypsis, warning signals and mimicry. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Schuler W, Hesse E (1985) On the function of warning coloration: a black and yellow pattern inhibits prey-attack by naive domestic chicks. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 16:249–255. doi:10.1007/BF00310988
Scott-Samuel NE, Baddeley R, Palmer CE, Cuthill IC (2011) Dazzle camouflage affects speed perception. PLoS ONE. 6. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0020233
Sih A (1984) The behavioral response race between predator and prey. Am Nat 123:143–150
Stevens M (2007) Predator perception and the interrelation between different forms of protective coloration. Proc R Soc B 274:1457–1464. doi:10.1098/rspb.2007.0220
Stevens M, Merilaita S (2009) Defining disruptive coloration and distinguishing its functions. Phil Trans R Soc B 364:481–488. doi:10.1098/rstb.2008.0216
Stevens M, Yule DH, Ruxton GD (2008) Dazzle coloration and prey movement. Proc R Soc B 275:2639–2643. doi:10.1098/rspb.2008.0877
Stevens M, Searle WTL, Seymour JE, Marshall KL, Ruxton GD (2011) Motion dazzle and camouflage as distinct anti-predator defenses. BMC Biol 9:81. doi:10.1186/1741-7007-9-81
Thayer GH (1909) Concealing-coloration in the animal kingdom: an exposition of the laws of disguise through color and pattern: being a summary of Abbott H. Thayer’s discoveries. Macmillan, New York
von Helversen B, Schooler LJ, Czienskowski U (2013) Are stripes beneficial? Dazzle camouflage influences perceived speed and hit rates. PLoS ONE 8. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0061173
Watanabe S, Nakamura N, Fujita K (2011) Pigeons perceive a reversed Zollner illusion. Cognition 119:137–141
Watanabe S, Nakamura N, Fujita K (2013) Bantams (Gallus gallus domesticus) also perceive a reversed Zollner illusion. Anim Cogn 16:109–115
Wollenberg KC, Lötters S, Mora-Ferrer C, Veith M (2008) Disentangling composite colour patterns in a poison frog species. Biol J Linn Soc 93:433–444. doi:10.1111/j.1095-8312.2007.00906.x
We are most grateful to Helinä Nisu for taking care of the birds, to Morgan Brain for help during the preference tests, and to Laura Kelley for helpful comments on the manuscript. Permits for experiments with wild birds were issued by the Central Finland Centre for Economic Development, Transport and Environment (KESELY/1017/07.01/2010) and the National Animal Experiment Board (ESAVI-2010-087517Ym-23). The study was funded by Societas Biologica Fennica Vanamo (grant to LH), and the Finnish Centre of Excellence in Biological Interactions (project SA-252411).
Conflict of interest
About this article
Cite this article
Hämäläinen, L., Valkonen, J., Mappes, J. et al. Visual illusions in predator–prey interactions: birds find moving patterned prey harder to catch. Anim Cogn 18, 1059–1068 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-015-0874-0
- Colour polymorphism
- Motion dazzle
- Predator–prey interactions
- Visual illusions